技术措施保护的兼容性例外制度研究

发布时间:2018-07-02 20:37

  本文选题:兼容性 + 技术保护措施 ; 参考:《华南理工大学》2014年硕士论文


【摘要】:科学技术带领人类走进数字信息时代,在新的数字环境中,技术保护措施的运用使得版权人的合法权益得到了有效的维护,但是版权人以技术措施受法律保护为借口,利用技术措施形成限制竞争、捆绑销售等技术措施滥用的问题,成为法律保护领域的新难题。由于保护产品的知识产权与实现信息共享所必要的兼容性之间存在矛盾,如何平衡权利人与社会公众之间的利益值得关注。为了实现兼容性的目的,很多国家都在版权法的框架内建立了不同的应对方式。本文重点关注了几个典型国家的立法、司法实践,通过对它们的比较研究,结合我国立法缺失的现状,在兼容性的价值越发凸显的背景下,为完善我国技术措施保护的兼容性例外制度提供借鉴,以促进兼容性,从而推动技术创新,实现其价值的最大化。本文一共分为四部分。第一部分是关于技术保护措施的兼容性例外制度的概述。首先从技术层面、法律法规界定等角度,具体介绍了兼容性的定义及相关概念,然后论述了在数字时代中,兼容性价值的体现。第二部分具体论述了技术保护措施对兼容性限制的主要体现。分别从锁定消费者,破坏反向工程合法性,垄断配件产品的售后市场的角度进行了分析。第三部分比较研究了技术措施保护的兼容性例外制度的国际立法,包括美国《数字千年版权法》(DMCA)、《欧洲版权指令》(EUCD)、法国DADVSI法、加拿大《版权现代化法案》、澳大利亚《2006年版权修正法》。第四部分具有现实意义。首先回顾了我国技术措施法律保护制度的立法进程,,分析了我国现有立法的现状,表明了我国兼容性例外制度的立法缺失。最后一部分,笔者在结合我国当前的具体国情的基础上,汲取国外先进的立法经验,进一步提出了我国技术措施保护的兼容性例外制度具体设计方面的建设性意见。从确立基本原则入手,制定详细的兼容性规避例外需要满足的具体条件,在此基础上授权特定机构适用更新机制,定期对此制度进行审视与调整,同时设置监管机构,配合适当的救济手段,最终形成更加科学合理的制度设计。
[Abstract]:Science and technology lead mankind into the era of digital information. In the new digital environment, the use of technical protection measures makes the legitimate rights and interests of the copyright owners effectively maintained, but the copyright owners take the technical measures as an excuse for the use of technical measures to form restrictions on competition, binding sales and other technical measures abused. There is a new problem in the field of legal protection. Because there is a contradiction between the protection of the intellectual property rights of products and the compatibility of information sharing, it is worth paying attention to how to balance the interests between the right holder and the public. In order to achieve compatibility, many countries have set up different coping styles in the framework of copyright law. It pays more attention to the legislation and judicial practice of several typical countries, and through the comparative study of them, combined with the current situation of lack of legislation in our country and under the background of more and more compatible value, it provides a reference for improving the compatibility exception system of the protection of technical measures in our country, in order to promote compatibility, so as to promote technological innovation and realize its value most. This article is divided into four parts. The first part is an overview of the compatibility exception system of technical protection measures. First, it introduces the definition of compatibility and related concepts from the technical level and the definition of laws and regulations, and then discusses the embodiment of compatibility value in the digital age. The second part concretely discusses the technology. The protection measures are the main embodiment of the compatibility restrictions. From the angle of locking the consumers, destroying the legitimacy of the reverse engineering and monopolize the aftermarket of the accessories products, the third part compares the international legislation of the compatibility exception system for the protection of technical measures, including the Digital Millennium Copyright Law (DMCA) of the United States, and the European Copyright. Instruction > (EUCD), French DADVSI law, Canadian copyright Modernization Act, Australia's copyright amendment act in <2006 >. The fourth part is of practical significance. First, it reviews the legislative process of the legal protection system of our country's technical measures, analyzes the present situation of the existing legislation in our country, and shows the lack of legislation of our country's compatibility exception system. On the basis of the current specific national conditions of our country, the author draws on the advanced foreign legislative experience, and further puts forward constructive suggestions on the specific design of the compatibility exception system for the protection of technical measures in China. At the same time, the special institutions are authorized to apply the renewal mechanism to examine and adjust the system regularly. At the same time, the supervision institutions are set up, and the appropriate relief means are set up to form a more scientific and reasonable system design.
【学位授予单位】:华南理工大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2014
【分类号】:D923.41

【参考文献】

相关期刊论文 前10条

1 陇小渝;张芳;;兼容性对电信竞争的影响及对管制政策的启示[J];当代财经;2008年02期

2 唐百川;胡汉辉;;软件企业的产品兼容性决策选择[J];东南大学学报(哲学社会科学版);2005年S1期

3 陈飞;美国合理使用制度在反向工程中的运用——以Sony诉Connectix案为线索[J];电子知识产权;2003年06期

4 张晋静;软件反向工程合法性的经济学分析[J];电子知识产权;2003年07期

5 王迁;滥用"技术措施"的法律对策——评美国Skylink案及Static案[J];电子知识产权;2005年01期

6 任军民;;法国数字信息网络最新立法述评[J];法商研究;2006年06期

7 冯晓青;;技术措施与著作权保护探讨[J];法学杂志;2007年04期

8 李贝贝,黄锋;信息技术的兼容性分析——以软件业为例[J];中国工业经济;2003年07期

9 朱振中,吕廷杰;兼容性经济学研究的发展[J];中国工业经济;2004年09期

10 刘娜;周平;张顺利;;云计算互操作性分类研究[J];信息技术与标准化;2012年Z1期

相关博士学位论文 前1条

1 王东君;数字版权管理的法律限制问题研究[D];武汉大学;2011年



本文编号:2090844

资料下载
论文发表

本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/zhishichanquanfa/2090844.html


Copyright(c)文论论文网All Rights Reserved | 网站地图 |

版权申明:资料由用户d82db***提供,本站仅收录摘要或目录,作者需要删除请E-mail邮箱bigeng88@qq.com