计算机软件盗版的认定及法律规制
[Abstract]:Science and technology is the first productive force, which is a consensus reached by governments in today's economic integration. Under the impetus of science and technology, the application of computer has been popularized more widely, and has driven the related software industry. The software development of our country began at the end of 1970s. Due to the late start, this new industry has been squeezed by foreign countries from the initial stage, the domestic research fund is insufficient, the talent shortage and so on factors restrict, and so on. With the development of computer industry, the expansion of software market demand, and the low cost of software replication, easy to grasp the characteristics of technology, software piracy has become increasingly prominent, becoming a more and more people's means of profit. In general, the types of software piracy can be divided into: hard disk preinstalled piracy, software counterfeiting piracy, CD piracy, corporate piracy, Internet piracy, different individuals mixed piracy and so on. In order to solve the increasingly serious piracy situation, the copyright Law of the people's Republic of China, which is an important part of intellectual property rights, has been amended to establish a copyright protection system that conforms to the international standards of copyright protection. In addition to copyright law, there are professional departments of laws and regulations, that is, computer software protection regulations. Nevertheless, our country's piracy rate is still among the highest in all countries. The US Business Software Alliance (BAS) published the worldwide piracy rate for major countries in 2010: China's 2009 piracy rate was 79, ranking 27th. Although down from 97 percent in 1994, there is still a big gap with the United States, which has the lowest piracy rate (20 percent) (see note 1 on page 1 for the relevant data for this paragraph). Under the strong pressure of the United States, we must stiffly raise the scale of piracy to the same level as developed countries. Copyright should be protected, but according to the traditional doctrine of moderation, there should be a reasonable excess between protection and strike. The formulation of the law should not only be fair and equitable, but also take into account efficiency and effectiveness. Therefore, based on the present situation of economic and social development in our country, the paper will explore and study the standards of copyright software, the judgment of infringement, the operation of legislation and the practice of judicature from the aspects of social interests and personal interests. The standard of software piracy is not only common but also different with general software infringement. Theoretically speaking, the infringement of pirated software must meet four conditions: the existence of infringement of the fact of damage; the implementation of tort; tort and damage between the causal relationship between the result of the infringement; the infringer has subjective fault. In practice, to determine whether software piracy constitutes, there are the following methods: 1, you can compare or contrast the file name in the disk with the original version of the software, the directory is 2, compare the installation process 3, compare the directory, file, and use process after installation; 4, contrast the way of code. In addition, on the basis of the comparison of domestic and foreign research status, the article puts forward the legal countermeasures to perfect the software protection in our country, hoping to provide more comprehensive protection to the software development of our country. For example, in the civil law, we should pay attention to the balance of the "ladder" of protection, clarify the provisions of reverse engineering; refine the standard of criminal conviction of piracy in criminal law, increase the intensity of punishment; and promote the government to foster the software innovation industry in administration.
【学位授予单位】:华南理工大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2013
【分类号】:D923.4
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 邱均平,陈敬全;中、美计算机软件知识产权保护的比较分析[J];图书与情报;2001年02期
2 汤黎明,陈惠珍,徐俊;浅议知识产权侵权诉讼举证责任分配规则[J];电子知识产权;2003年12期
3 秦娈娈;孙大伟;;浅论计算机软件的法律保护[J];福建电脑;2010年08期
4 李晓;;中美知识产权刑事保护比较研究[J];法律适用;2006年05期
5 周根才;高毅龙;;知识产权侵权救济中损害赔偿数额的确定[J];法律适用;2008年12期
6 曾隽;;对计算机软件属性和保护方式的认识[J];才智;2012年31期
7 罗晓丹;;论计算机软件知识产权保护模式的优化[J];计算机光盘软件与应用;2012年23期
8 朱妙春;;瓮鳖逃亡——H公司侵犯计算机软件著作权调解纪实[J];中国发明与专利;2013年01期
9 杨永;何辉利;李颖;;计算机软件法律保护[J];河北理工大学学报(社会科学版);2008年01期
10 张春艳;;论著作权侵权损害赔偿额确定中举证责任的分配[J];河南师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版);2011年06期
相关重要报纸文章 前5条
1 本报记者 张伟勋;[N];中国贸易报;2009年
2 本报记者 陶海青;[N];中国贸易报;2013年
3 本报记者 刘彬;[N];光明日报;2013年
4 本报记者 汤浔芳;[N];21世纪经济报道;2013年
5 实习记者 肖琼;[N];消费日报;2012年
相关硕士学位论文 前4条
1 胡静;中国计算机游戏软件盗版问题研究[D];中南民族大学;2011年
2 秦瑜;我国当前软件盗版问题研究[D];西南财经大学;2011年
3 柯鑫鑫;计算机软件的著作权保护模式探讨[D];四川大学;2005年
4 郭廓;软件盗版实证分析与反盗版政策研究[D];吉林大学;2007年
本文编号:2138753
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/zhishichanquanfa/2138753.html