孤儿作品合理使用法律问题研究

发布时间：2018-05-08 02:08

本文选题：Google侵权案 + 孤儿作品　；参考：《延边大学》2017年硕士论文

【摘要】：孤儿作品并不是一个法律概念,仅仅是对ORPHAN WORKS字面翻译所得。早期我国学者使用"无主作品"指代这种难以找到权利人,难以行使著作权的作品。本文为求统一,一致以孤儿作品进行阐述。"互联网+"使得孤儿作品不仅仅以书本的方式呈现,更多的是利用技术优势以一种数据存储的方式摆脱束之高阁的命运。文化软实力的竞争也使各国更注重孤儿作品的价值彰显,如何避免资源漏洞完成文化传承却又不侵犯相关人的权利已成为各国不可回避的难题。本文内容上从五个部分研究孤儿作品合理使用法律问题。第一章是绪论,从Google侵权案引出孤儿作品,然后简要介绍国内外学者对于孤儿作品问题的研究现状,并且指出本文的研究范围与研究方法。第二章是孤儿作品概述,因为我国不存在"孤儿作品"这一法律术语,便先是提出其他国家孤儿作品的概念作为参考。然后是对孤儿作品使用过程中的核心问题进行概括。最后从我国《著作权法》、著作权相关条例以及《著作权修订草案送审稿》中关于孤儿作品法律的规定来展示我国孤儿作品的法律现状。第三章是借鉴国外知识产权规定较发达的国家的实践经验。包括美国、欧盟、加拿大、日本等国对孤儿作品的保护模式,对其适合我国国情的包括指定专门主体管理、例外限制图书馆、增设补偿增减之诉,以及纠纷解决时ADR、ODR模式加以重点分析,引以为鉴。第四章是针对我国孤儿作品的法律现状,结合别国成功实践得出的完善建议。包括从建立"淘宝"式集体管理、完善公益合理使用、细化付酬式补偿机制、建立多元的纠纷解决机制等多角度对我国孤儿作品的法律规定进行完善。第五章是对全篇文章的归纳总结。对本文的重点再次重申以加深印象。
[Abstract]:Orphan works are not a legal concept, but a literal translation of ORPHAN WORKS. In the early years, Chinese scholars referred to the works which were difficult to find the owner and to exercise the copyright. For the sake of unity, this article is expounded by orphans' works. " The Internet "makes orphan works not only appear in the form of books, but also use the advantage of technology to get rid of the fate of shelving in a way of data storage." The competition of cultural soft power also makes countries pay more attention to the value of orphaned works. How to avoid resource loopholes to complete cultural heritage without infringing the rights of related people has become an unavoidable problem. The content of this paper from five parts of the Orphan works reasonable use of legal issues. The first chapter is the introduction, which draws the orphan works from the case of Google infringement, then briefly introduces the domestic and foreign scholars' research status of orphans' works, and points out the scope and research methods of this paper. The second chapter is an overview of orphans' works, because there is no legal term "orphan works" in China, we first put forward the concept of orphans' works in other countries as a reference. Then it generalizes the core problems in the process of using orphan works. Finally, the present legal situation of orphan works in China is demonstrated from the provisions of the copyright Law, the relevant regulations of copyright and the revised draft of copyright submitted for review. The third chapter is to draw lessons from the practical experience of foreign countries with more developed intellectual property provisions. Including the American, European Union, Canada, Japan and other countries to the protection model of orphan works, including the designated special subject management, the exception of the library, the addition of compensation increase or decrease to the national conditions of our country. And the ADRN ODR model of dispute resolution to focus on analysis, learn from. The fourth chapter is based on the legal situation of orphans in China, combined with the successful practice of other countries to improve the recommendations. Including the establishment of "Taobao" type of collective management, improve the rational use of public goods, fine pay compensation mechanism, the establishment of multiple dispute resolution mechanism and other aspects to improve the legal provisions of orphan works in China. The fifth chapter is the summary of the whole article. The emphasis of this article is reiterated again to deepen the impression.
【学位授予单位】：延边大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2017
【分类号】：D923.41

【相似文献】