论反垄断法对专利权滥用的规制

发布时间：2018-03-19 07:04

本文选题：反垄断法　切入点：专利权滥用　出处：《中南大学》2011年硕士论文　论文类型：学位论文

【摘要】：专利权滥用是指专利权所有人或独占实施的被许可人在实施权利的过程中,超出了法律允许的范围或正当的界限,损害他人正当利益或社会公共利益的行为。它主要有四个构成要件：主体为专利权所有人或独占实施的被许可人；客体是国家的、集体的或者他人的合法的权益；主观上权利人有过错,包括故意和过失；客观上造成了直接或间接地损害后果或损害威胁。现在市场活动中,专利权滥用行为主要触犯反垄断法的规定,表现为搭售、拒绝许可、不合理定价、专利联营等形式。国外特别是美国、欧盟和日本,其反垄断法规制专利权滥用的发展较为完善,其优秀的经验表现为：反垄断法是规制专利权滥用主要的法律,对其的规制也首先与其他垄断行为一样对待；专门的反垄断执法机关不仅适时地制定相关指南,将反垄断法的一般适用有针对性地适用到知识产权领域,而且还会设置知识产权领域反垄断法的专职机构,共同保障对专利权滥用行为规制的实施。在我国《反垄断法》中,处理知识产权领域反垄断问题时最直接的规定就是第五十五条。该规定确定了对专利权滥用构成垄断行为适用的同等原则及合理原则,也明确了滥用专利权造成排除或限制竞争时要承担的行政责任、民事责任等。但这一原则性规定可操作性不强,加上专利权滥用行为的专业性和复杂性,我国单一的、行政占主导的反垄断法实施机制不能应对全部的专利权滥用反垄断案件。所以需要在现有法律制度上,进一步细化滥用专利权构成垄断行为的认定标准、加强反垄断执法审查机构的建设,反垄断法也需要与专利法对其协调规制。在处理纠纷时,引入私人诉讼、和解等多元化的纠纷解决机制,从程序上和实体上完善反垄断法规制专利权滥用的体系。
[Abstract]:The abuse of patent right means that the patent owner or exclusive licensee exceeds the scope or the proper limit permitted by law in the course of the exercise of the right. The act of harming the legitimate interests of others or the public interests of the society. It has four main constitutive requirements: the subject is the owner of the patent right or the licensee who is monopolized, the object is the state, the collective or the legitimate rights and interests of others; Subjectively, the obligee is at fault, including intentional and negligent; objectively, it has caused direct or indirect damage consequences or damage threats. At present, in market activities, the abuse of patent rights mainly violates the provisions of the anti-monopoly law and manifests itself as a tying sale. In foreign countries, especially in the United States, the European Union and Japan, the development of anti-monopoly laws to regulate the abuse of patent rights is relatively perfect. Its outstanding experience shows that: Anti-monopoly law is the main law to regulate patent abuse, and its regulation is first the same as other monopoly behavior; the specialized anti-monopoly law enforcement agencies not only formulate relevant guidelines in good time, The general application of anti-monopoly law will be applied to the field of intellectual property, and a full-time organization of anti-monopoly law in the field of intellectual property will be set up to jointly guarantee the enforcement of the regulation of patent abuse. The most direct provision in dealing with antitrust issues in the field of intellectual property is 55th. This provision establishes the same principles and reasonable principles applicable to the abuse of patent rights that constitute monopolies. It also clarifies the administrative liability and civil liability to be borne when the abuse of patent rights results in the exclusion or restriction of competition. However, this principled provision is not operable, and because of the professionalism and complexity of patent abuse, our country is single. The enforcement mechanism of the administrative dominant anti-monopoly law cannot cope with all cases of patent abuse and anti-monopoly. Therefore, it is necessary to further refine the criteria for the identification of patent abuse constituting monopoly in the existing legal system. To strengthen the construction of the anti-monopoly law enforcement review agency, the anti-monopoly law also needs to coordinate with the patent law to regulate it. When dealing with disputes, a diversified dispute resolution mechanism, such as private litigation and reconciliation, is introduced. Improve the system of anti-monopoly law to regulate patent abuse in procedure and entity.
【学位授予单位】：中南大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2011
【分类号】：D922.294

【参考文献】