“通知-移除”规则在专利领域的适用性分析

发布时间：2018-05-01 23:38

本文选题：“通知-移除”规则 + 专利　；参考：《法商研究》2017年06期

【摘要】：我国立法和司法实践将著作权领域的"通知-移除"规则应用于专利领域的做法超越了美、日、欧等发达国家(地区)和知识产权国际新规则的保护水准。"通知-移除"规则的适用有其特定范围和条件,需考虑网络服务提供商对侵权行为的"控制能力""直接获益""监控成本"及"预期损失"等因素,"合格"通知即致认知是其适用的隐含前提。在专利领域适用"通知-移除"规则会引发诸多问题:难以满足有关适用前提,不符合效益原则并导致利益失衡、使网络服务提供商越位承担专利侵权实质审查职责、架空专利诉前禁令制度、引发"专利流氓"、阻滞我国互联网经济的发展。建议将"通知-移除"规则改造为"通知-必要措施"规则以适用于专利领域,同时增设配套性规定以平衡各方利益,但不宜引入"反通知-恢复"以及担保程序。
[Abstract]:In our country's legislation and judicial practice, the "Notification-removal" rules in the field of copyright are applied to the patent field, surpassing the level of protection of the new international rules of the developed countries (regions) and intellectual property rights, such as the United States, Japan, Europe and so on. " Notification-removal "rules have their specific scope and conditions for their application," It is necessary to consider such factors as "control ability", "direct benefit", "monitoring cost" and "expected loss" of network service provider to tort, and "qualified" notice is the implicit premise of its application. The application of the "Notification-removal" rule in the field of patent will lead to many problems: it is difficult to meet the relevant applicable premise, does not conform to the principle of benefit and leads to the imbalance of interests, which makes the network service provider offside the responsibility of substantive examination of patent infringement. The system of pre-litigation injunction of overhead patent leads to patent hooligan and blocks the development of internet economy in our country. It is suggested that the "Notification-remove" rule should be transformed into "Notification-necessary measures" rule to apply to the patent field, and that a matching provision should be added to balance the interests of the parties, but it is not appropriate to introduce "counter-notice-recovery" and security procedures.
【作者单位】：中南财经政法大学法学院/知识产权研究中心;
【基金】：国家社会科学基金项目(17BFX207)
【分类号】：D923.42

【相似文献】