商标权与在先著作权冲突的解决机制研究

发布时间：2018-08-06 15:50

【摘要】：随着社会经济的高速发展,知识产权案件纠纷日益复杂化,商标权与在先著作权的冲突亦是日趋频繁。为协调商标权与在先著作权的冲突,我国立法进行了一定的规制,但由于过于粗略,可操作性较差,现有的解决机制仍有不畅通之处,有待理论上进一步商榷探讨。简单地说,对于未注册的商标,我国法律虽规定了商标局可以启动事前审查程序,在先著作权人也可以在公告期内提出异议,但由于我国目前尚未建立统一的知识产权行政管理机构,且未实现整个知识产权领域内的联网查询配套制度,在协调二者冲突这一问题上,就事前救济而言成效有限;对于已经注册的商标,在先著作权人欲寻求权利救济,依据我国商标法的规定须经历商标评审这一前置程序,若其对作出的裁定不服,仍可以向人民法院起诉。由此,不难分析出对于商标争议纠纷的审查,我国存在着商标局与法院分别审核认定的双轨制救济模式。然而,这种双轨制救济模式存有的弊端是显而易见的。现有的双轨解决机制不仅容易出现矛盾裁判,致使知识产权执法混乱,而且还容易造成大量的行政司法资源浪费。鉴于此,笔者认为我们有必要重新审视这一问题,从而高效、便捷、多元化的完善我国关于二者冲突的解决机制。本文拟在前人研究的基础之上,从二者冲突的概念界定、表现类型入手,结合我国现有的法律规制及其存在的问题,分析二者产生冲突的原因,并运用比较法分析国外相关的先进立法模式,以期对二者冲突提出更为合理的、多元化的解决机制,最终相对合理地分配权利义务,实现权利人之间利益上的平衡。
[Abstract]:With the rapid development of social economy, intellectual property disputes are becoming more and more complicated, and the conflicts between trademark rights and prior copyright are becoming more and more frequent. In order to coordinate the conflict between trademark right and prior copyright, the legislation of our country has carried out certain regulation, but because of too rough, the operability is poor, the existing solution mechanism still has the unimpeded place, which needs to be further discussed in theory. To put it simply, although the law of our country stipulates that the Trademark Office may initiate a prior examination procedure for unregistered trademarks, the prior copyright owner may also raise objections within the period of the announcement. However, since China has not yet established a unified intellectual property administrative organization, and has not realized the whole intellectual property field of the network query matching system, in the coordination of the conflict between the two, the effectiveness of prior relief is limited; For the trademark that has been registered, the prior copyright owner wants to seek the right relief, according to the trademark law of our country, must go through the trademark appraisal this front procedure, if he is not satisfied with the ruling made, can still sue in the people's court. Therefore, it is not difficult to analyze the examination of trademark disputes. However, the drawbacks of this dual-track relief model are obvious. The existing dual-track resolution mechanism is not only prone to conflict adjudication, resulting in confusion of intellectual property law enforcement, but also easy to cause a large number of administrative and judicial resources waste. In view of this, the author thinks that it is necessary for us to re-examine this problem, so as to improve the mechanism of resolving the conflict between the two in our country efficiently, conveniently and plurally. On the basis of previous studies, this paper analyzes the causes of the conflict, starting from the definition of the concept of conflict between the two, the types of expression, combined with the existing legal regulations and existing problems in our country. The comparative method is used to analyze the relevant advanced legislative models in foreign countries in order to put forward a more reasonable and pluralistic mechanism to solve the conflict between the two, and finally to distribute the rights and obligations reasonably and realize the balance between the interests of the right holders.
【学位授予单位】：江苏大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2017
【分类号】：D923.43

【相似文献】