论经营者集中救济措施中的知识产权许可

发布时间：2018-05-05 17:10

本文选题：知识产权许可 + 合并救济措施　；参考：《中外法学》2017年01期

【摘要】：在经营者集中反垄断制度中,与知识产权相关的救济措施主要为剥离和许可。科技发展日新月异,经营者因知识产权而拥有的竞争优势在瞬息万变的市场中具有更多的不确定性,相较于剥离,知识产权许可能够更好地适应这种不确定性。从欧美经验看,能否采用知识产权许可作为救济措施,主要应考量和平衡两方面因素,其一为竞争与效率,其二为反垄断的事前控制和事后控制。知识产权许可的有效性取决于许可价格、类型、范围等因素。我国目前采用知识产权许可作为救济措施的案件主要是跨国并购案,涉及的并购方多为在相关领域掌握核心技术的大型跨国公司。借鉴欧美经验,合理、有效地运用知识产权许可救济措施,对保证未来我国相关市场的有效竞争具有重要意义。
[Abstract]:In the centralized anti-monopoly system, the main relief measures related to intellectual property rights are divestiture and licensing. With the rapid development of science and technology, the competitive advantage of the operator because of intellectual property has more uncertainty in the rapidly changing market. Compared with stripping, intellectual property license can better adapt to this uncertainty. From the experience of Europe and America, it is necessary to consider and balance two factors, one is competition and efficiency, the other is pre-control and post-control of anti-monopoly. The validity of intellectual property licensing depends on the licensing price, type, scope and other factors. At present, the cases of adopting intellectual property license as relief measures are mainly transnational merger and acquisition cases, and the M & A parties involved are mostly large multinational corporations that master the core technology in relevant fields. It is of great significance to apply the remedy measures of intellectual property license reasonably and effectively for reference to the experience of Europe and the United States in order to ensure the effective competition of relevant markets in our country in the future.
【作者单位】：中国人民大学法学院;
【分类号】：D923.4

【相似文献】