知识产权保护对我国高技术产业竞争力影响的实证研究
本文选题:知识产权保护 + 高技术产业竞争力 ; 参考:《浙江理工大学》2013年硕士论文
【摘要】:在经济全球化和科技高速发展的背景下,世界经济正由传统的以原材料、资本和大量耗能为特征的传统经济模式向以信息和知识为导向的知识经济模式转变。我国正处于社会经济转型的关键时期, 十二五‖规划明确指出,坚持把科技进步和创新作为加快转变经济发展方式的重要支撑,而知识产权制度作为激励创新和促进技术进步政策的重要性也日益凸显。长期以来,关于知识产权与经济的研究多集中于发达国家;关于中国知识产权保护强度测算的研究起步较晚且多侧重于理论方面;近年来,也不乏实证方面的研究,但都是分析其对FDI、国际贸易、经济增长等方面的影响。因此,结合中国国情,实证研究知识产权保护对高技术产业竞争力的影响具有重要的理论和现实意义。 首先,本文以知识产权保护为出发点,系统的梳理相关文献;然后,基于产业竞争力理论以及技术创新和技术扩散相关理论,研究知识产权保护对高技术产业竞争力的影响;接下来,对知识产权保护影响我国高技术产业竞争力进行了初步统计观察,在此基础上,展开实证研究分析中国知识产权对高技术产业的影响并分区域比较影响方向和程度;最后,,综合研究结论和我国知识产权保护现状特征,围绕提升知识产权保护水平、制定适度的知识产权保护制度和提升高技术产业竞争力等方面提出了相关政策建议。 总体回归结果表明,我国知识产权保护对高技术产业竞争力有显著的促进作用;政府的支持力度、投入研究的经费强度、人均GDP均对高技术产业竞争力有积极影响;投入研究的人员强度抑制了高技术产业的竞争力。但是,分区域研究结果显示,知识产权保护促进了东部地区、西部地区和东北地区的高技术产业竞争力,却阻碍了中部地区的高技术产业竞争力;政府支持力度、RD经费强度与人均GDP对四区域的高技术产业竞争力一致存在积极影响;RD人力强度对东部和中部地区的高技术产业竞争力作用为正,但对西部和东北地区的高技术产业竞争力作用为负。因此,总体来说加强我国知识产权保护强度有利于高技术产业竞争力的提升,但也存在一定的区域差异。 综上所述,在目前中国知识产权保护水平不高的情况下,应进一步加大知识产权保护力度,加强政府的支持力度和投入研究的经费强度,提高投入研究的人力强度转化率。具体可以从以下几个角度出发改善现有状况:(1)建立健全知识产权保护制度,着力提升执法力度;(2)结合中国国情制定与经济社会发展相匹配的知识产权保护制度;(3)各地区因地制宜,根据自身情况适当加强知识产权保护水平;(4)加大政府对高技术产业的资金支持;(5)推进产学研一体化,提升创新技术利用率。
[Abstract]:Under the background of economic globalization and the rapid development of science and technology, the world economy is changing from a traditional economic model characterized by raw materials, capital and energy consumption to a knowledge-based economy model guided by information and knowledge. Our country is in a critical period of social and economic transformation. The 12th Five-Year Plan clearly points out that we should adhere to scientific and technological progress and innovation as an important support for accelerating the transformation of the mode of economic development. The importance of intellectual property system as a policy to stimulate innovation and promote technological progress is becoming increasingly prominent. For a long time, the research on intellectual property and economy has focused on the developed countries; the research on the intensity of intellectual property protection in China started relatively late and focused on the theoretical aspects; in recent years, there have also been many empirical studies. However, it is the analysis of its FDI, international trade, economic growth and other aspects of the impact. Therefore, it is of great theoretical and practical significance to study the impact of intellectual property protection on the competitiveness of high technology industry. Firstly, this paper systematically combs the relevant literature based on the intellectual property protection, and then, based on the theory of industrial competitiveness and technology innovation and technology diffusion, the paper studies the impact of intellectual property protection on the competitiveness of high-tech industries. Then, the paper makes a preliminary statistical observation on the impact of intellectual property protection on the competitiveness of high-tech industries in China. On this basis, it conducts an empirical study to analyze the impact of intellectual property rights on high-tech industries in China and to compare the direction and degree of influence among different regions. Finally, based on the conclusion of the research and the characteristics of the current situation of intellectual property protection in China, this paper puts forward some relevant policy