知识产权间接侵权连带赔偿责任的反思与重构

发布时间：2018-05-10 22:26

本文选题：间接侵权 + 共同侵权　；参考：《法律科学(西北政法大学学报)》2017年06期

【摘要】：按照共同侵权的基本原理,作为教唆、帮助侵权人的知识产权间接侵权人需要与直接侵权人承担连带赔偿责任。然而,由于现代知识产权间接侵权案件适用场域的特殊性,连带责任的适用面临着直接侵权难以确定和追偿机制失灵的技术难题,这些难题造成了利益失衡的问题。为了克服上述问题,比较法上出现了适当限制知识产权间接侵权中连带责任适用,利用知识产权法中特有的损害赔偿计算方法直接从间接侵权的角度计算损失的倾向。为此,需要在特定类型的知识产权间接侵权案件中对连带责任的适用设置例外,借鉴比较法上的经验,探索利用知识产权损害赔偿特殊计算方法限制连带责任的路径。
[Abstract]:According to the basic principle of joint infringement, as abettor, the indirect infringer of intellectual property right who helps the infringer needs to bear joint and several liability with the direct tortfeasor. However, due to the particularity of the applicable field in the indirect infringement cases of intellectual property rights, the application of joint and several liability is faced with the technical problems of the direct infringement and the failure of the recovery mechanism. These problems cause the imbalance of interests. In order to overcome the above problems, there is a tendency in comparative law to restrict the application of joint liability in the indirect infringement of intellectual property, and to calculate the loss directly from the angle of indirect infringement by using the special method of calculating damages in intellectual property law. Therefore, it is necessary to set up exceptions to the application of joint liability in specific cases of indirect infringement of intellectual property rights, and to explore the ways to limit joint and several liability by using the special calculation method of intellectual property damage compensation for reference from the experience of comparative law.
【作者单位】：厦门大学知识产权研究院;
【基金】：中国博士后科学基金第59批面上资助项目(2016M592084) 福建省社会科学规划项目(FJ2016C007)
【分类号】：D923.4

【相似文献】