改进专利技术侵权研究

发布时间：2018-05-14 12:50

本文选题：技术改进 + 专利侵权　；参考：《中南大学》2013年硕士论文

【摘要】：改进专利技术是指基于有效专利技术产品或专利方法,进行技术的优化与创造,形成具有新质和优势的先进新技术。改进专利技术侵权是指改进专利技术这种新技术可能形成的侵权行为。改进专利技术侵权的种类有直接侵权和间接侵权,而判断原则是全面覆盖原则和等同原则。专利技术改进作为一种技术创新方式在我国现阶段普遍存在,专利技术改进、技术创新和知识产权的交融、传承、互动关系,改进专利技术侵权问题研究等对我国现阶段技术创新和长远经济发展而言都具有重大的现实意义。现实性和复杂性使改进专利技术侵权难以认定,我国目前在这方面的立法及实践也还很不完善。专利保护的中心限定原则、周边限定原则、主题内容限定原则是专利侵权判断的基础,全面覆盖原则和等同原则、禁止反悔原则是改进专利技术侵权认定的一般原则,权利用尽、默认许可则是侵权抗辩原则。我国专利法第十一条中规定未权利化的改进专利技术构成侵权,虽能够保护权利人利益,但有违专利法第一条中鼓励创新的立法宗旨,也陷入了先进技术侵害落后技术权利的悖论。因此,日本政府在专利技术改进方面采取的适当干预策略,值得我国进行借鉴。目前我国的专利许可制度,还有在专利技术改进方面的立法定义、司法解释和执法实践,均需要细化和明确,增强其可操作性。
[Abstract]:The improvement of patent technology refers to the optimization and creation of technology based on effective patented technology products or patent methods, and the formation of advanced and new technologies with new qualities and advantages. Improving patent technology infringement refers to the possible infringement of the new technology of improving patent technology. There are direct infringement and indirect infringement in improving patent technology infringement, while the judgment principle is comprehensive coverage principle and equivalent principle. Patent technology improvement, as a way of technological innovation, is prevalent in our country at the present stage. Patent technology improvement, technological innovation and intellectual property rights are intermingled, inherited, and interacted with each other. It is of great practical significance to improve the research on patent technology infringement for the present stage of technological innovation and long-term economic development in China. The reality and complexity make it difficult to determine the patent infringement, and the legislation and practice in this respect are not perfect. The central principle of patent protection, the principle of peripheral limitation, the principle of subject content limitation are the basis of judging patent infringement, the principle of comprehensive coverage and the principle of equivalence, the principle of estoppel is the general principle to improve the recognition of patent technology infringement, The right is exhausted, the default permission is the infringement defense principle. Article 11 of the Patent Law of our country stipulates that the unauthorized improvement of patented technology constitutes an infringement, although it can protect the interests of the obligee, but it is contrary to the legislative purpose of encouraging innovation in Article 1 of the Patent Law. It is also caught in the paradox of advanced technology encroaching on backward technological rights. Therefore, the appropriate intervention strategy adopted by the Japanese government in patent technology improvement is worthy of our country's reference. At present, the patent licensing system in China, as well as the legislative definition of patent technology improvement, judicial interpretation and law enforcement practice, need to be refined and clear to enhance its operability.
【学位授予单位】：中南大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2013
【分类号】：D923.42

【参考文献】