实用艺术作品的著作权保护研究

发布时间：2018-05-02 03:56

本文选题：实用艺术作品 + 著作权　；参考：《中国政法大学》2015年硕士论文

【摘要】：实用艺术作品作为较新的作品类型,在现行著作权法中的规定并不明确,著作权法第三次修改草案将实用艺术作品列为独立的作品类型,但是实用艺术作品的著作权保护在理论上和实践中仍然存在很多争议问题,本文试图通过研究相关问题得出结论,为实用艺术作品的司法实践提供理论指导和建议。本文运用比较分析的方法,比较了美国、法国、日本三个国家关于实用艺术作品保护范围的立法规定和司法实践,三个国家代表了实用艺术作品著作权保护制度发展的不同阶段以及持有的不同态度,对我国相关法律规定的完善具有重要意义。同时运用历史分析的方法,纵观我国对实用艺术作品著作权保护从无到有的发展历程,不同阶段关注和讨论的不同问题,从正当性论证到具体适用问题的研究,实用艺术作品著作权保护的理论得到不断的丰富和完善。另外,本文还引用了较多的国内外案例,从司法实践的角度寻找和分析问题,更贴近实际,更好地为实践提供借鉴。本文主体部分分为六个章节,第一章主要根据实用艺术作品定义的现有研究成果,分析实用艺术作品的基本特征和属性,从而得出实用艺术作品的定义,列举实用艺术作品的表现形式。第二章介绍了思想表达两分法原则、实用艺术作品和外观设计专利的协调和实用艺术作品产业价值,论证了实用艺术作品的可著作权性。第三章深入介绍美国、法国、日本关于实用艺术作品实用要素和艺术要素是否可分离的法律规定和司法实践,比较各国做法的利弊,为探寻适合我国的做法提供依据。第四章分析实用艺术作品艺术性判断的实质,论证实用艺术作品的艺术性判断标准应该等同于美术作品艺术性的判断标准。第五章从实践的角度出发,提出实用艺术作品认定的两个步骤,即判断是否属于实用艺术品和判断是否具有独创性、可复制性,以及侵权判断中应适当排除实用要素的影响,在与外观设计专利的协调上,论证了实用艺术作品和外观设计专利相互独立,说明了实施已失效的外观设计专利不侵犯著作权的问题等。第六章结论部分,总结了本文关于实用艺术作品的主要观点,为更好地保护实用艺术作品权利人的权利、鼓励实用艺术作品的创新以及促进实用艺术作品行业的健康发展,对实用艺术作品著作权保护的实践提出来可行的建议。
[Abstract]:As a relatively new type of work, practical art works are not clearly defined in the current copyright Law. The third Amendment draft of the copyright Law lists the works of practical art as an independent type of work. However, there are still many controversial issues in the theory and practice of copyright protection of practical works of art. This paper tries to draw a conclusion by studying the relevant issues, and provides theoretical guidance and suggestions for the judicial practice of practical works of art. This paper, by means of comparative analysis, compares the legislative provisions and judicial practices of the United States, France and Japan on the scope of protection of practical works of art. The three countries represent different stages of the development of the copyright protection system of practical works of art and hold different attitudes, which is of great significance to the perfection of the relevant laws and regulations of our country. At the same time, by using the method of historical analysis, the author makes a general survey of the development of copyright protection of practical works of art in our country, the different problems concerned and discussed in different stages, from the justification argument to the study of concrete application. The theory of copyright protection of practical works of art has been continuously enriched and perfected. In addition, this paper also cited more domestic and foreign cases, from the point of view of judicial practice to find and analyze the problem, closer to the reality, a better reference for practice. The main body of this paper is divided into six chapters. The first chapter mainly analyzes the basic characteristics and attributes of practical works of art according to the existing research results of the definition of practical works of art, so as to obtain the definition of practical works of art. Enumerate the forms of expression of a practical work of art. The second chapter introduces the principle of dichotomy of thought expression, the coordination of practical art works and design patents, and the industrial value of practical works of art, and demonstrates the copyright of practical works of art. The third chapter deeply introduces the legal provisions and judicial practice of the United States, France and Japan on the separation of practical elements and artistic elements of practical works of art, compares the advantages and disadvantages of the practices of various countries, and provides the basis for exploring the practice suitable for our country. The fourth chapter analyzes the essence of the artistic judgment of practical works of art, and proves that the standard of judging the artistry of practical works of art should be equal to that of artistic works of fine arts. The fifth chapter puts forward two steps to identify practical works of art from the point of view of practice, that is, to judge whether the works belong to practical works of art and whether they are original, to be replicable, and to exclude the influence of practical elements in tort judgment. In coordination with the design patent, this paper demonstrates the independence between the practical art work and the design patent, and explains the problem that the invalid design patent does not infringe the copyright, etc. In the last part of chapter six, the author summarizes the main views of this paper on practical works of art, in order to better protect the rights of the right holders of practical works of art, to encourage the innovation of practical works of art and to promote the healthy development of the industry of practical works of art. Some feasible suggestions are put forward for the practice of copyright protection of practical works of art.
【学位授予单位】：中国政法大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2015
【分类号】：D923.41

【参考文献】