侵犯著作权犯罪疑难问题研究
发布时间:2018-11-06 13:36
【摘要】:21世纪是知识经济的世纪,与知识有关的权利在社会经济发展中将会起到举足轻重的作用,因而知识产权的法律保护尤其是刑事保护应该提到前所未有的高度。但是我国目前对侵犯知识产权犯罪尤其是侵犯著作权犯罪的研究还远没有达到理想的程度,与其他传统的自然犯研究的泛滥成灾相比,侵犯著作权犯罪的研究还是一块尚未充分开发的领域,尤其是随着网络侵犯著作权行为的兴起,我国理论界和实务界对网络侵犯著作权行为是否入罪还未达成共识,使得网络成为滋生侵犯著作权行为的温床,对于我国著作权的法律保护带来负面影响。 本文将重点研究与侵犯著作权类犯罪有关的疑难问题,这些问题都是在理论界悬而未决且具有重要研究价值的。第一章介绍了侵犯著作权类犯罪的概念,并探讨了其罪名和客体问题,最后介绍了我国侵犯著作权类犯罪立法概况。第二章介绍了侵犯著作权类犯罪的数额和停止形态问题,创新性地提出了主观上的数额和客观上的数额的区分,进而提出主观上的数额才是确定罪与非罪的标准。第三章介绍了侵犯著作权类犯罪的主观方面,直接故意和间接故意都可以作为本类犯罪的主观方面,,过失不能构成本类犯罪。第四章是本文的重点,对于网络侵犯著作权行为能否纳入犯罪圈进行了详细的分析,进而得出结论:网络侵犯著作权行为可以构成犯罪。 选取侵犯著作权犯罪疑难问题研究作为论题,可以说很好地联系了当前的形势,具有较强的理论意义和现实意义,同时该论题也属于刑民交叉问题,要求笔者同时具备刑法学、著作权法学、互联网的相关知识,对笔者也是一项挑战,希望本文对于厘清侵犯著作权类犯罪有所贡献。
[Abstract]:The 21st century is the century of knowledge economy, and the rights related to knowledge will play an important role in the development of social economy. Therefore, the legal protection of intellectual property, especially the criminal protection, should be raised to an unprecedented height. However, at present, the research on the crime of infringing intellectual property rights, especially the crime of infringing copyright, is far from reaching the ideal level in our country. Compared with the overflowing of other traditional researches on natural crime, The research on the crime of infringing copyright is still a field that has not been fully developed, especially with the rise of network infringement of copyright, the theorists and practitioners of our country have not reached a consensus on whether the infringement of copyright by network is criminalized or not. The network has become the breeding ground for copyright infringement, which has a negative impact on the legal protection of copyright in China. This paper will focus on the problems related to the crime of copyright infringement, which are pending in the theoretical circle and have important research value. The first chapter introduces the concept of the crime of infringing copyright and probes into its charge and object. Finally, it introduces the general situation of the legislation of the crime of infringing on copyright in our country. The second chapter introduces the amount and stop form of the crime of infringing copyright, and innovatively puts forward the distinction between the subjective amount and the objective amount, and then points out that the subjective amount is the standard to determine the crime and non-crime. The third chapter introduces the subjective aspects of copyright infringement crimes. Both direct and indirect intent can be regarded as the subjective aspects of this type of crime, and negligence cannot constitute this kind of crime. The fourth chapter is the focus of this paper, the network infringement of copyright can be included into the criminal circle of detailed analysis, and then reached a conclusion: network infringement of copyright can constitute a crime. Selecting the research on the difficult problem of the crime of infringing copyright as the topic, it can be said that the current situation is well linked, which has strong theoretical and practical significance. At the same time, the topic also belongs to the cross-question of criminal law and people, which requires the author to have criminal law at the same time. Copyright law, the relevant knowledge of the Internet, is also a challenge to the author, I hope this article to clarify the crime of copyright infringement.
