“反弹琵琶”专利侵权案的法律分析

发布时间：2018-11-21 09:43

【摘要】：外观设计是一类重要的知识产权客体,外观设计将工业实用性与艺术美感结合在商品上,提升了商品的交换价值,其在商业上所能带来的利润甚至高于技术创新。目前,主要的知识产权国际公约均规定成员国应当保护工业品外观设计,但对于具体适用何种法律制度保护外观设计,却没有限定,世界各国在立法和司法实践中的做法也不近相同。另外,在专利侵权案件中,特别是外观设计和实用新型专利侵权案件中,往往有专利权有效性争议伴随其中,给专利权人维权造成诸多不利影响。本文通过对甘肃纪元文化艺术有限公司诉兰州颜珑工艺制品有限公司“反弹琵琶”外观设计专利侵权案的分析,就其中外观设计专利权与著作权的权利竞合,无效宣告程序对专利侵权诉讼的影响等法律问题涉及的理论进行研究；紧接着文章主要论述在外观设计上著作权与专利权存在竞合,并且承认双重保护的情况下,产生的权利重叠和权利冲突问题,进一步来说,考虑到著作权与专利权在取得条件、取得方式、保护期限、失效方式和保护强度等方面均存在较大差异,在具体案件中我们应当考虑那些相关因素,做到对外观设计保护方案的优选,最大限度地维护自身合法权益；另外本文通过对专利权有效性争议属性的分析,本着为当事人最大程度地节约诉讼成本的目的,尝试对专利无效宣告程序进行完善；最后,本文就如何合理利用现行法律制度,采取相应的措施,来应对被控侵权人利用无效宣告程序拖延诉讼程序的顺利进行,提出了对策与建议。
[Abstract]:Design is a kind of important intellectual property object. It combines industrial practicability and artistic beauty on commodity, and promotes the exchange value of commodity, which can bring more profit than technological innovation in commerce. At present, the major international conventions on intellectual property rights stipulate that member States should protect industrial designs, but there are no restrictions on the specific legal system to be applied to protect them. Countries in the world in the legislative and judicial practice is not nearly the same. In addition, in patent infringement cases, especially in design and utility model patent infringement cases, there are often patent validity disputes, which cause a lot of adverse impact on the rights of the patentee. Based on the analysis of Gansu Epoch Culture and Art Co., Ltd. v. Lanzhou Yanlong Craft products Co., Ltd. "rebounding Pipa" design patent infringement case, this paper discusses the competition between design patent right and copyright right. The theory related to the influence of invalidation procedure on patent infringement litigation is studied. Then the article mainly discusses the competition between copyright and patent right in appearance design, and recognizes the overlapping of rights and conflicts of rights in the case of dual protection. Further, considering the conditions of obtaining copyright and patent right, There are great differences in the way of obtaining, the period of protection, the mode of failure and the intensity of protection, etc. In the specific cases, we should consider the relevant factors and make the best choice of the protection scheme of the exterior design. To protect their legitimate rights and interests to the maximum extent; In addition, through the analysis of the validity of patent rights, in order to save the cost of litigation to the maximum extent, this paper tries to improve the procedure of patent invalidation. Finally, this paper puts forward some countermeasures and suggestions on how to make rational use of the current legal system and take corresponding measures to deal with the accused infringer using the invalid declaration procedure to delay the proceedings.
【学位授予单位】：兰州大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2013
【分类号】：D923.42

【参考文献】