知识产权保护对FDI的影响研究

发布时间：2018-04-24 07:15

本文选题：OLI理论 + 知识产权保护　；参考：《集美大学》2017年硕士论文

【摘要】：在开放经济环境下,知识产权保护强度对外商直接投资的影响越来越大,如何利用外商直接投资一直是发展中国家经济发展的一个重要战略。本文首先在传统国际生产折衷理论(OLI)框架下探讨知识产权保护对FDI的影响,然后利用实证分析对理论分析进行检验。本文利用40个国家2003-2012年的面板数据,选取WEF公布的《全球竞争力报告》报告中知识产权保护的指标作为本文核心解释变量知识产权保护的实际指标,并且加入了五个控制变量一起进行实证分析,五个控制变量分别为:东道国的市场规模(GDP)、对外开放水平(OPEN)、劳动力成本(AVS)、基础设施(TCAR)、以及城市化水平(URB)。实证分析分为两个层面:首先从整体层面上,不划分FDI的具体行业,并将样本分为世界、发达国家以及发展中国家三组样本分别进行回归,其次从行业层面上,分别对发达国家与发展中国家的十个具体行业进行回归分析比较。实证分析结果显示:在整体层面上,在世界范围内、发达国家以及发展中国家三组样本内,知识产权保护对于FDI有显著的正影响;在行业层面上,具体行业有着不同的结果:电力、燃气及水的生产和供应业、批发零售业、金融业、房地产业、租赁和商务服务业,对比发达国家与发展中国家,知识产权对FDI在1%、5%的不同程度水平下显著为正,即为在这些行业内,增强知识产权保护有利于FDI的流入;对于农、林、牧、渔业这一行业来说,发达国家的知识产权对FDI在1%的水平下显著为负,发展中国家的知识产权对FDI在1%的水平下显著为正;对于采矿业、制造业、建筑业、住宿和餐饮业以及交通运输仓储和邮政业来说,发达国家与发展中国家的知识产权对FDI的影响均为正向的影响。最后本文根据实证结果,就发展中国家如何吸引外商直接投资提出了相应的政策建议。
[Abstract]:In the open economy environment, the intensity of intellectual property protection has more and more influence on foreign direct investment (FDI). How to make use of FDI has always been an important strategy for the economic development of developing countries. This paper first discusses the impact of intellectual property protection on FDI under the framework of traditional international production compromise theory, and then uses empirical analysis to test the theoretical analysis. Based on the panel data of 40 countries from 2003 to 2012, this paper selects the intellectual property protection indicators in the Global Competitiveness report published by WEF as the real indicators for the intellectual property protection of the core explanatory variables in this paper. And five control variables are added to the empirical analysis. The five control variables are as follows: market size of host country, open level, labor cost and AVS, infrastructure, and urbanization level. The empirical analysis is divided into two levels: first of all, from the overall level, do not divide the specific industries of FDI, and divide the samples into the world, developed and developing countries for regression, and then from the industry level. Ten specific industries in developed and developing countries were analyzed by regression analysis. The results of empirical analysis show that intellectual property protection has a significant positive impact on FDI at the global level and in three groups of samples from developed and developing countries; at the industry level, intellectual property protection has a significant positive impact on FDI. Specific industries have different outcomes: electricity, gas and water production and supply, wholesale and retail, finance, real estate, leasing and business services, compared with developed and developing countries, Intellectual property rights are significantly positive for FDI at different levels of 1% or 5%, that is, in these industries, enhanced intellectual property protection is conducive to the inflow of FDI; for agriculture, forestry, animal husbandry, and fisheries, Intellectual property rights in developed countries are significantly negative for FDI at 1%, while those in developing countries are significantly positive at 1% of FDI; for mining, manufacturing, construction, The impact of intellectual property rights on FDI in both developed and developing countries is positive for accommodation and catering as well as transportation, storage and postal services. Finally, according to the empirical results, this paper puts forward corresponding policy recommendations on how to attract FDI in developing countries.
【学位授予单位】：集美大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2017
【分类号】：F831.6;F204

【参考文献】