【学位授予单位】:华东政法大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2013
【分类号】:D924;D923.41
本文编号:2314431
[Abstract]:The 21st century is the century of knowledge economy, and the rights related to knowledge will play an important role in the development of social economy. Therefore, the legal protection of intellectual property, especially the criminal protection, should be raised to an unprecedented height. However, at present, the research on the crime of infringing intellectual property rights, especially the crime of infringing copyright, is far from reaching the ideal level in our country. Compared with the overflowing of other traditional researches on natural crime, The research on the crime of infringing copyright is still a field that has not been fully developed, especially with the rise of network infringement of copyright, the theorists and practitioners of our country have not reached a consensus on whether the infringement of copyright by network is criminalized or not. The network has become the breeding ground for copyright infringement, which has a negative impact on the legal protection of copyright in China. This paper will focus on the problems related to the crime of copyright infringement, which are pending in the theoretical circle and have important research value. The first chapter introduces the concept of the crime of infringing copyright and probes into its charge and object. Finally, it introduces the general situation of the legislation of the crime of infringing on copyright in our country. The second chapter introduces the amount and stop form of the crime of infringing copyright, and innovatively puts forward the distinction between the subjective amount and the objective amount, and then points out that the subjective amount is the standard to determine the crime and non-crime. The third chapter introduces the subjective aspects of copyright infringement crimes. Both direct and indirect intent can be regarded as the subjective aspects of this type of crime, and negligence cannot constitute this kind of crime. The fourth chapter is the focus of this paper, the network infringement of copyright can be included into the criminal circle of detailed analysis, and then reached a conclusion: network infringement of copyright can constitute a crime. Selecting the research on the difficult problem of the crime of infringing copyright as the topic, it can be said that the current situation is well linked, which has strong theoretical and practical significance. At the same time, the topic also belongs to the cross-question of criminal law and people, which requires the author to have criminal law at the same time. Copyright law, the relevant knowledge of the Internet, is also a challenge to the author, I hope this article to clarify the crime of copyright infringement.
【学位授予单位】:华东政法大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2013
【分类号】:D924;D923.41
【共引文献】
相关期刊论文 前5条
1 周娅;曾姝;;知识产权犯罪数额之规范分析[J];佛山科学技术学院学报(社会科学版);2011年05期
2 黄铭宇;;论侵犯商业秘密罪的损害结果[J];消费导刊;2009年09期
3 刘伟;;经济刑法规范适用的独立性判断问题[J];刑法论丛;2013年02期
4 黄铭宇;;论假冒注册商标罪与生产、销售伪劣商品罪的界限[J];中国商界(下半月);2009年05期
5 王静;;侵犯著作权罪与销售侵权复制品罪的关系——以“复制发行”与“销售”的关系为中心[J];刑事法评论;2012年02期
相关硕士学位论文 前10条
1 范丁文;销售侵权复制品罪若干问题研究[D];华东政法大学;2011年
2 叶红红;假冒注册商标罪疑难问题研究[D];南京师范大学;2011年
3 唐丹优;侵犯知识产权犯罪的基本问题研究[D];贵州师范大学;2008年
4 姜媛媛;论侵犯知识产权罪未完成形态的存在根据[D];湘潭大学;2008年
5 包蓉;论假冒注册商标罪的客观要件[D];湘潭大学;2008年
6 陈丽芳;侵犯商业秘密罪客观方面之研究[D];中国青年政治学院;2008年
7 甘海涛;论知识产权法院之构建[D];青岛大学;2009年
8 孔文谕;论侵犯商业秘密犯罪的危害结果及损失计算[D];上海交通大学;2008年
9 王丹;侵犯著作权罪研究[D];中国青年政治学院;2010年
10 朱柳;略论我国商标犯罪的若干问题[D];华东政法大学;2012年
本文编号:2314431
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/zhishichanquanfa/2314431.html