论我国专利默示许可规则的构建

发布时间：2018-05-14 02:37

本文选题：专利 + 侵权　；参考：《中国政法大学》2014年硕士论文

【摘要】：改革开放以来，我国的经济社会发展取得了长足的进步，随着商品贸易的流通性的不断增强，我国的专利相关的交易也越来越多。从1984年专利法立法至今，我国的专利理论和法律实践日渐丰富，各类专利案件也层出不穷，尽管我国的专利法已历经三次修订，但鉴于法律的滞后性、稳定性以及法律实践中的复杂性，现有的专利法律法规仍不能满足审判的需要。其中之一就是专利默示许可相关立法的空缺。专利默示许可，作为一种侵权抗辩理由，是指在一定情形下，专利权人以非明示许可的默示行为，让专利使用人产生其被允许使用该专利的合理信赖的一种专利许可形态。这与传统的明示许可的方式有很大的不同。从其行使方式来看，作为侵权抗辩理由，专利默示许可在一定程度上限制了专利权人的权利行使，但从知识产权保护的整体来看，保障和限制都是构建完善的知识产权保护制度的相辅相成的两个方面，只有有效的限制，防止权利滥用，才能更好的保护。尤其是在我国一直比较注重专利权的保护的传统下，协调好对专利权人的保护和社会公共利益的保障就显得更为重要，否则，过分强调专利权的专利制度最终将阻碍经济社会的发展。在一些国家，尤其是美国，专利默示许可理论早已出现并逐渐发展成熟，但鉴于我国知识产权法律制度建立起步较晚，这一理论在我国还处于萌芽阶段。这与我国实务中出现的相关专利案件的数量是分不开的。近十年来，我国的专利制度日臻成熟，相关的专利交易也越来越多，繁多的贸易也促发了专利侵权纠纷案件的多样化，专利默示许可相关的案件也逐渐显现。充分地运用好专利默示许可规则抗辩，有利于提升对相对人的保护，从而更好的促进交易安全，促进专利贸易的发展，也有利于在国际交往中更好的维护我国的知识产权利益。但目前我国的立法对此仍处于空白，相关的理论研究也较少，，至今仍未有一本专门研究中国专利默示许可的专著，只有少量的学术论文。因此，对专利默示许可规则进行探究，既是丰富法学理论的需要，也是法律实践的要求。专利默示许可的产生情形有很多，本文从中选取两种情形，即基于销售和基于标准产生的专利默示许可作为出发点进行探讨，选择这两点主要是考虑到目前我国法律规定和审判实践中的现实，希望能从现有的这两个典型情形出发，探求我国专利默示许可的一般规则，包括专利默示许可的认定条件、主要内容等，完善我国的专利默示许可理论。本文主要采用比较研究、案例分析等方法，力求从我国的专利侵权纠纷相关案件中窥探出我国专利默示许可规则的适用现状，同时结合国际上尤其是美国的专利默示许可理论，寻求一套适合我国的专利默示许可规则。
[Abstract]:Since the reform and opening up, China's economic and social development has made considerable progress. With the increasing circulation of commodity trade, there are more and more patent related transactions in China. Since the patent law legislation in 1984, patent theory and legal practice in our country have become more and more abundant, and various patent cases have emerged in endlessly. Although the patent law of our country has been revised three times, but in view of the lag of the law, Stability and complexity in legal practice, the existing patent laws and regulations still can not meet the needs of the trial. One of them is the absence of patent implied licensing legislation. Patent implied license, as a kind of infringement defense, refers to a patent license form in which the patentee acquires the reasonable trust that the patentee is allowed to use the patent with the implied act of non-express license under certain circumstances. This is very different from the traditional way of express permission. In terms of the way it is exercised, as a defense of infringement, patent implied license restricts the exercise of the rights of the patentee to a certain extent, but from the perspective of the overall protection of intellectual property rights, Protection and restriction are two complementary aspects of building a perfect intellectual property protection system. Only by effective restriction to prevent abuse of rights can better protection be achieved. In particular, under the tradition that our country has been paying more attention to the protection of patent rights, it is even more important to coordinate the protection of patentees and the protection of social and public interests. The patent system with too much emphasis on patent rights will eventually hinder the economic and social development. In some countries, especially in the United States, patent implied license theory has appeared and developed gradually, but in view of the late establishment of intellectual property legal system in China, this theory is still in its infancy. This is related to the number of patent cases in China's practice is inseparable. In recent ten years, the patent system of our country has matured day by day, the related patent transaction is more and more, the various trade has also promoted the diversification of the patent infringement dispute case, the patent implied license related case also gradually appears. Making full use of patent implied license rules defense is conducive to the promotion of the protection of the relative person, thus better promoting the transaction security, promoting the development of patent trade, and also conducive to the better protection of intellectual property rights interests in international exchanges. However, at present, the legislation of our country is still blank, the relevant theoretical research is also relatively few, so far there is not a monograph devoted to the implied license of patent in China, only a small number of academic papers. Therefore, the exploration of patent implied license rules is not only the need of rich legal theory, but also the requirement of legal practice. There are many cases of patent implied licensing. This paper selects two cases, namely, patent implied license based on sale and standard, as the starting point. The choice of these two points is mainly to take into account the current legal provisions and the reality of the trial practice in our country. We hope that we can explore the general rules of patent implied licensing in our country, including the conditions for the determination of patent implied licenses, from these two typical cases. The main content and so on, consummates our country patent implied license theory. This paper mainly uses comparative research, case analysis and other methods to explore the current situation of patent implied licensing rules in China from the relevant cases of patent infringement disputes in China, and combine with the patent implied licensing theory in the world, especially in the United States. To seek a set of patent tacit licensing rules suitable for our country.
【学位授予单位】：中国政法大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2014
【分类号】：D923.42

【参考文献】