中国医药产业国际竞争力研究
[Abstract]:The pharmaceutical industry is the pillar industry of our national economy and an important industry related to the national economy and the people's livelihood. Firstly, the paper analyzes the development of the pharmaceutical industry in China, which has a rapid development rate, but is still a pharmaceutical country, far from a pharmaceutical power. There are many restrictive factors in development, such as low industrial concentration, weak independent innovation ability, low technical level and poor economic benefits. However, with the development of economy, the improvement of urbanization, the arrival of aging society and the inclination of national policy, the development of pharmaceutical industry is also promoted. Secondly, the paper analyzes the import and export situation of Chinese drugs. Both in import and export, China occupies an important position in the world market, but there is still a gap compared with developed countries. Then this paper constructs a comprehensive index system to evaluate the international competitiveness of Chinese pharmaceutical industry, and analyzes it from three aspects: external performance, internal ability and development environment. The external performance of the international competitiveness of Chinese pharmaceutical industry is reflected in three aspects: the ability to transform resources, the ability to market and the capability of technology. In this paper, the utilization of labor productivity, the profit and tax rate of output value, the international market share, TC index and RCA index are discussed. Net export contribution rate, new product sales rate and other indicators to analyze the development of Chinese pharmaceutical industry, and compared with the United States, Germany, Japan, India. The inherent ability of the international competitiveness of China's pharmaceutical industry is embodied in four aspects: industrial running state, technical input, comparative advantage and innovation vigor. In this paper, the ratio of R D personnel input and R D personnel investment ratio is used to make use of the ratio of assets and liabilities to R D personnel investment. To compare the international competitiveness of the pharmaceutical industry between China and the United States, the investment in technological transformation, the input in technology introduction, the input in technology digestion, the cost of labor, the scale of industry and the scale of market are used to compare the international competitiveness of pharmaceutical industry between China and the United States. The development environment of Chinese pharmaceutical industry's international competitiveness is analyzed from four aspects: politics, economy, trade and technology. On the basis of qualitative analysis, this paper selects labor productivity and international market share according to scientific principle, operational principle, RCA index and R D investment ratio in the evaluation index system of international competitiveness of pharmaceutical industry. Based on the quantitative analysis of industrial scale and foreign trade dependence, the principal component scores of China, the United States, Germany, Japan and India are obtained by principal component analysis. Based on this, the international competitiveness of Chinese pharmaceutical industry and the gap between China and other countries are evaluated, and a quantitative analysis index system for evaluating the international competitiveness of Chinese pharmaceutical industry is constructed. Finally, the paper puts forward some countermeasures and suggestions on the problems of Chinese pharmaceutical industry and the gap of international competitiveness between China and other countries through principal component analysis, including adjusting and optimizing the organizational structure and increasing the market concentration. Increase technical input, strengthen the independent innovation ability of enterprises; strengthen the protection of pharmaceutical intellectual property rights; speed up the upgrading of industrial structure, and strengthen the key sub-industries differently; strengthen the government guidance and support, and so on.
【学位授予单位】:安徽大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2014
【分类号】:F426.72
【相似文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 周彩阳;;医药湘军破局:产业集群化思路渐显[J];企业家天地;2007年12期
2 ;成功的盛会 鼓劲的号角——博鳌论坛全球医药产业大会取得圆满成功[J];泰州科技;2006年05期
3 袁松范;;中国医药产业突破点的探讨[J];中国医药工业杂志;2006年06期
4 刘 皓,钟素艳,徐长影,晋治图;中国医药产业怎样实施跨国经营[J];中国药业;2002年05期
5 潘帕思;中国医药产业将掀重组浪潮[J];国际医药卫生导报;2002年18期
6 程意平;未来5年中国医药产业发展趋势及对策[J];医药世界;2005年04期
7 ;医药工业总产值2009年有望突破万亿元[J];机电信息;2009年29期
8 黄静;;投资环境与2008年医药产业的发展[J];中国医药技术经济与管理;2008年Z1期
9 刘晓明;李善举;;一场行业巨人的成长竞赛——转型与聚变中的中国医药产业[J];中国食品药品监管;2011年02期
10 刘丽;浅谈中国医药产业的发展方向[J];芜湖职业技术学院学报;2003年01期
相关会议论文 前4条
1 杨建平;杨满山;冉建新;;也论中药现代化[A];中医药现代化研究学术大会论文集[C];2001年
2 桑国卫;;金融危机下的中国医药产业与药物创新[A];2009年中国药学大会暨第九届中国药师周报告集[C];2009年
3 夏辉;郭永磊;;论企业研发中心是企业持续发展的动力源泉[A];河南企业研发中心建设研究[C];2011年
4 罗兴洪;杨孝华;;医药企业面临的挑战与对策[A];2010年中国药学大会暨第十届中国药师周论文集[C];2010年
相关重要报纸文章 前10条
1 诸巍;中国医药产业靠什么融入世界[N];解放日报;2005年
2 王庭君;市领导会见美国客人[N];泰州日报;2007年
3 综合;首届中国医药产业融投资高端论坛将在沪举行[N];医药经济报;2008年
4 成吉昌;博鳌论坛国际医药产业大会在泰州召开[N];经理日报;2006年
5 记者 钟可芬;黄金十年:有了方向就不怕路远[N];医药经济报;2010年
6 逄增志;以降价引领行业 健康发展是伪命题[N];21世纪药店;2011年
7 本报通讯员 陈天晓 吴保平 本报记者 范又;关键是体制创新和机制创新[N];光明日报;2003年
8 姜圣瑜 顾介铸 董晨;医药产业突破口在于中药现代化[N];中国中医药报;2006年
9 本报记者 郭望;紧跟疾病谱[N];医药经济报;2006年
10 中国医药企业管理协会执行会长 于明德;走出国门天地宽[N];中国医药报;2004年
相关硕士学位论文 前10条
1 张海燕;中国医药产业国际竞争力研究[D];安徽大学;2014年
2 冯艳;中国医药产业R&D问题研究[D];沈阳药科大学;2001年
3 沈之江;专利保护与中国医药产业发展对策[D];华中科技大学;2005年
4 艾广乾;中国医药产业集中度实证研究[D];青岛大学;2010年
5 王丽君;动力机制研究[D];南京中医药大学;2009年
6 张玉倩;知识产权保护对中国医药产业国际竞争力的影响研究[D];浙江工业大学;2008年
7 王晖;吉林省玉顺堂药业有限公司经营状况与策略研究[D];吉林大学;2006年
8 王桂来;青岛HH制药公司的发展战略研究[D];复旦大学;2009年
9 赵江平;中药企业发展战略研究[D];中国海洋大学;2010年
10 宋潞潞;上海医药采购管理研究与实践[D];复旦大学;2008年
,本文编号:2147617
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/zhishichanquanfa/2147617.html