“微信”商标的注册争议评析及其解决路径
发布时间：2018-10-26 06:53
【摘要】：商标评审委员会(以下简称"商评委")对"微信"商标不予注册的裁定以及北京知识产权法院作出维持商评委裁定的一审判决,在商标理论界和实务界引起了轩然大波。"微信"商标能否注册,除标志本身是否具有显著性以外,案件的焦点还在于《商标法》第10条第1款第(8)项的"不良影响"应该如何认定和适用。"不良影响"虽然是一种兜底性质的条款,但其适用也应遵循一定的法律理路,有其特定的界限,标志的"不良影响"应从其本身或其构成要素的"音、形、义"方面加以判断,不可作任意的扩张性解释。解决这一争议,需要从延迟公开这一技术层面进行改善以及运用商标共存理念予以克服。
[Abstract]:The decision of the Trademark Review and Adjudication Board (hereinafter referred to as "the Merchants jury") not to register the trademark of WeChat and the decision of the Beijing intellectual property Court to uphold the ruling of the Commercial jury have caused a great uproar in the trademark theoretical and practical circles. " Apart from the significance of the logo itself, the focus of the case is how the "adverse effects" of Article 10 (1) (8) of the Trademark Law should be identified and applied. " Although "adverse influence" is a kind of clause with a bottom character, its application should also follow a certain legal principle and have its specific limits. The "adverse effect" of the mark should be judged from the aspects of "sound, shape and meaning" of its own or its constituent elements. There can be no arbitrary expansionary interpretation. To resolve this dispute, we need to improve the technology of delayed disclosure and use the concept of trademark coexistence to overcome it.
【作者单位】： 武汉大学法学院;
【基金】：“‘和谐世界’理念下国际知识产权制度重构的若干法律问题研究”(项目编号:08BFX083) 教育部人文社会科学重点研究基地基金资助项目“二十一世纪国际知识产权制度发展中的若干重大法律问题研究”(项目编号:07JJD820163)
【分类号】：D923.43
本文编号：2294912
[Abstract]:The decision of the Trademark Review and Adjudication Board (hereinafter referred to as "the Merchants jury") not to register the trademark of WeChat and the decision of the Beijing intellectual property Court to uphold the ruling of the Commercial jury have caused a great uproar in the trademark theoretical and practical circles. " Apart from the significance of the logo itself, the focus of the case is how the "adverse effects" of Article 10 (1) (8) of the Trademark Law should be identified and applied. " Although "adverse influence" is a kind of clause with a bottom character, its application should also follow a certain legal principle and have its specific limits. The "adverse effect" of the mark should be judged from the aspects of "sound, shape and meaning" of its own or its constituent elements. There can be no arbitrary expansionary interpretation. To resolve this dispute, we need to improve the technology of delayed disclosure and use the concept of trademark coexistence to overcome it.
【作者单位】： 武汉大学法学院;
【基金】：“‘和谐世界’理念下国际知识产权制度重构的若干法律问题研究”(项目编号:08BFX083) 教育部人文社会科学重点研究基地基金资助项目“二十一世纪国际知识产权制度发展中的若干重大法律问题研究”(项目编号:07JJD820163)
【分类号】：D923.43
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前1条
1 黄武双;阮开欣;;商标申请人与在后使用人利益的冲突与权衡[J];知识产权;2015年04期
【共引文献】
相关期刊论文 前2条
1 黄汇;;商标法中的公共利益及其保护——以“微信”商标案为对象的逻辑分析与法理展开[J];法学;2015年10期
2 孔祥俊;;论商标法的体系性适用——在《商标法》第8条基础上的展开[J];知识产权;2015年06期
【相似文献】
相关期刊论文 前4条
1 许婕;;试论人大的行政化及其不良影响[J];贵州师范学院学报;2010年11期
2 王文婷;林少河;詹勇;;低俗网站对当代大学生的影响及对策研究[J];学理论;2010年08期
3 ;李小璐陷不雅视频事件,诽谤还是侮辱?[J];法律与生活;2014年11期
4 ;[J];;年期
相关硕士学位论文 前1条
1 张志莲;网络对农村初中生的不良影响及对策研究[D];重庆师范大学;2011年
，本文编号：2294912
本文链接：https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/zhishichanquanfa/2294912.html
