论室外公共场所雕塑作品的合理使用
发布时间：2018-07-22 15:15
【摘要】：合理使用作为一种著作权限制制度已经是现代各国著作权法的通行制度，其中允许对室外公共场所艺术作品进行合理使用也得到各国普遍认可。我国《著作权法》第22条第（10）项亦有此规定，但由于立法规范的模糊性和判断标准的缺失，使得我国司法实践中法官对此类纠纷的处理参差不齐，学理上也一直争论不休。因此，有必要对室外公共场所雕塑作品的合理使用问题做出理论上的深化研究，从而推进立法上的完善，最终指导司法解决利益纷争。 本文总体的行文思路为：首先，以实践中的典型司法案例为研究出发点，归纳分析案例所反映的问题，并从中引出理论探讨。然后，在借鉴域外优秀立法和学术研究的基础上，，立足于我国司法实践之需要，从而最终对该理论作出推进和完善。主要内容可分为四部分： 第一部分是司法层面的剖析，通过对“东方醒狮”、“五月的风”、“董永和七仙女”案等五个经典司法案例的判决依据和判决伦理进行解析，总结出室外公共场所雕塑作品的合理使用纠纷存在的共同争议焦点：一是立体到平面的摄影行为是否属于复制；二是营利目的的再行使用是否构成合理使用。不同的法院基于对争议焦点的不同理解，从而以不同的判决伦理生成不同甚至完全相反的判决结果。 第二部分是学理层面的探讨，首先介绍室外公共场所雕塑作品的特殊性以及合理使用制度的法律属性和一般判断标准。然后，重点阐述我国知识产权学界在室外公共场所雕塑作品的异形复制和营利目的的再行使用问题上存在的观点分歧。最后，笔者在考查了世界各国著作权法相关立法规定和我国司法实践之需要的基础上得出本文结论：利用摄影实现室外公共场所雕塑作品从立体到平面的简单再现的行为属于著作权法意义上的复制行为；但对合理使用下获得的复制件进行再行使用时应当“以正当目的为前提，非营利性使用为原则，附带使用为例外”，否则不属于我国著作权法规定的合理使用范围。 第三部分采用比较法的研究方法，在考查美国、德国、英国、日本以及我国台湾地区等国家或地区的著作权法对室外公共场所雕塑作品合理使用的相关规定后，从合理使用方式和再行使用范围两个层面进行比较分析。借此，以期对完善我国室外公共场所雕塑作品的立法规范提供一定的借鉴意义和参考价值。 第四部分是对我国室外公共场所雕塑作品合理使用制度的反思与重构。分析相关案例的判决书后发现，我国大部分法院在处理室外公共场所雕塑作品合理使用纠纷案件时存在“判决结果不一，说理不充分”的弊端。这其中的主要原因在于我国立法规范仍缺乏可供法官参考的合理使用判断标准。因此，本文认为，基于对现代著作权法的立法宗旨和合理使用制度的价值功能之考虑，有必要确定“利益平衡”作为我国合理使用的一般判断原则，同时在充分考虑室外公共场所雕塑作品的特性基础上确立一些具体的判断要素。
[Abstract]:The rational use of the copyright restriction system has been the system of the copyright law of modern countries, which allows the rational use of art works in outdoor public places to be widely recognized by all countries. China's copyright law, twenty-second articles (10), also has this provision, but is due to the lack of ambiguity and judgment standards of the legislative norms, Therefore, it is necessary to deepen the theoretical research on the rational use of the sculpture works in outdoor public places, so as to promote the perfection of the legislation and ultimately guide the judicial solution of the dispute of interest.
The overall thinking of the article is as follows: first, taking the typical judicial cases in practice as the starting point, the problems reflected in the case are summarized and the theoretical discussion is drawn from it. Then, on the basis of the excellent legislation and academic research abroad, it is based on the needs of the judicial practice in our country, and finally the theory is promoted and finished. Good. The main content can be divided into four parts:
The first part is the analysis of the judicial level. Through the analysis of the judgment basis and the judgment ethics of the five classical judicial cases, such as "the east lion", "the wind of May", "Dong Yong and the seven fairy" case, this paper sums up the common dispute focus in the dispute of the rational use of the sculpture works in outdoor public places: one is the stereo to the plane. Whether or not the action of the shadow belongs to reproduction; two is whether the re use of profit purposes constitutes a reasonable use. Different courts based on different understanding of the focus of the dispute, thus generating different or even completely opposite verdict results with different judgment ethics.
The second part is the discussion of the theoretical level. First, it introduces the particularity of the sculpture works in outdoor public places, the legal attributes of the rational use system and the general judgment standard. Then, it focuses on the views of the intellectual property circles in the field of intellectual property of our country on the reduplication of the sculptures in outdoor public places and the reuse of the purpose of the profit. Finally, on the basis of examining the relevant legislative provisions of the copyright law of the world and the needs of the judicial practice of our country, the author draws the conclusion that the simple reproduction of the sculptures of outdoor public places from the stereoscopic to the plane by photography is a copy of the copyright law. It should be "on the premise of proper purpose, the principle of non profit use as the principle, and the incidental use as an exception", otherwise it does not belong to the reasonable scope of use stipulated by the copyright law of China.
