网络服务提供者的直接侵权和间接侵权责任

发布时间：2018-05-11 06:21

本文选题：网络服务提供者 + 信息网络传播权　；参考：《中国政法大学》2013年硕士论文

【摘要】：信息网络传播权是伴随互联网产业飞速发展而产生的一种新权利。我国为落实《世界知识产权组织版权条约》和《世界知识产权组织表演和录音制品条约》而新增加一种著作邻接权：信息网络传播权。网络服务提供者既包括内容提供者,也包括中介服务提供者,在其经营活动中可能直接侵犯或间接侵犯信息网络传播权。直接侵权责任和间接侵权责任这一理论来源于英美法,间接侵权最早来自专利法,后通过法院判例延伸至著作权法领域。在全球范围内注重保护“信息网络传播权”的大背景下,“直接侵权”指未经许可擅自实施信息网络传播行为,“间接侵权”指行为人虽没有直接实施信息网络传播行为,但是行为人通过教唆、提供物质技术条件帮助直接侵权人。出于增强对著作权人权益保护的目的,多国的公共政策把这类行为也视为侵犯信息网络传播权。直接侵权和间接侵权的划分有助于实现著作权权利人、网络用户和信息网络传播者之问的利益平衡。我国虽然还没有从法律上正式采用直接侵权和间接侵权概念,但是学者们已经对此作了丰富的研究,最新的立法动向表明司法界已经接纳了这一理论。尽管我国有很多关于著作权间接侵权问题的理论研究,但还少有文章系统地比较比较网络服务提供者的直接侵权和间接侵权责任。本文在运用之前理论成果的基础上,通过理论分析、实证分析、文本分析等方法,讨论目前有关直接侵权和间接侵权的几大主要问题和争议,试图对这些问题有更加清晰的理解。本文主要分为四部分,第一部分为引言,伴随着互联网技术和网络经济的繁荣发展,网络侵权愈演愈烈。间接侵权理论的引入有助于实现权利人、信息网络传播者和网络用户之间的利益平衡。第二部分介绍直接侵权和间接侵权理论的域外渊源。第三部分介绍有关直接侵权和间接侵权的概念、区分标准等基本理论。第四部分探讨有关直接侵权和间接侵权的三个主要争议问题：间接侵权是否等同于共同侵权；直接侵权是否应当适用无过错责任而间接侵权应当适用过错责任；网络服务提供者的审查义务是否等于注意义务。第五部分为结论,总结了直接侵权和间接侵权的区分标准和具体归责原则,进一步强调该理论在实现利益相关者之间利益平衡的重要意义。
[Abstract]:With the rapid development of Internet industry, the right of information network communication is a new right. In order to implement the copyright Treaty of the World intellectual property Organization (WIPO) and the Treaty on performances and Phonograms of the World intellectual property Organization (WIPO), China has added a new right of adjacent works: the right to disseminate information on the Internet. Network service providers include both content providers and intermediary service providers, which may directly or indirectly violate the right of information network dissemination in their business activities. The theory of direct tort liability and indirect tort liability originates from the Anglo-American law. The indirect tort comes from patent law at first and then extends to copyright law through court cases. Under the background of paying attention to the protection of "information network communication right" in the world, "direct infringement" refers to the unauthorized implementation of information network communication behavior, and "indirect infringement" refers to the person who has not directly carried out information network communication behavior. However, the perpetrator provides material and technical conditions to help the direct infringer through instigation. For the purpose of strengthening the protection of the rights and interests of copyright owners, the public policies of many countries regard such acts as infringing on the right of information network dissemination. The division of direct and indirect infringement helps to balance the interests of copyright owners, network users and information network communicators. Although China has not formally adopted the concepts of direct and indirect tort in law, scholars have done a lot of research on it, and the latest legislative trend shows that the judicial circles have accepted this theory. Although there are many theoretical studies on indirect copyright infringement in China, there are few articles systematically comparing the direct infringement and indirect tort liability of network service provider. On the basis of previous theoretical achievements, this paper discusses several major issues and disputes concerning direct and indirect infringement through theoretical analysis, empirical analysis, text analysis and so on. Try to have a clearer understanding of these problems. This paper is mainly divided into four parts, the first part is the introduction, with the prosperity of Internet technology and network economy, network infringement becomes more and more serious. The introduction of indirect tort theory helps to balance the interests of the right holder, the information network disseminator and the network user. The second part introduces the theory of direct and indirect tort. The third part introduces the concepts of direct tort and indirect tort, and differentiates the basic theories. The fourth part discusses three main controversial issues concerning direct and indirect tort: whether indirect tort is equivalent to joint tort, whether direct tort should be applied to liability without fault, and whether indirect tort should be applied to fault liability; Whether the obligation of censorship of network service provider is equal to obligation of care. The fifth part is the conclusion, summarizes the distinction standard and specific imputation principle of direct and indirect tort, and further emphasizes the importance of this theory in realizing the balance of interests among stakeholders.
【学位授予单位】：中国政法大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2013
【分类号】：D923

【参考文献】