我国对TPP知识产权民事赔偿规则的法律应对
发布时间：2018-11-17 09:25
【摘要】：跨太平洋伙伴关系协定(Trans-Pacific Partnership Agreement,简称 TPP)是国际重要的多边经济谈判组织,因美国加入和推动而引起世界广泛关注。2017年1月美国宣布退出TPP,再次引起广泛讨论。该组织于2015年成功结束贸易谈判,并达成TPP协议。TPP知识产权民事赔偿规则的保护标准要远远高于我国以TRIPS协议为基础的民事赔偿规则的保护标准。本文将TPP民事赔偿规则与TRIPS协议民事赔偿规则相对比,反思我国民事赔偿规则的不足。在此基础上,充分论证我国知识产权民事赔偿规则应对TPP的必要性,进而对我国民事赔偿规则提出法律应对建议。TPP规则在赔偿责任主体,赔偿范围,赔偿方式方面提出高标准赔偿规则。其中诉讼费用的主体支付规则、合理价值评估规则以及惩罚性赔偿方式适用规则充分保护了权利人的合法权利,严惩侵权行为,保障知识产权贸易顺利进行,符合世界知识产权发展趋势,为完善我国法律规范提供样本。在确定赔偿范围和标准时,采用合理价值评估规则,司法机关综合考虑权利人所提交的任何合理价值证据,同时对其进行评估判断,结合我国的司法实践,综合确定赔偿数额,充分保护权利人的合法权利。在权利人通过法律途径维护自身权利的问题上,法律应当在一定程度上给予权利人充分维护自身权利的方式,自主选择法定赔偿方式或惩罚性赔偿方式。在诉讼费用主体支付责任方面,法律应明确规定败诉方支付在诉讼中产生的合理费用,明确主体责任,维护司法实践的统一与稳定。TPP规则为民事赔偿规则发展起到示范和引领作用。我国应该充分利用TPP给我国法律制度发展带来的契机,积极应对TPP所带来的挑战,结合我国司法实践,树立符合我国发展的高标准的知识产权制度,充分维护正当权利人的合法权利,在国际社会赢得话语权和主动权,这是知识产权法律规范的职责所在,是法治社会的必然要求,也是法律人的毕生追求。
[Abstract]:The Trans-Pacific Partnership Agreement (Trans-Pacific Partnership Agreement,) is an important international multilateral economic negotiation organization, which has attracted worldwide attention because of the United States' accession and promotion. In January 2017, the announcement of the withdrawal of the United States from the TPP, has once again aroused widespread discussion. The organization successfully concluded the trade negotiations in 2015 and reached the TPP agreement. The protection standard of the TPP intellectual property civil compensation rules is much higher than that of the civil compensation rules based on the TRIPS agreement in our country. This paper compares the TPP civil compensation rules with the TRIPS civil compensation rules and reflects on the shortcomings of China's civil compensation rules. On this basis, it fully demonstrates the necessity of the civil compensation rules of intellectual property rights in our country in response to TPP, and then puts forward legal suggestions to the civil compensation rules of our country. The TPP rules are in the main body of compensation and the scope of compensation. In the form of compensation, a high standard compensation rule is proposed. The rules of payment of litigation expenses, the rules of reasonable value evaluation and the applicable rules of punitive damages have fully protected the legitimate rights of the obligee, severely punished the infringement, and ensured the smooth progress of the trade in intellectual property. In line with the development trend of intellectual property in the world, provide a sample for perfecting the legal norms of our country. In determining the scope and standard of compensation, the judicial organs should adopt the rule of reasonable value evaluation, consider comprehensively any reasonable value evidence submitted by the obligee, at the same time evaluate and judge it, combine the judicial practice of our country, comprehensively determine the amount of compensation. The legitimate rights of the obligee shall be fully protected. To a certain extent, the law should give the right holder the right to fully protect their own rights, and choose the legal compensation or punitive compensation. In respect of the liability of the subject of the lawsuit, the law should clearly stipulate that the losing party should pay the reasonable expenses incurred in the lawsuit, and make clear the responsibility of the subject. Maintain the unity and stability of judicial practice. TPP rules play an exemplary and leading role in the development of civil compensation rules. Our country should make full use of the opportunity that TPP brings to the development of our legal system, actively respond to the challenge brought by TPP, combine with our judicial practice, set up a high standard intellectual property system that accords with the development of our country. It is the duty of intellectual property legal norms, the inevitable requirement of the society of rule of law, and the pursuit of the legal person's life to fully safeguard the legitimate rights of the legitimate right holder and win the right of speech and initiative in the international community.
