论中国驰名商标司法认定制度
发布时间：2018-07-24 07:46
【摘要】：随着我国经济社会迅猛发展，国际竞争力不断加强，我国综合国力上升，驰名商标的关注度越来越高，今天我们要从中国制造向中国创造转变，在知识产权领域就要求我们有自己独特的民族特色，有自己的民族企业，有自己的驰名商标，驰名商标的认定是其保护的前提，所以探索中国驰名商标的司法认定制度是很有必要的，这也是国际大潮流所趋。 本文共分五章进行论述分析。 第一章简单地介绍了研究此问题的背景、意义，介绍了目前国内外对于此问题的研究情况，本文所运用的研究方法以及写作思路等。 第二章驰名商标概述，，从与驰名商标相似的几个概念入手，分析驰名商标的法律含义，然后分析驰名商标的法律特征，让读者更加深刻的了解驰名商标。 第三章阐述了我国驰名商标司法认定制度的现状，分析了驰名商标司法认定的原则，主要从个案认定、被动认定和按需认定三个原则谈起。原则之后又对驰名商标司法认定的依据作了分析，分别从国际、国内两方面进行了分析。 第四章则向读者阐述了我国驰名商标司法认定制度存在的问题，对问题进行了研究分析，这是本篇论文的第一个重点核心内容。该部分从驰名商标司法认定的标准混乱、制度确立不完善、司法认定与行政认定冲突、存在“虚假诉讼”方面分别作了详细的分析阐述，穿插了案例作了详细贴切的论证。这一部分为本篇论文的第二个重点核心内容即第五章作了铺垫。 第五章承接第四章，针对性地提出了当下我国驰名商标司法认定制度问题的解决策略，针对如何统一完善认定标准、协调司法认定与行政认定的关系、防范与规制虚假诉讼提出了相对完善的解决方法。
[Abstract]:With the rapid development of China's economy and society, the continuous strengthening of international competitiveness, the rise of China's comprehensive national strength, and the increasing attention paid to well-known trademarks, today we are going to transform from made in China to created in China. In the field of intellectual property rights, we are required to have our own unique national characteristics, have our own national enterprises, have our own well-known trademarks, and the recognition of well-known trademarks is the prerequisite for its protection. Therefore, it is necessary to explore the judicial recognition system of well-known trademarks in China, which is also the trend of international trend. This article is divided into five chapters to discuss and analyze. The first chapter briefly introduces the background and significance of the research, introduces the current domestic and foreign research on this issue, the research methods used in this paper and the writing ideas, etc. The second chapter is the outline of well-known trademark, starting with several concepts similar to well-known trademark, analyzing the legal meaning of well-known trademark, and then analyzing the legal characteristics of well-known trademark, so that readers can understand the well-known trademark more deeply. The third chapter expounds the current situation of the judicial recognition system of well-known trademarks in China, and analyzes the principles of judicial recognition of well-known trademarks, mainly from the three principles of case determination, passive recognition and on-demand recognition. After the principle, the basis of judicial recognition of well-known trademark is analyzed, from the international and domestic aspects. The fourth chapter expounds the problems existing in the judicial recognition system of well-known trademarks in China, and analyzes the problems, which is the first key content of this paper. In this part, the standard of well-known trademark judicial identification is confused, the system is not perfect, the conflict between judicial confirmation and administrative confirmation, the existence of "false litigation" is analyzed in detail, and the case is discussed in detail. This part paves the way for the second key content of this paper, the fifth chapter. The fifth chapter carries on the fourth chapter, puts forward the solution strategy of the judicial cognizance system of well-known trademark in our country, aiming at how to unify and perfect the cognizance standard, coordinate the relationship between the judicial cognizance and the administrative cognizance. Prevention and regulation of false litigation put forward a relatively perfect solution.
【学位授予单位】：山西财经大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2015
【分类号】：D923.43
[Abstract]:With the rapid development of China's economy and society, the continuous strengthening of international competitiveness, the rise of China's comprehensive national strength, and the increasing attention paid to well-known trademarks, today we are going to transform from made in China to created in China. In the field of intellectual property rights, we are required to have our own unique national characteristics, have our own national enterprises, have our own well-known trademarks, and the recognition of well-known trademarks is the prerequisite for its protection. Therefore, it is necessary to explore the judicial recognition system of well-known trademarks in China, which is also the trend of international trend. This article is divided into five chapters to discuss and analyze. The first chapter briefly introduces the background and significance of the research, introduces the current domestic and foreign research on this issue, the research methods used in this paper and the writing ideas, etc. The second chapter is the outline of well-known trademark, starting with several concepts similar to well-known trademark, analyzing the legal meaning of well-known trademark, and then analyzing the legal characteristics of well-known trademark, so that readers can understand the well-known trademark more deeply. The third chapter expounds the current situation of the judicial recognition system of well-known trademarks in China, and analyzes the principles of judicial recognition of well-known trademarks, mainly from the three principles of case determination, passive recognition and on-demand recognition. After the principle, the basis of judicial recognition of well-known trademark is analyzed, from the international and domestic aspects. The fourth chapter expounds the problems existing in the judicial recognition system of well-known trademarks in China, and analyzes the problems, which is the first key content of this paper. In this part, the standard of well-known trademark judicial identification is confused, the system is not perfect, the conflict between judicial confirmation and administrative confirmation, the existence of "false litigation" is analyzed in detail, and the case is discussed in detail. This part paves the way for the second key content of this paper, the fifth chapter. The fifth chapter carries on the fourth chapter, puts forward the solution strategy of the judicial cognizance system of well-known trademark in our country, aiming at how to unify and perfect the cognizance standard, coordinate the relationship between the judicial cognizance and the administrative cognizance. Prevention and regulation of false litigation put forward a relatively perfect solution.
【学位授予单位】：山西财经大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2015
【分类号】：D923.43
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 何鹏;;驰名商标“异化”之治理[J];中华商标;2008年12期
2 冯晓青;邓晶晶;;我国注册驰名商标状况实证研究与理论思考——基于1983～2011年注册于中国的驰名商标的文献与信息分析[J];武陵学刊;2012年02期
3 周俊强;;我国驰名商标司法认定的原则、条件与基准[J];法学杂志;2010年05期
4 储敏;;地方政府实施商标战略的省思[J];法学杂志;2012年02期
5 苏U
本文编号：2140698
本文链接：https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/zhishichanquanfa/2140698.html
