我国专利双轨制保护模式完善问题研究

发布时间：2018-11-02 09:57

【摘要】：知识产权作为一种特殊的民事权利,兼有公权与私权的属性。不仅要保护权利人的民事权益,而且还要维护社会的公共利益。因此,与其他的民事权利相比,专利权的保护除了采取司法保护的途径以外,还可以由管理专利工作的部门通过行政管理的手段进行保护。我国专利权实行的是行政保护与司法保护双轨制模式,是符合我国社会主义国情特色的,同时也符合有关国际公约的规定。该种模式在维护我国市场经济秩序,制止侵权行为,保护专利权人的合法权益方面发挥着重要的作用。一般情况下,行政保护与司法保护并没有冲突可言,但是在知识产权保护领域内,由于知识产权本身的权利属性,特别是相关权利的产生来自不同的行政机关的授予,对于同一个专利侵权事实,专利权人可以分别选择行政保护或是司法保护两个不同的途径予以解决,这就使得专利行政保护与司法保护之间产生紧密联系的同时又产生了冲突。随着越来越多复杂的专利案件,专利行政保护与司法保护双轨制保护模式还存在一些需要解决的法律问题。因此,深入分析我国专利权行政保护与司法保护的不足及之间存在的问题,进一步探讨如何完善我国专利双轨制保护模式是一个具有理论研究价值和现实社会意义的课题。通过对我国专利行政保护与司法保护的论述,提出了目前我国专利双轨制保护模式的不足主要体现在专利确权问题、两者之间的冲突与不协调等问题。这些问题一方面造成了有限的行政资源和司法资源的浪费,另一方面也不利于实现社会的公平正义。我们务必从我国国情出发,分析研究现阶段专利双轨制保护模式的不足,同时借鉴国外的专利保护制度的先进经验,采取一些具体的措施完善双轨制保护模式,如逐步完善相关立法、建立专利行政保护与司法保护机制的协调以及构建网上衔接和信息共享平台等措施,并在此基础上实现专利行政保护与司法保护资源的有效整合,实现更大更优的效力。
[Abstract]:As a special civil right, intellectual property has the attributes of public right and private right. Not only to protect the rights of the civil rights and interests, but also to safeguard the public interest. Therefore, compared with other civil rights, the protection of patent rights can be protected by administrative means in addition to judicial protection. The patent right of our country implements the dual track mode of administrative protection and judicial protection, which accords with the characteristics of socialist national conditions of our country, and also accords with the provisions of relevant international conventions. This model plays an important role in maintaining the order of market economy, stopping infringement and protecting the legitimate rights and interests of patentee. In general, there is no conflict between administrative protection and judicial protection, but in the field of intellectual property protection, due to the property of intellectual property itself, especially the emergence of related rights from different administrative organs, For the same patent infringement facts, the patentee can choose two different ways of administrative protection or judicial protection to solve the problem, which makes the patent administrative protection and judicial protection have close connection and conflict. With more and more complex patent cases, there are still some legal problems that need to be solved in the two-track system of patent administrative protection and judicial protection. Therefore, it is a subject of theoretical research value and practical social significance to deeply analyze the shortcomings and problems between the administrative protection of patent rights and judicial protection in China, and to further explore how to perfect the protection mode of the dual track system of patent in our country. Based on the discussion of administrative and judicial protection of patent in China, this paper points out that the shortcomings of the current mode of patent protection in China are mainly reflected in the problem of patent confirmation right, the conflict and incoordination between the two systems, and so on. These problems, on the one hand, lead to the waste of limited administrative and judicial resources, on the other hand, they are not conducive to the realization of social fairness and justice. We must proceed from the national conditions of our country, analyze and study the shortcomings of the current patent dual-track system protection model, at the same time learn from the advanced experience of foreign patent protection system, and take some concrete measures to perfect the dual-track system protection mode. Such measures as perfecting the relevant legislation, establishing the coordination of patent administrative protection and judicial protection mechanism, constructing the online connection and information sharing platform, and realizing the effective integration of patent administrative protection and judicial protection resources on this basis, To achieve greater and better effectiveness.
【学位授予单位】：湖南师范大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2013
【分类号】：D923.42

【参考文献】