浅析专利国际纠纷的非诉解决方式

发布时间：2018-06-21 09:37

本文选题：专利 + 国际纠纷　；参考：《湘潭大学》2013年硕士论文

【摘要】：随着经济全球化进程的不断推进和知识经济的繁荣，跨国专利纠纷的数量急剧增加。构建一个经济、快捷的专利国际纠纷解决方式已日益成为最大程度释放国际专利的经济社会效益的重要途径，也是各国涉外知识产权保护的必要内容。在和平与发展的时代主题之下，构建一种重视交流合作，推崇尊重与宽容，倡导和谐理念的高效解纷方式是国际社会的共同呼声。然而，由于国际专利纠纷具有专业性强、标的额大、法律关系复杂、法律适用冲突和多重管辖的特点，有着诸多弊端的诉讼往往让专利国际纠纷的当事人赔了夫人又折兵，甚至谈诉色变。在上世纪60、70年代，西方发达国家就意识到了民事诉讼的程序正义与纠纷当事人所渴求的实质正义的差距，掀起了倡导非诉纠纷解决方式的“接近正义”的司法改革浪潮。然而，专利国际纠纷采用非诉解决方式的做法经过了很长一段时间才被国际社会有条件的认可。随着各国扩大公共利益的范围，非诉纠纷解决方式才逐渐适用于原本专为诉讼保留的专利领域。在专利国际纠纷的非诉解决实践中，一些重要国际组织对专利国际纠纷的非诉解决的规定及实践不仅为专利国际纠纷的可ADR性提供了实践依据，同时为专利国际纠纷的非诉解决积累了许多有益的经验。其中最有特色的是世界知识产权组织仲裁与调解中心和关贸总协定的调解小组对专利国际纠纷的非诉解决实践。笔者运用对比分析法，将专利国际纠纷的诉讼解决和专利国际纠纷的非诉解决的效果进行对比分析得出以下研究结果：专利国际纠纷的非诉解决方式比国际诉讼更为灵活，，能够保障当事人的意思自治；有利于纠纷的正确、即时、低廉和和平解决；有利于保持当事人之间友好的商贸关系；更能满足当事人对案件保密的要求；更有利于处理结果的实际执行。本文从法理学、管理学、心理学、伦理学和法律经济学的角度论证专利国际纠纷的非诉解决方式的必要性。同时，文章探讨了美国、英国、印度等主要国家有关专利国际纠纷非诉解决方式的立法和实践。最后，笔者分析了我国专利国际纠纷解决方式的现状，并对其进一步完善提供了一些思路。
[Abstract]:With the development of economic globalization and the prosperity of knowledge economy, the number of transnational patent disputes increases rapidly. The construction of an economic and fast way to resolve international patent disputes has become an important way to release the economic and social benefits of international patents to the greatest extent, and is also a necessary content for the protection of intellectual property rights involving foreign countries. Under the theme of peace and development, it is the common voice of the international community to construct an efficient way of resolving disputes by attaching importance to communication and cooperation, advocating respect and tolerance, and advocating the idea of harmony. However, due to the characteristics of international patent disputes with strong professionalism, large amount of subject matter, complicated legal relations, conflict of application of laws and multiple jurisdictions, litigation with many drawbacks often makes the parties to international patent disputes lose their wives and fold their troops. Even talk about color change. In the 1960s and 1970s, the western developed countries realized the gap between the procedural justice of civil litigation and the substantive justice that the litigants wanted, and set off a wave of judicial reform of "approaching justice" which advocated the non-litigation dispute resolution. However, it took a long time for international patent disputes to adopt non-litigation method. As countries expand the scope of public interest, non-litigation dispute resolution is gradually applied to the patent field reserved for litigation. In the practice of non-litigation settlement of international patent disputes, some important international organizations not only provide practical basis for ADR of international patent disputes, but also provide practical basis for non-litigation settlement of international patent disputes. At the same time, it has accumulated a lot of beneficial experience for the non-litigation settlement of patent international disputes. The world intellectual property organization arbitration and mediation center and the GATT mediation team of the international patent dispute settlement practice. By means of comparative analysis, the author makes a comparative analysis of the effects of litigation settlement of international patent disputes and non-litigation settlement of international patent disputes. The results are as follows: the non-litigation settlement of patent international disputes is more flexible than that of international litigation. It can guarantee the autonomy of the parties, be conducive to the correct, immediate, inexpensive and peaceful settlement of disputes, help to maintain friendly commercial relations between the parties, and better meet the requirements of the parties to the confidentiality of the case; It is more advantageous to handle the actual implementation of the results. This paper discusses the necessity of solving international patent disputes from the perspectives of jurisprudence, management, psychology, ethics and legal economics. At the same time, this paper discusses the legislation and practice of patent international dispute settlement in America, Britain, India and other major countries. Finally, the author analyzes the current situation of international patent dispute resolution in China, and provides some ideas for its further improvement.
【学位授予单位】：湘潭大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2013
【分类号】：D923.42

【参考文献】