论商标权用尽原则
发布时间:2018-05-29 12:56
本文选题:商标权用尽 + 反向假冒 ; 参考:《华南理工大学》2014年硕士论文
【摘要】:我国商标权立法在商标权用尽的规定方面仍处于空白状态。电子产品如手机翻新业务的产生,对我国商标权的法律保护领域提出了新的挑战。手机二手市场目前无论是法律制度还是责任主体上均缺失,不利于知识产权及环境资源的保护。 电子产品翻新行为能否援引商标权用尽原则,在理论和实务中都存在诸多争论。关于电子产品翻新业务方面的法律法规如何配套落实,目前尚无定论。引入商标权用尽原则有其合理性和必要性。本文共分四部分: 商标权用尽原则的范围。通过对商标权用尽原则的权利范围的探讨,阐述商标权用尽的相关理论,从而寻求商标权用尽的权利范围及合理性。其次,把商标权用尽原则的地域范围分为国内用尽、区域用尽、国际用尽进行讨论。 商标权用尽原则的限制。通过对美国商标权国内用尽、欧盟商标权区域用尽、日本商标权国际用尽的制度比较分析,并对相关案例精神进行总结,重点阐述了反向假冒、平行进口、损害商品声誉等三种限制情形及判断标准。 商标权用尽原则的实证分析。结合国内手机翻新的判决以及国外立法和判例,,通过实证分析方法总结电子产品翻新援引商标权用尽原则的条件及限制,说明来源于合法市场、属于维修而非再造范畴、不会让买受人对商品的来源或品质产生混淆的手机翻新行为应当可以援引商标权用尽原则,消费者在充分知情的前提下也应当有自行选择的权利。 商标权用尽原则制度建设的思考。首先对我国商标立法的现状进行描述,我国现行商标立法没有明确规定商标权用尽的相关内容。其次,明确商标权用尽的适用范围。最后结合我国国情提出应该将商标权立法与环境资源立法相协调,通过建立商标权用尽与生产者责任延伸制度,鼓励合法翻新行业有序发展。
[Abstract]:The legislation of trademark rights in our country is still blank in the aspect of the exhaustion of trademark rights. The emergence of electronic products, such as mobile phone refurbishment, poses a new challenge to the legal protection of trademark rights in China. At present, the second-hand market of mobile phone is deficient in both legal system and responsible subject, which is unfavorable to the protection of intellectual property and environmental resources. Whether the principle of exhaustion of trademark rights can be invoked in the renovation of electronic products is controversial in theory and practice. There is no final conclusion on how to implement the laws and regulations of electronic product refurbishment business. It is reasonable and necessary to introduce the principle of exhaustion of trademark rights. This paper is divided into four parts: The scope of the principle of exhaustion of trademark rights. Through the discussion of the scope of rights of the principle of exhaustion of trademark rights, this paper expounds the relevant theories of exhaustion of trademark rights, so as to seek the scope and rationality of the exhaustion of trademark rights. Secondly, the territorial scope of the principle of exhaustion of trademark rights is divided into domestic exhaustion, regional exhaustion and international exhaustion. Limitation of the principle of exhaustion of trademark rights. Through comparative analysis of the system of domestic exhaustion of trademark rights in the United States, regional exhaustion of trademark rights in the European Union, and international exhaustion of trademark rights in Japan, and a summary of the spirit of relevant cases, this paper focuses on reverse counterfeiting, parallel import. Damage to the reputation of goods and other three kinds of restrictions and judgment criteria. An empirical Analysis of the principle of exhaustion of Trademark Rights. Combined with the judgments of domestic mobile phone refurbishment and foreign legislation and jurisprudence, this paper summarizes the conditions and limitations of the principle of exhaustion of trademark rights in the renovation of electronic products by means of empirical analysis. It shows that it comes from the legal market and belongs to the category of maintenance rather than reengineering. The principle of exhaustion of trademark rights should be invoked in the mobile phone refurbishment that does not confuse the buyer with the source or quality of the goods, and consumers should have the right to choose on the premise of being fully informed. Reflections on the system Construction of the principle of exhaustion of Trademark Rights. Firstly, the current situation of trademark legislation in China is described. Secondly, the scope of application of the exhaustion of trademark rights should be clarified. Finally, according to the situation of our country, we should coordinate the legislation of trademark right with the legislation of environmental resources, and encourage the orderly development of legal renovation industry by establishing the system of exhaustion of trademark rights and extension of producer responsibility.
【学位授予单位】:华南理工大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2014
【分类号】:D923.43
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 贾娟;;侵权案件中如何适用“商标权穷竭原则”[J];中华商标;2008年09期
2 黄细江;;翻新手机的商标问题[J];中华商标;2012年01期
3 冯晓青;;知识产权的权利穷竭问题研究[J];北京科技大学学报(社会科学版);2007年03期
4 高华;;国际贸易中的商标产品平行进口问题法律研究[J];法学杂志;2007年01期
5 黄晖;内外有别——商标权利用尽的判例与立法[J];国际贸易;1999年04期
6 邹一凡;平行进口与知识产权权利穷竭问题思考[J];贵州大学学报(社会科学版);2004年01期
7 卢学丽;张今;;“改变商品外观”的商标侵权行为探析[J];中华商标;2013年04期
8 谢冠斌;陈增新;张昀;;中国知识产权争议解决年度观察(2013)[J];北京仲裁;2013年01期
9 王金勇;欧盟“商标权穷竭”法律问题研究[J];河北法学;2001年06期
10 张永艾;权利穷竭原则探究——兼论平行进口问题[J];河北法学;2004年03期
本文编号:1950954
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/zhishichanquanfa/1950954.html