知识产权惩罚性赔偿制度中故意认定的关键因素探析

发布时间：2018-05-16 01:26

本文选题：知识产权侵权 + 惩罚性赔偿　；参考：《知识产权》2017年05期

【摘要】：随着立法层面对知识产权惩罚性赔偿制度的引入,迫切需要对该制度构成要件的认定加以探讨。我国知识产权惩罚性赔偿制度以"侵权人故意""严重侵权后果"以及"权利人提出申请"为构成要件,最为核心的是如何通过被控侵权人的行为认定其存在故意的主观心态。通过被控侵权人的行为认定其存在故意的主观心态常见情形是,没有寻求和遵循称职律师的意见。在寻求和遵循适格律师意见过程中,故意侵权认定的标准出现了从宽松到严格再到相对宽松的演变历程,意图实现权利人与行为人之间的利益平衡,最终落脚到被控侵权人的动机或者意愿上。知识产权惩罚性赔偿制度构成要件最关键的抗辩理由是被控侵权人具有避免侵权的主观动机。从程序法角度而言,证明构成故意应当遵循优势证据的证明标准。
[Abstract]:With the introduction of the system of punitive damages to intellectual property, it is urgent to find out the elements of the system. The punitive damages system of intellectual property rights in our country takes "the tortfeasor intentionally", "serious tort consequence" and "the obligee's application" as the constituent elements. The most important thing is how to identify the intentional subjective mentality of the alleged infringer through the behavior of the alleged infringer. The subjective attitude of the alleged infringer is that he does not seek and follow the advice of a competent lawyer. In the process of seeking and following the opinion of qualified lawyers, the standard of intentional infringement has evolved from lenient to strict to relatively lenient, with the intention of achieving the balance of interests between the obligee and the perpetrator. The final settlement is on the motive or will of the alleged infringer. The most important defense of the constitution of punitive damages of intellectual property right is that the alleged infringer has subjective motive to avoid infringement. From the point of view of procedural law, proof of intent should follow the standard of proof of superiority.
【作者单位】：中南财经政法大学知识产权学院;国家知识产权局办公室政策研究处;
【分类号】：D923.4

【相似文献】