我国知识产权行为保全存在的问题及完善建议

发布时间：2018-04-19 01:10

  本文选题：知识产权 + 行为保全　； 参考：《南昌大学》2017年硕士论文

【摘要】：在知识产权领域中,行为保全制度作为一种临时性救济程序起到了至关重要的作用。知识产权行为保全作为民事行为保全制度的重要组成部分是由2001年引入中国并正式在法律条文中确立的,当时传统知识产权法三大领域,即《专利法》、《商标法》和《著作权法》都进行了修订并增加“诉前临时措施”的规定,从而正式形成了知识产权行为保全制度并确立其重要地位。在以后的司法实践中,知识产权行为保全制度不断得到丰富和发展,其中2012年颁布的新《民事诉讼法》和2015年发布的《关于审查知识产权与竞争纠纷行为保全案件适用法律若干问题的解释(征求意见稿)》对该制度各个环节进行了系统和全面的规定,在很大程度上为行为保全制度在司法实践中的正确运用奠定了基础和提供了指导。但我国知识产权纠纷案件复杂,而行为保全制度起步较晚,相关规定不够明确和统一,尚有诸多问题需要完善。为促进我国知识产权行为保全制度的完善,本文首先从概念特征、特殊性、构成要件与法律适用等方面对我国知识产权行为保全制度进行了概述,其次通过对比考察英美、大陆等域外法系中知识产权行为保全制度,总结了国外先进的司法经验,为我国知识产权行为保全的完善提供了借鉴和启示,再次根据我国立法和执行现状分析了审查要件、担保、执行和救济程序等方面存在的问题,最后针对上述问题分别提出相应的完善建议,本文的讨论旨在健全我国知识产权行为保全制度并促进其在司法实践中的运用。
[Abstract]:In the field of intellectual property rights, the act preservation system plays a vital role as a temporary relief procedure.As an important part of the civil act preservation system, the preservation of intellectual property acts was introduced into China in 2001 and formally established in the legal provisions. At that time, there were three major areas of traditional intellectual property law.In other words, the Patent Law, the Trademark Law and the copyright Law have been amended and the provisions of "interim measures before lawsuit" have been added, thus formally forming the intellectual property protection system and establishing its important position.In the later judicial practice, the preservation system of intellectual property acts has been enriched and developed continuously.Of these, the new Code of Civil procedure promulgated in 2012 and the explanation (draft for comments) issued in 2015 on certain issues applicable to the review of the applicable law in cases of intellectual property rights and preservation of competition disputes have carried out various aspects of the system.Systematic and comprehensive provisions,To a great extent, it lays a foundation and provides guidance for the correct application of the act preservation system in judicial practice.However, the intellectual property dispute cases in China are complex, and the behavior preservation system starts late, the relevant regulations are not clear and unified, and there are still many problems to be improved.In order to promote the perfection of the preservation system of intellectual property act in our country, this paper firstly summarizes the preservation system of intellectual property act in our country from the aspects of concept characteristics, particularity, constitutive elements and application of law, and then makes a comparative study on the preservation system of intellectual property act in Britain and the United States.The preservation system of intellectual property acts in the mainland and other extraterritorial legal systems summarizes the advanced judicial experience of foreign countries and provides reference and inspiration for the perfection of the preservation of intellectual property acts in our country, and then analyzes the examination elements according to the current situation of legislation and implementation of our country.In the end, the author puts forward corresponding suggestions for the above problems. The purpose of this paper is to perfect the preservation system of intellectual property act in our country and to promote its application in judicial practice.
【学位授予单位】：南昌大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2017
【分类号】：D923.4;D925.1

【参考文献】

中国期刊全文数据库 前10条

1 郑本香;;民事诉讼行为保全制度的细节化探究——以新民事诉讼法实施为契机[J];法制博览(中旬刊);2013年05期

2 冀宗儒;徐辉;;论民事诉讼保全制度功能的最大化[J];当代法学;2013年01期

3 陈小炜;施晓楠;;论行为保全制度的内涵界定和价值考量[J];改革与开放;2010年09期

4 隋秀娟;;比较法视野中的诉讼行为保全制度的研究[J];淮北职业技术学院学报;2010年02期

5 柴若冰;;完善我国民事诉讼法行为保全制度探析[J];河北大学成人教育学院学报;2010年01期

6 方义;;我国民事诉讼行为保全制度的建立及其法律价值[J];学术交流;2009年02期

7 王乐;;“行为保全”的法律性质辨析[J];成都大学学报(社会科学版);2008年02期

8 张江涛,薛波;美国中间禁令探讨[J];北京理工大学学报(社会科学版);2005年03期

9 李仕春;;民事保全程序基本问题研究[J];中外法学;2005年01期

10 潘伟;关于知识产权诉前行为保全的法律思考[J];法律适用;2004年04期

中国博士学位论文全文数据库 前1条

1 王福华;民事保全制度研究[D];中国政法大学;2005年

，

本文编号：1770906