The third part adopts the comparative method, and compares the relevant provisions of the copyright law of the United States, Germany, Britain, Japan and the Taiwan region of China to the rational use of sculpture works in outdoor public places, and compares them with the two levels of rational use and re use. The statues of sculptures in outdoor public places in China provide some reference and reference value.
The fourth part is the reflection and reconstruction of the rational use system of sculpture works in outdoor public places in China. After the analysis of relevant cases, it is found that most of the courts of our country have the malpractice of "the result is not one and the reason is inadequate" when dealing with the rational use of disputes in the sculpture works of outdoor public places. The main reasons are the main reasons. Therefore, it is necessary to determine the "balance of interests" as a general judgment principle for rational use of our country, and to take full consideration of the outdoor public. Based on the characteristics of sculpture works, some specific elements of judgement are established.
【学位授予单位】：西南政法大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2013
【分类号】：D923.41
本文编号：2137876
[Abstract]:The rational use of the copyright restriction system has been the system of the copyright law of modern countries, which allows the rational use of art works in outdoor public places to be widely recognized by all countries. China's copyright law, twenty-second articles (10), also has this provision, but is due to the lack of ambiguity and judgment standards of the legislative norms, Therefore, it is necessary to deepen the theoretical research on the rational use of the sculpture works in outdoor public places, so as to promote the perfection of the legislation and ultimately guide the judicial solution of the dispute of interest.
The overall thinking of the article is as follows: first, taking the typical judicial cases in practice as the starting point, the problems reflected in the case are summarized and the theoretical discussion is drawn from it. Then, on the basis of the excellent legislation and academic research abroad, it is based on the needs of the judicial practice in our country, and finally the theory is promoted and finished. Good. The main content can be divided into four parts:
The first part is the analysis of the judicial level. Through the analysis of the judgment basis and the judgment ethics of the five classical judicial cases, such as "the east lion", "the wind of May", "Dong Yong and the seven fairy" case, this paper sums up the common dispute focus in the dispute of the rational use of the sculpture works in outdoor public places: one is the stereo to the plane. Whether or not the action of the shadow belongs to reproduction; two is whether the re use of profit purposes constitutes a reasonable use. Different courts based on different understanding of the focus of the dispute, thus generating different or even completely opposite verdict results with different judgment ethics.
The second part is the discussion of the theoretical level. First, it introduces the particularity of the sculpture works in outdoor public places, the legal attributes of the rational use system and the general judgment standard. Then, it focuses on the views of the intellectual property circles in the field of intellectual property of our country on the reduplication of the sculptures in outdoor public places and the reuse of the purpose of the profit. Finally, on the basis of examining the relevant legislative provisions of the copyright law of the world and the needs of the judicial practice of our country, the author draws the conclusion that the simple reproduction of the sculptures of outdoor public places from the stereoscopic to the plane by photography is a copy of the copyright law. It should be "on the premise of proper purpose, the principle of non profit use as the principle, and the incidental use as an exception", otherwise it does not belong to the reasonable scope of use stipulated by the copyright law of China.
The third part adopts the comparative method, and compares the relevant provisions of the copyright law of the United States, Germany, Britain, Japan and the Taiwan region of China to the rational use of sculpture works in outdoor public places, and compares them with the two levels of rational use and re use. The statues of sculptures in outdoor public places in China provide some reference and reference value.
The fourth part is the reflection and reconstruction of the rational use system of sculpture works in outdoor public places in China. After the analysis of relevant cases, it is found that most of the courts of our country have the malpractice of "the result is not one and the reason is inadequate" when dealing with the rational use of disputes in the sculpture works of outdoor public places. The main reasons are the main reasons. Therefore, it is necessary to determine the "balance of interests" as a general judgment principle for rational use of our country, and to take full consideration of the outdoor public. Based on the characteristics of sculpture works, some specific elements of judgement are established.
【学位授予单位】：西南政法大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2013
【分类号】：D923.41
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 郑瑞琨;著作权合理使用法律性质分析[J];北京科技大学学报(社会科学版);2000年04期
2 朱理;附带使用——著作权合理使用的一种特殊形式[J];电子知识产权;2005年04期
3 董炳和;合理使用:著作权的例外还是使用者的权利[J];法商研究(中南政法学院学报);1998年03期
4 王清;;室外艺术作品合理使用的司法解释与司法判决之反思[J];法学评论;2008年05期
5 夏美婷;;论室外艺术作品合理使用——由“黄河母亲”纠纷案引发的思考[J];法制与社会;2011年09期
6 曹燕飞;;室外艺术作品合理使用制度的反思[J];西部法学评论;2008年04期
7 张秀玲;对“东方醒狮”著作权纠纷案的法律思考——谈本案作品著作权的归属以及著作权的例外[J];兰州铁道学院学报;2002年05期
8 于晓白;;陈列在室外公共场所的艺术作品的合理使用[J];人民司法;2005年05期
9 吴汉东;美国著作权法中合理使用的“合理性”判断标准[J];外国法译评;1997年03期
10 卢海君;;合理使用一般条款的猜想与证明——合理使用制度立法模式探讨[J];政法论丛;2007年02期
本文编号：2137876
本文链接：https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/zhishichanquanfa/2137876.html
