论著作权善意取得制度的构建

发布时间：2018-03-22 08:13

本文选题：著作权转让　切入点：著作权善意取得　出处：《辽宁大学》2013年硕士论文　论文类型：学位论文

【摘要】：著作权作为一种典型的知识产权，其权利客体是智力成果，具有非物质性的特点。作品权利人对其只能虚拟占有，正是因为著作权不能像动产所有权那样以占有的方式进行公示，权利归属和权利状态缺乏为外界所知的表征，容易在转让中出现著作权重复转让或重复授权问题，即著作权“一权多卖”或善意取得问题。因实践中著作权存在无权处分的可能性，为了维护著作权交易安全，实现民法上的诚实信用和信赖保护，著作权适用善意取得制度是很有必要的。由于对著作权基于准占有的公信力所产生的信赖利益应予以保护，并且国外不少国家承认著作权的善意取得制度，在我国的法律框架下也可以借鉴物权的善意取得制度，我国司法实践中不乏适用著作权善意取得制度解决实际纠纷的案例，因此著作权善意取得制度在我国是具有可行性的。为了构建著作权善意取得制度，在著作权转让的模式选择上，理论界的争论集中在登记对抗主义模式和登记生效主义两种模式上。著作权权利变动宜采取登记对抗主义模式，即著作权的权利转让，交易双方应当签订书面合同，应将著作权转让合同送至著作权管理机关进行登记。转让合同未经登记的，不得对抗善意第三人。登记对抗主义体现了适度管理精神，平衡了维护交易安全与尊重著作权人隐私，符合著作权法的保护精神。同时可以节约成本，，促进著作权交易繁荣。构成著作权善意取得，必须符合出让人无处分权、著作权交易行为具有有偿性、受让人出于善意、完成登记这四个要件。善意第三人取得著作权一旦构成了善意取得，善意第三人取得该著作权的相应权利，该权利上原本存在的权利趋于消灭；原权利人有权向无权处分人请求赔偿因其无权处分而造成的损失。
[Abstract]:As a kind of typical intellectual property, the object of copyright is intellectual achievement, which has the characteristics of immateriality. It is precisely because copyright can not be publicized in the way of possession like the ownership of movable property, the ownership of rights and the state of rights are not well known to the outside world, so it is easy to have the problem of duplicate transfer or repeated authorization of copyright in the transfer. Because of the possibility of unauthorized disposition of copyright in practice, in order to safeguard the safety of copyright transaction and realize the protection of good faith and trust in civil law, It is necessary for copyright to apply the system of bona fide acquisition. Since the trust interests arising from the credibility of copyright based on quasi-possession should be protected, and many foreign countries recognize the system of bona fide acquisition of copyright, Under the legal framework of our country, we can also draw lessons from the bona fide acquisition system of real right. In our judicial practice, there are many cases in which the bona fide acquisition system of copyright is applied to solve the actual disputes. Therefore, the system of bona fide acquisition of copyright is feasible in China. In order to construct the system of bona fide acquisition of copyright, the mode of copyright transfer is chosen. The controversy in the theoretical circle focuses on the two modes of registration antagonism and registration effectivism. The mode of registration antagonism should be adopted in the change of copyright rights, that is, the transfer of copyright rights, and the parties to the transaction should sign a written contract. The copyright transfer contract shall be sent to the copyright administration authority for registration. If the transfer contract is not registered, it shall not be against a bona fide third party. Registration antagonism embodies the spirit of moderate management. It balances the maintenance of transaction security and respect for the privacy of copyright owners, and conforms to the spirit of protection of copyright law. At the same time, it can save costs and promote the prosperity of copyright transactions. The act of copyright transaction is paid, and the transferee completes the registration of the four elements out of good faith. Once the bona fide third party acquires the copyright in good faith, the bona fide third party acquires the corresponding right of the copyright. The original right holder has the right to claim compensation for the loss caused by the unauthorized disposition.
【学位授予单位】：辽宁大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2013
【分类号】：D923.41

【参考文献】