知识产权技术意见证据的相关问题研究

发布时间：2018-04-30 16:41

本文选题：知识产权技术意见 + 证据界定　；参考：《中国政法大学》2017年硕士论文

【摘要】：在知识经济的时代,知识产权可谓是国家提高核心竞争力的战略资源。党的十八大提出“加强知识产权保护”的重大命题,加强知识产权保护是实行“创新驱动发展战略”的必要条件。近些年,知识产权案件逐年递增,各地知识产权法院不断增高的判赔数额也受到众多知识产权从业者的关注。一方面,说明国家提升了对知识产权保护的力度;另一方面,说明法官在审理知识产权诉讼案件时,无论是在事实认定还是法律适用都展现出应有的水准与自信。但不可忽视的是,知识产权诉讼涉及的专门性问题复杂且种类繁多,单一法学背景的事实认定者来把握技术问题仍存在着现实困难。目前,针对知识产权诉讼中技术问题,人民法院基本形成较为完善的技术调查、技术咨询、专家陪审和技术鉴定“四位一体”的技术事实调查认定体系。如此多种的技术问题查明方法势必会形成多种多样的技术问题意见书,如鉴定意见、专家咨询意见、专家辅助人意见,甚至还有技术审查意见、技术调查官意见、法官评议意见等。实践中,事实认定者很难对上述意见书的证据属性以及适用规则达成统一的认识,学理上也没有系统的划分,这也是本文的意义所在。首先,笔者对多种类知识产权技术意见进行划分,将技术意见划分为“技术专家意见”和“法庭专家意见”两类。其次,结合实践中案例,具体分析每种技术意见的证据形式。最后,通过查阅文献与论文写作过程,知识产权技术意见的部分领域引发了笔者的思考,抛砖引玉,希望能得到更多学者的共鸣或争论,从而得到进一步的研究。本文第一部分引入“知识产权技术意见”的概念并进行简单的介绍和种类的划分,将知识产权技术意见划分为知识产权技术专家意见和法庭专家意见,系统总结了知识产权技术意见的特征。第二部分是针对知识产权技术专家意见的实证研究以及证据的界定。实证研究从委托主体、委托机构和专家意见公信力三方面进行数据统计并简要评析。由于案例材料的有限性,评析的内容相较数据的比例研究意义更大。另外,对知识产权技术专家意见进行证据的界定。第三部分是对知识产权法庭专家意见证据可能性的分析,首先对不同种类的法庭专家意见进行详细介绍。其次,总结出知识产权诉讼引入法庭专家的意义。最后,分别对技术调查官意见、技术审核意见和专家陪审员意见进行证据可能性分析第四部分是根据知识产权技术意见引发的思考,包括由技术专家意见研究引发的思考和由法庭专家意见研究引发的思考。
[Abstract]:In the era of knowledge economy, intellectual property is a strategic resource for the country to improve its core competitiveness. The 18th National Congress of the Communist Party of China put forward the important proposition of "strengthening the protection of intellectual property rights", and strengthening the protection of intellectual property rights is a necessary condition for the implementation of "innovation-driven development strategy". In recent years, intellectual property cases have been increasing year by year, and the increasing number of awards and indemnities by local intellectual property courts has also attracted the attention of many intellectual property practitioners. On the one hand, it shows that the state has enhanced the protection of intellectual property rights; on the other hand, it shows that judges in the trial of intellectual property litigation cases, whether in fact or in the application of the law all show due standards and self-confidence. However, it can not be ignored that the specialized problems involved in intellectual property litigation are complex and varied, and it is still difficult for the fact holders with a single legal background to grasp the technical problems. At present, in view of the technical problems in intellectual property litigation, the people's court has basically formed a relatively perfect system of technical investigation, technical consultation, expert jury and technical appraisal. Such a variety of technical problem identification methods are bound to form a variety of technical opinion opinions, such as expert opinions, expert advice, expert auxiliaries' opinions, and even technical review opinions, technical survey officers' opinions, A judge's opinion, etc. In practice, it is difficult for the facts to have a unified understanding of the evidentiary attributes and applicable rules of the above submissions, and there is no systematic division in theory, which is also the significance of this paper. First of all, the author divides the technical opinions of various kinds of intellectual property rights into two types: technical expert opinion and court expert opinion. Secondly, combined with practical cases, the concrete analysis of each technical opinion of the evidence form. Finally, by consulting the literature and the writing process of the thesis, some areas of intellectual property technical opinions have aroused the author's thinking, and the author hopes to get more scholars' resonance or debate, and thus get further research. The first part of this paper introduces the concept of "technical opinion on intellectual property" and makes a brief introduction and classification, and divides the technical opinion of intellectual property into expert opinion of intellectual property technology and expert opinion of court. The characteristics of intellectual property technical opinions are summarized systematically. The second part is the empirical research and the definition of evidence in view of intellectual property technical expert opinion. The empirical study analyzes and analyzes the data from three aspects: the principal body, the agency and the credibility of the expert opinion. Due to the limitation of case materials, the content of assessment is more significant than the proportion of data. In addition, the intellectual property rights technical expert opinion to carry on the evidence definition. The third part is the analysis of the possibility of the expert opinion of intellectual property court. Secondly, it summarizes the significance of introducing court experts into intellectual property litigation. Finally, the author analyzes the possibility of evidence from the opinions of technical investigation officers, technical audit opinions and expert jurors respectively. The fourth part is based on the thinking caused by the technical opinions on intellectual property rights. It includes the thinking caused by the technical expert opinion research and the court expert opinion research.
【学位授予单位】：中国政法大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2017
【分类号】：D923.4

【相似文献】