论美国专利纠纷调解制度及其对我国的启示
发布时间:2018-04-27 10:47
本文选题:专利纠纷 + 纠纷替代解决 ; 参考:《湘潭大学》2013年硕士论文
【摘要】:知识产权是传统民法理论中的无形财产权,是智力劳动成果或创造性的精神财富。随着信息技术的迅猛发展以及现代化科技时代的到来,作为知识产权之一的专利权的影响力不断扩大,,由此产生的专利纠纷也越来越多。在传统的诉讼方式已经难以契合专利纠纷解决各种特殊要求的形势下,美国逐步建立起的替代性纠纷解决机制更加凸显了其优势,调解就是其中运用最广泛的方式之一。调解解决专利纠纷不仅能缓解司法资源日益紧张的状况,并且能在调解的过程中为对立的双方寻求共同利益,维持相对良好的关系,甚至创造更多的发展机会。方便、快捷、高效地解决专利纠纷是每一个专利权人追求的价值目标。避开形式主义,运用简易的程序在短时间内解决专利纠纷,对时间周期短的专利权来说尤为重要。调解的低成本和快捷性也让当事人得以将更多的资源投入到正常的生产经营当中。美国专利纠纷调解的特点是通过各种民间调解机构进行调解,这类机构具有很强的专业性,能够很好地帮助专利纠纷当事人进行沟通与交流,为专利纠纷的解决提供可行方案。近年来,我国的民间调解制度受到了越来越广泛的重视,但对专利纠纷的调解却仍然处于起步探索阶段,调解解决纠纷的方式没有被广泛地运用起来,调解的优势也没有发挥出来,现状不尽如人意。因此,如何立足于我国自身特点,借鉴美国经验,利用调解来解决专利纠纷,让专利纠纷调解逐渐规模化、体系化成了亟待解决的问题。有鉴于此,本文首先介绍了美国专利纠纷调解制度的发展历史、相关立法及调解的原则、程序,探讨了美国专利纠纷调解的实践情况,并分析了专利纠纷调解的优势与必要性;其次,通过了解我国专利纠纷调解的现状,剖析其中存在的问题及产生问题的原因,并试图结合美国专利纠纷调解制度发展的经验,从机构、原则、程序几个方面对构建我国专利纠纷调解制度提出可行性建议。
[Abstract]:Intellectual property is the intangible property right in the traditional civil law theory, and it is the intellectual labor achievement or creative spiritual wealth. With the rapid development of information technology and the arrival of modern science and technology era, as one of the intellectual property rights, the impact of patent rights is expanding, resulting in more and more patent disputes. Under the situation that it is difficult for the traditional litigation methods to meet the special requirements of patent dispute resolution, the alternative dispute resolution mechanism gradually established in the United States highlights its advantages, and mediation is one of the most widely used methods. Mediation and resolution of patent disputes can not only alleviate the increasingly tight situation of judicial resources, but also seek common interests for opposing parties in the process of mediation, maintain a relatively good relationship, and even create more development opportunities. Solving patent disputes conveniently, quickly and efficiently is the value goal that every patentee pursues. Avoiding formalism and using simple procedures to solve patent disputes in a short time are particularly important for patent rights with short time periods. The low cost and rapidity of mediation also enable the parties to put more resources into normal production and operation. The characteristic of patent dispute mediation in the United States is to mediate through various folk mediation institutions, which are highly professional and can help the patent dispute parties to communicate and communicate well, and to provide feasible solutions to patent disputes. In recent years, China's folk mediation system has been paid more and more attention, but the mediation of patent disputes is still in the initial stage of exploration, mediation to resolve disputes has not been widely used. Mediation advantages have not been brought into play, the status quo is not satisfactory. Therefore, based on our own characteristics, drawing lessons from the experience of the United States, the use of mediation to resolve patent disputes, so that patent dispute mediation gradually scale, the system has become a problem to be solved. In view of this, this paper first introduces the history of patent dispute mediation system in the United States, the relevant legislation and mediation principles, procedures, discusses the practice of patent dispute mediation in the United States, and analyzes the advantages and necessity of patent dispute mediation. Secondly, through understanding the current situation of patent dispute mediation in China, analyzing the existing problems and the causes of the problems, and trying to combine the experience of the development of the patent dispute mediation system in the United States, from the institutions, principles, Several aspects of the procedure for the construction of patent dispute mediation system feasibility suggestions.
【学位授予单位】:湘潭大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2013
【分类号】:D971.2;DD913
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前8条
1 曾彤;知识产权纠纷的诉讼外处理[J];中华商标;2002年02期
2 江伟,廖永安;简论人民调解协议的性质与效力[J];法学杂志;2003年02期
3 郭玉军;孙敏洁;;美国诉讼和解与中国法院调解之比较研究[J];法学评论;2006年02期
4 樊培栋;;论ADR在知识产权纠纷解决中的应用[J];科学之友(B版);2007年11期
5 俞晓霞,金亦红;重构知识产权诉讼调解制度[J];人民司法;2002年10期
6 李广辉,孙永军;关于大调解之法理思考[J];汕头大学学报;2002年03期
7 范愉;当代中国非诉讼纠纷解决机制的完善与发展[J];学海;2003年01期
8 廖永安;诉讼内外纠纷解决机制的协调与整合[J];云南大学学报(法学版);2004年03期
本文编号:1810422
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/zhishichanquanfa/1810422.html