创新联盟竞合视角下知识产权风险对绩效的影响研究

发布时间：2018-03-08 14:51

本文选题：创新联盟　切入点：知识产权风险　出处：《河北经贸大学》2014年硕士论文　论文类型：学位论文

【摘要】：整合创新资源、分散创新风险、提高创新绩效是企业间愿意主动合作、形成创新联盟的本意。但在创新联盟成员知识共享、技术创新过程中，资源投入机制不健全、风险管理机制不完善、利益分配机制不完备等问题频频出现，障碍了联盟作用的有效发挥。而其中由知识产权引发的风险问题，由于既涉及到联盟企业的核心资源，又关系到联盟合作的收益大小和利益分配，更成为多数联盟既难以解决、又回避不掉的难点所在。因此，研究联盟知识共享过程中知识产权风险对联盟创新绩效的影响机制，具有积极的实践意义。研究中发现多数参与联盟的企业既竞争又合作。盟员之所以合作，是因为每个企业都缺少创新所需的全部资源，或者为了快速研发产品在市场中获得竞争优势。然而，往往合作的企业在市场中又是竞争对手，他们想通过合作免费获取其他企业的核心资源，进而自主研发，打击竞争对手。本研究从联盟成员竞合动机的角度出发，研究竞合动机对知识产权风险与创新绩效之间的关系有何影响。本研究关注创新联盟技术共享过程中知识产权风险对联盟绩效的抑制作用以及盟员竞合动机对知识产权风险与联盟绩效关系的积极调节作用，并通过对盟员获得绩效的中介效应分析，剖析了知识产权风险对创新绩效影响的内在机制。本文基于资源基础论和知识共享理论，建立了知识产权风险对联盟绩效影响的理论模型，并以300家参与合作创新的企业为样本，运用Lisrel结构方程模型对其进行了实证检验。本研究的主要工作及其结论可归纳为以下几个方面：（1）突破从法学角度对知识产权风险的研究，本文从管理学角度研究了知识产权风险。创新联盟成员在知识、技术共享与创新的过程中，容易面临知识产权被合作伙伴窃取、知识产权的无意流失、知识产权投入不完全、知识产权有投入无回报、新知识产权归属不明晰等知识产权风险。因此，盟员在知识共享过程中，联盟面临的知识产权风险应运而生。（2）本研究突破了对知识产权风险先期研究中局限于其与创新绩效之间的简单负相关关系分析，研究发现盟员获得绩效在知识产权风险与联盟创新绩效的关系间发挥着中介效应，，深化了对知识产权风险影响创新绩效的内在机理研究。结论认为，联盟中知识产权风险的存在通过降低盟员的获得绩效，从而削弱了联盟整体的创新绩效。（3）研究发现盟员合作过程中既分享又保护自身的核心知识，既合作创新又通过竞争获取竞争优势，即合作伙伴之间存在竞合博弈，本研究在此基础上深入探讨了联盟这一复杂组织中竞争与合作的博弈对知识产权风险的影响，研究发现了盟员竞合动机对知识产权风险和联盟绩效之间关系的调节作用。实证表明，联盟成员竞合动机越强，知识产权风险对联盟创新绩效的影响越小。本研究上述得出的重要结论对我国创新联盟在运行过程中面临知识产权风险问题具有重要指导意义，对参与联盟的企业在合作创新过程中有重要的管理启示，但在研究过程中仍存在一些不足之处，如未曾对创新联盟进行进一步细分、对获取的数据并非纵向追踪的面板数据等，在之后研究中将进行完善。
[Abstract]:The integration of innovative resources, decentralized innovation risk, improve innovation performance is willing to take the initiative and cooperation between enterprises, the formation of innovation alliance intention. But sharing in members of knowledge innovation alliance, in the process of technological innovation, resource investment mechanism is not perfect, risk management mechanism is not perfect, the interest distribution mechanism is not complete and other problems appeared frequently, obstacles effectively the role of alliance. The problems caused by the risk of intellectual property, because it not only involves to the core resources of enterprise alliance, and related to the size of the alliance income and distribution of interests, become the majority alliance both difficult to resolve, and avoid the difficulty lies off. Therefore, the influence mechanism of intellectual property risk in knowledge sharing process the alliance innovation performance, has a positive practical significance.
The study found that the majority of enterprises involved in the alliance of both competition and cooperation. The cooperation partner, because each enterprise lack all the resources needed for innovation, rapid product development or in order to gain a competitive advantage in the market. However, often the cooperation of enterprises in the market and competitors, the core resources they want to get free of other enterprises through cooperation, and independent research and development, against competitors. This study from the perspective of alliance members competing motivation, motivation of concurrence of the impact on the relationship between intellectual property risk and innovation performance.
This research focuses on the technology innovation alliance sharing of intellectual property risk in the process of inhibitory effect on alliance performance and federate concurrence motivation moderating effect on the relationship between intellectual property risk and alliance performance, and through the analysis of the mediating effect of performance of enterprise, analyze the internal mechanism of intellectual property risk influence on innovation performance. The resource based theory and based on the knowledge sharing theory, a theoretical model of intellectual property risk influence on alliance performance, and to 300 in cooperative innovation of enterprises as samples, using Lisrel structural equation model for empirical research on it.
The main work of this study and its conclusions can be summed up in the following aspects:
(1) breakthrough research on intellectual property risk from the perspective of law, this article from the perspective of management of intellectual property risk. In the process of knowledge innovation alliance, technology sharing and innovation, intellectual property rights are vulnerable to steal intellectual property partner, unintentional loss, intellectual property investment is not complete, intellectual property investment no return, the new intellectual property ownership is not clear, the risk of intellectual property rights. Therefore, members in the knowledge sharing process, intellectual property risks facing the Alliance came into being.
(2) the study breaks through the analysis of the simple negative correlation between intellectual property risk pilot study is limited to between it and the innovation performance, the study found that members gain performance plays a mediating effect on the relationship between intellectual property risk and alliance innovation performance, the deepening of the intellectual property risk influence innovation performance research on the intrinsic mechanism. Conclusion that intellectual property risk exists in the alliance members obtained by reducing the performance, thus weakening the innovation performance of the alliance as a whole.
(3) the study found that in the process of cooperation and sharing partners to protect the core knowledge itself, both cooperation and innovation through competition and gain competitive advantage, namely the competitive game between the partners, on the basis of in-depth study of the influence of the game competition and cooperation in this complex organization in the alliance of intellectual property risk, research found moderating effects on the relationship between members competing motivation of intellectual property risk and alliance performance. The empirical results show that the alliance members competing stronger motivation influence of intellectual property risk to the alliance innovation performance is small.
The conclusion above has important guiding significance to our country's innovation alliance risk of intellectual property rights in the operation process of enterprises involved in the alliance management has important enlightenment in the process of cooperation innovation, but there are still some deficiencies in the research process, such as no further subdivision of the innovation alliance, to obtain the data are not longitudinal panel data, research, after the improvement.

【学位授予单位】：河北经贸大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2014
【分类号】：F273.1;F204

【引证文献】