云计算环境下我国著作权问题研究
发布时间：2018-11-23 18:49
【摘要】：历史上看，传播技术的发展必然会导致著作权法的更新。印刷术的出现产生了复制权，录音录像设备的出现产生了出租权，由于信息技术和网络传输技术的发展，催生了信息网络传播权……云计算作为最新的科学技术，是对传统网络技术的变革，其出现改变了人们产生、传递和分享信息的方式。本文试图从国际上云计算最新的判例出发，，结合我国立法及司法实践，探讨云计算对我国著作权法的挑战及我国完善相关立法的建议。 第一章主要对云计算的定义及其模式进行概述，以及此项对著作权法的总体影响。云计算主要分为三大模式：IaaS模式，PaaS模式和SaaS模式，其中SaaS模式与用户的关系最为密切，也是产生著作权问题最多的模式。在此环境下形成的缓存、临时复制问题以及其他传播技术的问题，使得包括美国在内的国家都寻求各种方式解决新技术对著作权法的影响。 第二章立足我国立法和司法实践，分析云计算对我国著作权法的冲击主要集中在三个问题：信息网络传播权、复制权及出租权。我国信息网络传播权源自国际知识产权组织的两个公约，然而在权利名称上却与别不同。这样的名称难以涵盖目前三网融合的环境以及未来技术的进一步发展。而且我国信息网络传播在权利内容上也有需要进一步厘清的必要。临时复制在电子技术和信息网络技术出现开始就一直存在争议，云计算使得临时复制成为常态，如此再把临时复制拒绝在复制权外也显得不合时宜。在云计算SaaS模式使得软件使用行为发生转变，当前的信息网络传播权难以涵盖这一内容。对于这种行为不应再通过信息网络传播权规制，而是应当选择其他权利去规制这一行为。 第三章通过各种学说的对比分析和比较法研究，对我国当前遇到的知识产权问题提出相关建议：为适应科技的发展和加强全球知识产权交流，应当对信息网络传播权的定义进行相关调整，将其名称变成对公众传播权并且对权利内容进行进一步厘清。临时复制根据其产生的特征分成技术性临时复制和非技术性临时复制两种，非技术性临时复制应当在复制权的调整范围内。SaaS模式下的软件使用行为将会成为未来软件使用的一个重要形式，通过网络进行交付的软件使用可以通过扩张出租权，即通过电子出租权对此行为进行规制。
[Abstract]:Historically, the development of communication technology will inevitably lead to the renewal of copyright law. The emergence of printing produces the right of reproduction and the appearance of audio and video recording equipment gives rise to the right to rent. Because of the development of information technology and network transmission technology, the right of information transmission on the network is given birth to. Cloud computing, as the latest science and technology, is a revolution to the traditional network technology, which changes the way that people produce, transmit and share information. This paper attempts to discuss the challenges of cloud computing to China's copyright law and the suggestions to perfect the relevant legislation from the latest cases of cloud computing in the world, combined with the legislation and judicial practice of our country. The first chapter summarizes the definition and mode of cloud computing, and its overall impact on copyright law. Cloud computing is mainly divided into three modes: IaaS mode, PaaS mode and SaaS mode. Among them, the SaaS model is the most closely related to users, and it is also the mode that produces the most copyright problems. The problems of caching, temporary replication and other communication technologies in this environment have led countries, including the United States, to seek ways to resolve the impact of new technologies on copyright law. The second chapter analyzes the impact of cloud computing on China's copyright law based on our legislation and judicial practice. It focuses on three issues: the right to information network dissemination, the right to copy and the right to rent out. The right of information network communication in China originates from the two conventions of the International intellectual property Organization (WIPO), but the name of the right is different from that of the other. Such a name is difficult to cover the current three-network convergence environment and the further development of future technology. Moreover, it is necessary to clarify the right content of information network communication in our country. Temporary replication has been controversial since the emergence of electronic technology and information network technology. Cloud computing makes temporary replication the norm, so it is inappropriate to reject temporary replication outside the right of replication. In the cloud computing SaaS mode, the behavior of software usage is changed, which is difficult to be covered by the current information network dissemination right. This kind of behavior should not be regulated by information network transmission right, but should be regulated by other rights. In the third chapter, through the comparative analysis and comparative study of various theories, the author puts forward some suggestions on intellectual property issues in China: to adapt to the development of science and technology and to strengthen the global intellectual property exchange. The definition of information network communication right should be adjusted to change its name into public communication right and clarify the content of the right. Temporary replication is divided into technical temporary replication and non-technical temporary replication according to the characteristics it produces. The behavior of software usage in SaaS mode will become an important form of software use in the future. Namely through the electronic rental right to regulate this behavior.