【学位授予单位】：天津师范大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2017
【分类号】：D997.1
本文编号：2337288
[Abstract]:The Trans-Pacific Partnership Agreement (Trans-Pacific Partnership Agreement,) is an important international multilateral economic negotiation organization, which has attracted worldwide attention because of the United States' accession and promotion. In January 2017, the announcement of the withdrawal of the United States from the TPP, has once again aroused widespread discussion. The organization successfully concluded the trade negotiations in 2015 and reached the TPP agreement. The protection standard of the TPP intellectual property civil compensation rules is much higher than that of the civil compensation rules based on the TRIPS agreement in our country. This paper compares the TPP civil compensation rules with the TRIPS civil compensation rules and reflects on the shortcomings of China's civil compensation rules. On this basis, it fully demonstrates the necessity of the civil compensation rules of intellectual property rights in our country in response to TPP, and then puts forward legal suggestions to the civil compensation rules of our country. The TPP rules are in the main body of compensation and the scope of compensation. In the form of compensation, a high standard compensation rule is proposed. The rules of payment of litigation expenses, the rules of reasonable value evaluation and the applicable rules of punitive damages have fully protected the legitimate rights of the obligee, severely punished the infringement, and ensured the smooth progress of the trade in intellectual property. In line with the development trend of intellectual property in the world, provide a sample for perfecting the legal norms of our country. In determining the scope and standard of compensation, the judicial organs should adopt the rule of reasonable value evaluation, consider comprehensively any reasonable value evidence submitted by the obligee, at the same time evaluate and judge it, combine the judicial practice of our country, comprehensively determine the amount of compensation. The legitimate rights of the obligee shall be fully protected. To a certain extent, the law should give the right holder the right to fully protect their own rights, and choose the legal compensation or punitive compensation. In respect of the liability of the subject of the lawsuit, the law should clearly stipulate that the losing party should pay the reasonable expenses incurred in the lawsuit, and make clear the responsibility of the subject. Maintain the unity and stability of judicial practice. TPP rules play an exemplary and leading role in the development of civil compensation rules. Our country should make full use of the opportunity that TPP brings to the development of our legal system, actively respond to the challenge brought by TPP, combine with our judicial practice, set up a high standard intellectual property system that accords with the development of our country. It is the duty of intellectual property legal norms, the inevitable requirement of the society of rule of law, and the pursuit of the legal person's life to fully safeguard the legitimate rights of the legitimate right holder and win the right of speech and initiative in the international community.
【学位授予单位】：天津师范大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2017
【分类号】：D997.1
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前1条
1 周雪雅;;TPP知识产权规则及其影响[J];合作经济与科技;2016年17期
相关硕士学位论文 前6条
1 马灵飞;TPP知识产权保护的高标准及其应对[D];东北财经大学;2015年
2 钱鑫;浅析TPP的发展前景以及对中国的影响[D];外交学院;2014年
3 谢中伟;论TPP中知识产权保护规则的新趋势[D];华东政法大学;2014年
4 郑双双;跨太平洋伙伴关系协定（TPP）法律层面解析与对策[D];苏州大学;2014年
5 侯云哲;美国加入TPP对中国的影响及对策研究[D];河北大学;2013年
6 张琳达;跨太平洋伙伴关系协议（TPP）对中国未来对外贸易影响分析[D];吉林大学;2013年
，本文编号：2337288
本文链接：https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/zhishichanquanfa/2337288.html
