论商业秘密案件中临时禁止令申请人的举证责任
发布时间：2018-09-03 08:13
【摘要】：加入Trips协议以来,我国在知识产权法中增加了"临时禁令"的规定。但在审理商业秘密案件中,对是否应签发临时禁止令、何时签发临时禁止令、签发临时禁止令时申请人需承担哪些举证责任,法律并无具体规定,司法审判中也无统一、具体的标准。本文拟从美国判例法出发,重点研究临时禁止令的签发申请人需承担的举证责任,为我国在商业秘密案件审理过程中对于临时禁止令救济措施的运用提供有益借鉴,同时为我国反不正当竞争法的修订提供参考。
[Abstract]:After joining the Trips agreement, our country has added the "temporary injunction" in the intellectual property law. However, in the trial of trade secrets cases, there are no specific provisions in the law as to whether or not an interim prohibition order should be issued, when an interim prohibition order is issued, and what the burden of proof is to be borne by the applicant when issuing an interim prohibition order. Specific criteria. Starting from the case law of the United States, this paper focuses on the burden of proof to be borne by the applicant for the issuance of a temporary injunction, which provides a useful reference for the application of relief measures of the interim injunction in the course of the trial of trade secrets cases in our country. At the same time for our country anti-unfair competition law revision provides the reference.
【作者单位】： 华东政法大学知识产权学院;
【分类号】：D923.4
[Abstract]:After joining the Trips agreement, our country has added the "temporary injunction" in the intellectual property law. However, in the trial of trade secrets cases, there are no specific provisions in the law as to whether or not an interim prohibition order should be issued, when an interim prohibition order is issued, and what the burden of proof is to be borne by the applicant when issuing an interim prohibition order. Specific criteria. Starting from the case law of the United States, this paper focuses on the burden of proof to be borne by the applicant for the issuance of a temporary injunction, which provides a useful reference for the application of relief measures of the interim injunction in the course of the trial of trade secrets cases in our country. At the same time for our country anti-unfair competition law revision provides the reference.
【作者单位】： 华东政法大学知识产权学院;
【分类号】：D923.4
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前1条
1 黄武双;;英美商业秘密保护中的公共利益抗辩规则及对我国的启示[J];知识产权;2009年02期
【共引文献】
相关期刊论文 前6条
1 李若昕;;商业秘密与新闻自由之辩——以Apple Computer Inc.v.Does案为例[J];国际新闻界;2012年09期
2 王举;;知情权与商业秘密权的冲突与协调[J];湖北警官学院学报;2012年12期
3 王举;;企业商业秘密权与消费者知情权的冲突与协调[J];中共贵州省委党校学报;2012年06期
4 刘秀;关振;;商业秘密刑事保护的价值取向及实现路径[J];刑法论丛;2014年02期
5 李钢;;论技术秘密的公共安全审查机制[J];河南财经政法大学学报;2015年03期
6 王艳，
本文编号：2219406
本文链接：https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/zhishichanquanfa/2219406.html
