我国外观设计审查制度的完善

发布时间：2018-03-15 08:36

本文选题：外观设计　切入点：审查主体　出处：《华东政法大学》2013年硕士论文　论文类型：学位论文

【摘要】：近30年来，随着我国对知识产权的重视不断加强，我国知识产权的发展取得了巨大的进步。外观设计专利作为我国专利法的重要组成部分之一，已经连续多年在申请量和授权量上位居全球第一，与此不相适应的是，外观设计专利的创新高度和授权后的稳定性等一系列问题却逐渐凸显出来，而解决这一系列问题的根源，就在于我国外观设计专利的审查制度。本论文意图从我国外观设计审查和授权审查的角度出发，对于在外观设计审查和授权过程中出现的问题进行探讨，提出适合的立法建议，以完善我国的外观设计审查制度。本文第一部分对外观设计的定义和外观设计制度设立的目的进行了阐述。第一节主要介绍了外观设计专利制度的设立和发展。第二节对我国外观设计专利目前的授权情况进行说明，指出我国外观设计专利存在的问题现状和出现此种情况的原因。本文第二部分主要介绍了我国外观设计授权条件。此部分主要从新颖性和创造性的条件出发，对比分析我国与其他国家在新颖性和创造性上规定的区别。并谈到在现有我国实施绝对新颖性条件下的互联网信息认为为现有技术规定的缺失和其他国家的相关规定，并提出在我国的相关建议。对于已经引入的创造性条件，阐述了实质审查的必要性。本文第三部分主要指出了我国现有外观设计审查制度存在的缺陷。由于部分外观设计专利的出现，开始质疑我国一直以混淆标准来进行授权审查，从而谈到创新标准以及创新标准下审查主体的选择。另外，谈到我国外观设计专利中对于美感问题的判断标准进行了探讨。本文第四部分对我国的外观设计专利制度的完善提出了相应的建议。根据现有制度存在的缺陷，提出了应该引入部分外观设计专利制度进行完善，从而需要在授权审查中以创新标准来判断外观设计专利申请，并明确在创新标准下应以一般设计者的角度进行判断。最后，对于我国外观设计专利美感标准设立的目的进行了说明。
[Abstract]:In the past 30 years, with the increasing attention to intellectual property in China, the development of intellectual property in China has made great progress. Design patent is one of the important parts of patent law in China. The number of applications and authorizations has been ranked first in the world for many years in a row. What does not correspond to this is that a series of problems, such as the height of innovation of design patents and the stability after licensing, have gradually become prominent, and the root causes of these problems have been solved. It lies in the examination system of design patent in our country. This paper intends to discuss the problems in the process of design review and authorization from the point of view of design review and authorization review in our country, and put forward appropriate legislative suggestions to perfect the system of design review in China. The first part of this paper describes the definition of design and the purpose of setting up the design system. The first section mainly introduces the establishment and development of the patent system of design. To explain the status of its mandate, This paper points out the existing problems and reasons of the patent of design in China. The second part of this paper mainly introduces the authorization conditions of design in China. This part mainly starts from the conditions of novelty and creativity. Comparing and analyzing the differences between China and other countries in terms of novelty and creativeness, and talking about the lack of existing technical regulations and the relevant provisions of other countries in implementing Internet information under the condition of absolute novelty in our country. Some suggestions are put forward in our country. The necessity of substantive examination is expounded for the creative conditions that have been introduced. The third part of this paper mainly points out the defects of the existing design review system in our country. Due to the appearance of some design patents, the author begins to question that our country has been carrying out authorization review with confusion standard. In addition, this paper discusses the criteria for judging aesthetic feeling in our country's design patent. In the 4th part of this paper, the author puts forward the corresponding suggestions on the perfection of the patent system of design in China. According to the defects of the existing system, the author puts forward that some patent system of design should be introduced to perfect the system. Therefore, it is necessary to judge the patent application for appearance design by the innovation standard in the authorization examination, and to make it clear that the patent application should be judged from the perspective of the general designer under the innovation standard. Finally, The purpose of setting up the standard of aesthetic sense of design patent in China is explained.
【学位授予单位】：华东政法大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2013
【分类号】：D923.42

【相似文献】