suggestions on improving the level of intellectual property protection, formulating appropriate intellectual property protection system and enhancing the competitiveness of high-tech industries. The overall regression results show that intellectual property protection has a significant role in promoting the competitiveness of high-tech industries, the government's support, research funding intensity, per capita GDP have a positive impact on the competitiveness of high-tech industries. The strength of the research staff inhibits the competitiveness of the high-tech industry. However, the results of sub-regional research show that intellectual property protection promotes the competitiveness of high-tech industries in the eastern, western and northeast regions, but hinders the competitiveness of high-tech industries in the central region. The intensity of R D funding and GDP per capita have positive effects on the competitiveness of high-tech industries in the eastern and central regions, and the positive effects of R D manpower strength on the competitiveness of high-tech industries in the eastern and central regions are positive. But to the west and the northeast area high-tech industry competitive effect is negative. Therefore, strengthening the intensity of intellectual property protection is conducive to the promotion of high-tech industry competitiveness, but there are some regional differences. To sum up, under the condition that the level of intellectual property protection in China is not high, we should further strengthen the protection of intellectual property rights, strengthen the support of the government and the funding intensity of investment research, and improve the conversion rate of manpower intensity of investment research. In particular, we can improve the existing situation from the following angles: 1) establish and improve the system of intellectual property protection. Work hard to enhance the enforcement of the law and formulate an intellectual property protection system in line with China's national conditions that matches economic and social development.) all regions should take measures according to local conditions. Strengthen the level of intellectual property protection according to its own situation (4) increase the government's financial support to high-tech industry (5) promote the integration of industry, education and research, improve the utilization rate of innovation technology.
【学位授予单位】:浙江理工大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2013
【分类号】:F204;F276.44;F121.3
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 胡昭玲;;国际垂直专业化对中国工业竞争力的影响分析[J];财经研究;2007年04期
2 柒江艺;许和连;;知识产权政策的进口贸易效应:扩张或垄断?——基于中国高技术产品进口贸易的实证研究[J];财经研究;2011年01期
3 王玉;许俊斌;南洋;;中国各地区制造业竞争力及其影响因素的实证研究[J];财经研究;2011年02期
4 严兵;;FDI与中国出口竞争力——基于地区差异视角的分析[J];财贸经济;2006年08期
5 陈立敏,谭力文;评价中国制造业国际竞争力的实证方法研究——兼与波特指标及产业分类法比较[J];中国工业经济;2004年05期
6 文东伟;冼国明;;垂直专业化与中国制造业贸易竞争力[J];中国工业经济;2009年06期
7 刘林青;李文秀;张亚婷;;比较优势、FDI和民族产业国际竞争力——“中国制造”国际竞争力的脆弱性分析[J];中国工业经济;2009年08期
8 董敏杰;梁泳梅;李钢;;环境规制对中国出口竞争力的影响——基于投入产出表的分析[J];中国工业经济;2011年03期
9 王建刚,于英川;我国高新技术产业竞争力比较研究[J];工业技术经济;2004年01期
10 陈丽静;顾国达;;技术创新、知识产权保护对中国进口商品结构的影响——基于1986-2007年时间序列数据的实证分析[J];国际贸易问题;2011年05期
相关博士学位论文 前2条
1 徐光瑞;我国高技术产业竞争力研究[D];吉林大学;2011年
2 孔伟杰;基于知识产权保护的国际技术溢出与经济增长[D];浙江工商大学;2010年
本文编号:1946156
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/zhishichanquanfa/1946156.html