论我国商品化权保护模式的选择

发布时间：2018-04-17 23:24

本文选题：商品化权 + 真实人物商品化权　；参考：《宁波大学》2014年硕士论文

【摘要】：商品化权是产生于现代社会经济生活中的一种新型权利形态，目前，我国实务界与理论界虽有所涉及，，但相关理论还不成熟。纵观国内外相关法律实践及现有的研究成果，主流学说将商品化权界定为一种新型的知识产权，基于真实人物形象和虚拟角色商品化权的各自特点，多数学者主张人格权制度与知识产权制度的分散保护模式。商品化权的法律保护因总是被局限在现有的民事权利体系框架内而存在大量的空白和漏洞。本文立足于我国目前商品化权分散于人格权制度与知识产权制度保护的不足，运用比较研究的方法，结合其他国家和地区的立法实践，针对我国商品化权的现实，提出建立独立的商品化权保护模式并进行探讨，最后对商品化权的法律保护模式进行了具体设想。本文综合运用比较分析法、文献研究法、价值分析法等方法以期能较为全面地对商品化权制度的相关问题进行深入探讨，试图寻找最优的商品化权保护模式，以平衡各方利益，节约司法成本。本文结构如下：第一章介绍何为商品化并追溯商品化权的起源等问题，重点是在借鉴国内其他学者的研究成果的基础上，结合商品化权的分类重新界定商品化权的内涵。第二章主要论证商品化权存在的理论依据和商品化权应作为一项独立的权利而存在，提出设立独立的商品化权保护模式的初步论断。第三章根据第一章商品化权的分类对国外商品化权保护模式加以评述，结合前述各章的理论分析，对我国商品化权的保护模式进行具体构建。
[Abstract]:The right of commercialization is a new form of right which comes into being in the modern social and economic life. At present, although there is something involved in the field of practice and theory in our country, the relevant theories are still immature.Throughout the relevant legal practice and existing research results at home and abroad, the mainstream theory defines the commercialization right as a new type of intellectual property, based on the respective characteristics of the real character image and the virtual character commercialization right.Most scholars advocate the decentralized protection model of personality right system and intellectual property system.There are a lot of gaps and loopholes in the legal protection of the commercial right because it is always confined to the existing civil rights system.This paper is based on the deficiency of the commercial right scattered in the protection of personality right system and intellectual property right system at present in our country, using the method of comparative research, combining with the legislative practice of other countries and regions, aiming at the reality of the commercialization right in our country.This paper puts forward an independent protection mode of commercialization right and discusses it. Finally, it conceive the legal protection mode of commercial right.This article synthetically uses the comparative analysis method, the literature research method, the value analysis method and so on to hope to carry on the thorough discussion to the commercial right system correlation question comprehensively, attempts to seek the best commercial right protection pattern, in order to balance each party's benefit.Save the cost of justice.The structure of this paper is as follows:The first chapter introduces what is commoditization and traces the origin of the right of commercialization and so on. The emphasis is to redefine the connotation of the right of commercialization on the basis of referring to the research results of other domestic scholars and combining the classification of the right of commercialization.The second chapter mainly demonstrates the theoretical basis of the existence of the right of commercialization and the existence of the right of commercialization as an independent right, and puts forward the preliminary conclusion of establishing an independent mode of protection of the right of commercialization.The third chapter according to the classification of the first chapter of the commercial right protection model of foreign commercial rights to comment, combined with the theoretical analysis of the previous chapters, the protection model of commercial rights in China is built.
【学位授予单位】：宁波大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2014
【分类号】：D923.4

【相似文献】