我国知识产权领域恶意诉讼的程序法规制
发布时间：2018-11-25 18:45
【摘要】：随着知识经济的脚步声，国家之间、企业之间的知识产权纠纷不断，知识产权保护已经成为一个热门话题。民事诉讼是保护知识产权最后的也是最有利的法律手段，熟练掌握知识产权诉讼的法律知识并灵活运用，最大限度的保护权利人的正当利益。但是，在强化诉讼权保护的同时，也应注意到类似“专利流氓”、“专利螳螂”的出现，这是一种非法滥用诉权的现象。 知识产权具有垄断性和排他性，恶意诉讼行为人就是利用这种特性，以保护知识产权为名义，挤兑竞争对手，使得对方不仅商誉受损，同时可能失掉宝贵的商业机会和市场，造成精神和物质上的双重损失等。应对知识产权领域出现的恶意诉讼行为进行规制，否则将损害相对人的合法权益，阻碍我国知识产权战略的实施，浪费有限的司法资源。 我国现行法律中，只有个别条文涉及知识产权恶意诉讼的规制，从总体来说仍较为浅显、分散，没有形成体系，也没有对知识产权恶意诉讼进行识别及程序上的规制。 本文结合新《民事诉讼法》与知识产权相关法的特殊规定，以程序法为角度，重点研究如何从程序法中完善相关的制度，从而实现对知识产权领域恶意诉讼行为进行有效规制。本文主要包括以下四部分内容： 第一部分，从学术争议、含义和特征对知识产权领域的恶意诉讼行为进行界定，并结合我国的知识产权战略等分析知识产权领域恶意诉讼程序法规制的意义； 第二部分，在对知识产权领域恶意诉讼行为进行程序法规制前，结合侵权责任法的四个构成要件对恶意诉讼行为进行识别。并归纳司法实践中知识产权领域恶意诉讼的常见类型，以期有利于知识产权恶意诉讼的实践应用； 第三部分，，结合我国新《民事诉讼法》及知识产权相关法的特殊规定，从诉前禁令抗辩、专业技术的审查判断、事后的救济措施三个主要途径分析知识产权恶意诉讼程序法规制； 第四部分，在前文相关分析的基础之上，指出我国知识产权领域恶意诉讼程序法规制存在的不足之处，结合国外的相关立法和实践案例，从立法和路径完善这两个方面提出建议，以期对司法实践中恶意诉讼的减少起到一定的作用。
[Abstract]:With the footsteps of knowledge economy, intellectual property rights protection has become a hot topic among countries and enterprises. Civil action is the last and most advantageous legal means to protect intellectual property rights. However, while strengthening the protection of litigation rights, we should also pay attention to the appearance of "patent rogue" and "patent mantis", which is a phenomenon of illegal abuse of the right of action. Intellectual property rights are monopolistic and exclusive, and malicious litigation perpetrators take advantage of this characteristic, in the name of protecting intellectual property rights, run away competitors, making each other not only damage their goodwill, but also lose valuable business opportunities and markets. Cause the double loss of spirit and material, etc. We should regulate the malicious litigation in the field of intellectual property, otherwise it will damage the legitimate rights and interests of the relative person, hinder the implementation of the intellectual property strategy of our country, and waste limited judicial resources. In the current law of our country, only a few articles are related to the regulation of malicious litigation of intellectual property, which is still relatively simple, scattered, and does not form a system, nor does it identify and regulate the malicious litigation of intellectual property as a whole. Based on the special provisions of the new Civil procedure Law and the intellectual property Law, this paper focuses on how to perfect the relevant system from the procedural law, so as to realize the effective regulation of malicious litigation in the field of intellectual property. This article mainly includes the following four parts: the first part, from the academic dispute, the meaning and the characteristic carries on the definition to the intellectual property domain malicious lawsuit behavior, Combining with our country's intellectual property strategy, this paper analyzes the significance of malicious litigation procedure law system in the field of intellectual property. The second part, before regulating the malicious litigation in the field of intellectual property, combined with the four constitutive elements of tort liability law to identify the malicious litigation. And summarizes the common types of malicious litigation in the field of intellectual property rights in judicial practice, in order to facilitate the practical application of malicious litigation of intellectual property rights; The third part, combined with the special provisions of our new Civil procedure Law and intellectual property related laws, from the pre-lawsuit prohibition defense, professional and technical review and judgment, There are three main ways to analyze the rules and regulations of the malicious procedure of intellectual property rights. The fourth part, on the basis of the previous related analysis, points out the shortcomings of the malicious litigation procedure law system in the field of intellectual property rights in our country, combined with the relevant legislation and practice cases abroad. Some suggestions are put forward from the aspects of legislation and path perfection in order to play a certain role in the reduction of malicious litigation in judicial practice.
