评析假冒注册商标罪的几个疑难问题

发布时间：2018-06-01 11:31

本文选题：假冒注册商标罪 + 客观行为　；参考：《华东政法大学》2013年硕士论文

【摘要】：我国现行《刑法》第二百一十三条规定了“假冒注册商标罪”，对未经注册商标所有人许可，，在同一种商品上使用与其注册商标相同的商标，情节严重的行为进行了刑法规制。刑法法条规定的简洁性使得该法条无法适应商标法领域的专业性，从而不具有可操作性，无法在司法实践中得以适用，毕竟“同一种商品”、“相同的商标”等都需要相应的认定标准来予以认定。为了解决此种困境，相关的国家机关出台了一系列的司法解释对该刑法条文予以释义，有些司法解释为实践操作提供了切实有效的指导意见，但有些司法解释无疑是雪上添霜，反而使得人们对该法条的具体适用产生了更大的困惑。而且随着我国社会主义市场经济制度的确立和经济社会的快速发展，商标侵权行为的多样性和复杂性与日俱增，加之，与国际社会对商标权刑法保护范围扩大化的趋势相较而言，我国现行《刑法》对商标权的保护范围显得过于狭窄，故很有需要对假冒注册的服务商标的行为、反向假冒行为和商标淡化行为入罪的必要性进行探讨。本文共分了五个部分对上述问题进行探讨。第一部分是关于假冒注册商标罪的概况，从司法实践中假冒注册商标罪发生的频繁性和严重性论及了关注假冒注册商标罪的必要性，从假冒注册商标罪的立法现状引出了下文将要论述的话题。第二部分在梳理相关法律法规和司法解释规定的基础上，结合学者们的观点和笔者的认识，从“未经注册商标所有人许可”、“同一种商品”、“相同的商标”和“使用”这几个方面具体阐述对假冒注册商标罪客观行为的认定。第三部分着重对假冒注册商标罪情节认定中的数额和假冒商标数进行了阐述，笔者认为从权利人的角度出发对犯罪情节进行认定，不仅有利于保护注册商标专用权和国家的商标管理制度，还有利于司法实践中的操作。第四部分以假冒注册商标罪侵犯的客体为基准，就假冒注册商标罪与其他侵犯知识产权犯罪的关系，与生产、销售伪劣产品罪的关系以及与损害商业信誉、商品声誉罪的关系分情况进行了论述。第五部分在必要性原则的指导下，笔者对服务商标、反向假冒行为和商标淡化行为有无必要进行刑法规制进行阐述。
[Abstract]:Article 213 of the present Criminal Law of our country stipulates the crime of "counterfeiting registered trademark". The criminal law regulates the use of the same trademark on the same commodity without the permission of the owner of the registered trademark, the circumstances of which are serious. The brevity of the provisions of the criminal law makes it unable to adapt to the specialization in the field of trademark law, so it is not operable and can not be applied in judicial practice, after all, "the same commodity", "the same trademark" and so on all need the corresponding confirmation standard to be recognized. In order to solve this dilemma, the relevant state organs have issued a series of judicial interpretations to interpret the provisions of the Criminal Law. Some judicial interpretations have provided practical and effective guidance for the practical operation, but some judicial interpretations are undoubtedly adding to the snow. On the contrary, people have more confusion about the specific application of the law. Moreover, with the establishment of socialist market economy system and the rapid development of economic society, the diversity and complexity of trademark infringement are increasing day by day. Compared with the tendency of the international community to expand the scope of criminal law protection of trademark rights, the scope of protection of trademark rights in the current Criminal Law of our country is too narrow, so it is very necessary to deal with the acts of counterfeiting registered service trademarks. The necessity of decriminalization of reverse counterfeiting and trademark dilution is discussed. This paper is divided into five parts to discuss the above problems. The first part is about the general situation of the crime of counterfeiting registered trademark. It discusses the necessity of paying attention to the crime of counterfeiting registered trademark from the frequent and serious nature of the crime of counterfeiting registered trademark in judicial practice. From the legislation of the crime of counterfeiting registered trademark leads to the topic to be discussed below. The second part, on the basis of combing the relevant laws and regulations and judicial interpretation provisions, combining the views of scholars and the author's understanding, from "without the permission of the owner of registered trademark", "the same kind of goods", "the same trademark" and "use" are described in detail to identify the objective behavior of the crime of counterfeiting registered trademark. The third part focuses on the amount and the number of counterfeit trademarks in the determination of the circumstances of the crime of counterfeiting registered trademark. The author thinks that from the perspective of the obligee, the author determines the circumstances of the crime. It is not only conducive to the protection of the exclusive right of registered trademark and the national trademark management system, but also conducive to the operation in judicial practice. The fourth part, based on the object infringed by the crime of counterfeiting registered trademark, deals with the relationship between the crime of counterfeiting registered trademark and other crimes of infringing intellectual property rights, with the crime of producing and selling fake and inferior products, and with the damage to commercial reputation. The relation of commodity reputation crime is discussed. In the fifth part, under the guidance of the principle of necessity, the author expounds whether it is necessary to regulate service trademark, reverse counterfeiting and trademark dilution.
【学位授予单位】：华东政法大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2013
【分类号】：D924.33

【参考文献】