【学位授予单位】：广东外语外贸大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2014
【分类号】：D923.41
本文编号：2352408
[Abstract]:Historically, the development of communication technology will inevitably lead to the renewal of copyright law. The emergence of printing produces the right of reproduction and the appearance of audio and video recording equipment gives rise to the right to rent. Because of the development of information technology and network transmission technology, the right of information transmission on the network is given birth to. Cloud computing, as the latest science and technology, is a revolution to the traditional network technology, which changes the way that people produce, transmit and share information. This paper attempts to discuss the challenges of cloud computing to China's copyright law and the suggestions to perfect the relevant legislation from the latest cases of cloud computing in the world, combined with the legislation and judicial practice of our country. The first chapter summarizes the definition and mode of cloud computing, and its overall impact on copyright law. Cloud computing is mainly divided into three modes: IaaS mode, PaaS mode and SaaS mode. Among them, the SaaS model is the most closely related to users, and it is also the mode that produces the most copyright problems. The problems of caching, temporary replication and other communication technologies in this environment have led countries, including the United States, to seek ways to resolve the impact of new technologies on copyright law. The second chapter analyzes the impact of cloud computing on China's copyright law based on our legislation and judicial practice. It focuses on three issues: the right to information network dissemination, the right to copy and the right to rent out. The right of information network communication in China originates from the two conventions of the International intellectual property Organization (WIPO), but the name of the right is different from that of the other. Such a name is difficult to cover the current three-network convergence environment and the further development of future technology. Moreover, it is necessary to clarify the right content of information network communication in our country. Temporary replication has been controversial since the emergence of electronic technology and information network technology. Cloud computing makes temporary replication the norm, so it is inappropriate to reject temporary replication outside the right of replication. In the cloud computing SaaS mode, the behavior of software usage is changed, which is difficult to be covered by the current information network dissemination right. This kind of behavior should not be regulated by information network transmission right, but should be regulated by other rights. In the third chapter, through the comparative analysis and comparative study of various theories, the author puts forward some suggestions on intellectual property issues in China: to adapt to the development of science and technology and to strengthen the global intellectual property exchange. The definition of information network communication right should be adjusted to change its name into public communication right and clarify the content of the right. Temporary replication is divided into technical temporary replication and non-technical temporary replication according to the characteristics it produces. The behavior of software usage in SaaS mode will become an important form of software use in the future. Namely through the electronic rental right to regulate this behavior.
【学位授予单位】：广东外语外贸大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2014
【分类号】：D923.41
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 于志良;;云计算现状研究[J];电脑开发与应用;2010年10期
2 朱理;;临时复制是否属于著作权法意义上的复制——以国际公约为核心的规范分析[J];电子知识产权;2007年01期
3 彭强;魏森;;对云计算知识产权保护的思考[J];电子知识产权;2011年12期
4 彭学龙;;论著作权语境下的获取权[J];法商研究;2010年04期
5 冯晓青;付继存;;著作权法中的复制权研究[J];法学家;2011年03期
6 王迁;;论“网络传播行为”的界定及其侵权认定[J];法学;2006年05期
7 梁志文;;云计算、技术中立与版权责任[J];法学;2011年03期
8 刘迪;;浅析云计算下的版权技术保护措施[J];法制与经济(中旬);2012年05期
9 董颖;;解决云计算SaaS模式下版权问题的另一途径[J];电子知识产权;2012年12期
10 张今;郭斯伦;;著作财产权体系的反思与重构[J];法商研究;2012年04期
本文编号：2352408
本文链接：https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/zhishichanquanfa/2352408.html