【学位授予单位】：华南理工大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2014
【分类号】：D923.4;D925.1
本文编号：2357072
[Abstract]:With the footsteps of knowledge economy, intellectual property rights protection has become a hot topic among countries and enterprises. Civil action is the last and most advantageous legal means to protect intellectual property rights. However, while strengthening the protection of litigation rights, we should also pay attention to the appearance of "patent rogue" and "patent mantis", which is a phenomenon of illegal abuse of the right of action. Intellectual property rights are monopolistic and exclusive, and malicious litigation perpetrators take advantage of this characteristic, in the name of protecting intellectual property rights, run away competitors, making each other not only damage their goodwill, but also lose valuable business opportunities and markets. Cause the double loss of spirit and material, etc. We should regulate the malicious litigation in the field of intellectual property, otherwise it will damage the legitimate rights and interests of the relative person, hinder the implementation of the intellectual property strategy of our country, and waste limited judicial resources. In the current law of our country, only a few articles are related to the regulation of malicious litigation of intellectual property, which is still relatively simple, scattered, and does not form a system, nor does it identify and regulate the malicious litigation of intellectual property as a whole. Based on the special provisions of the new Civil procedure Law and the intellectual property Law, this paper focuses on how to perfect the relevant system from the procedural law, so as to realize the effective regulation of malicious litigation in the field of intellectual property. This article mainly includes the following four parts: the first part, from the academic dispute, the meaning and the characteristic carries on the definition to the intellectual property domain malicious lawsuit behavior, Combining with our country's intellectual property strategy, this paper analyzes the significance of malicious litigation procedure law system in the field of intellectual property. The second part, before regulating the malicious litigation in the field of intellectual property, combined with the four constitutive elements of tort liability law to identify the malicious litigation. And summarizes the common types of malicious litigation in the field of intellectual property rights in judicial practice, in order to facilitate the practical application of malicious litigation of intellectual property rights; The third part, combined with the special provisions of our new Civil procedure Law and intellectual property related laws, from the pre-lawsuit prohibition defense, professional and technical review and judgment, There are three main ways to analyze the rules and regulations of the malicious procedure of intellectual property rights. The fourth part, on the basis of the previous related analysis, points out the shortcomings of the malicious litigation procedure law system in the field of intellectual property rights in our country, combined with the relevant legislation and practice cases abroad. Some suggestions are put forward from the aspects of legislation and path perfection in order to play a certain role in the reduction of malicious litigation in judicial practice.
【学位授予单位】：华南理工大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2014
【分类号】：D923.4;D925.1
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 卞辉;;知识产权恶意诉讼的程序法应对[J];电子知识产权;2009年10期
2 董晓敏;;论知识产权诉讼中的临时禁令[J];法律适用;2008年07期
3 曹新明;;现有技术抗辩研究[J];法商研究;2010年06期
4 徐爱国;;英美法中“滥用法律诉讼”的侵权责任[J];法学家;2000年02期
5 姚颉靖;陈剑锋;;浅析知识产权诉前禁令制度的不足与完善[J];郑州经济管理干部学院学报;2007年04期
6 赵雪彦;黎伟华;;惩治恶意诉讼的法律尴尬[J];民主与法制;2007年06期
7 刘晴辉;;正当程序视野下的诉前禁令制度[J];清华法学;2008年04期
8 李丹宁;陈爽;;议我国知识产权恶意诉讼之法律规制[J];中国市场;2008年52期
9 李晓秋;;未决之命题:规制专利恶意诉讼的“路”与“困”——兼评新《专利法》第23条、第62条[J];学术论坛;2010年02期
10 李扬;;《专利法》第三次修订草案送审稿的意见和建议[J];学习论坛;2007年06期
本文编号：2357072
本文链接：https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/zhishichanquanfa/2357072.html
