技术标准中专利权滥用问题的探讨
发布时间：2018-12-14 21:43
【摘要】：随着科学技术的发展，技术标准专利化已是一种必然趋势，不少国家的标准化组织均制定专门的知识产权政策，来应对这种趋势下的知识产权许可，规制各种专利权滥用问题。相对而言，我国标准化组织对此问题的研究起步较晚，缺乏深入研究。因此，开展技术标准中的研究对我国而言是迫切且具现实意义的。 本文第一章以阐述标准化制度、技术标准内涵和专利权特点三个概念始，指出伴随着全球知识经济的日益强化，无论是从满足技术标准的制定、专利权人的利益需求还是全球自由贸易环境下的战略选择，，传统观念中技术标准与专利这两个性质上看似完全相悖的概念的结合已是一种无法避免的趋势。在此基础上，分析了两者结合的效果，由此带出了本文要探讨的问题：技术标准中专利权滥用问题。 第二章通过列举四个典型事例：美国戴尔电脑公司案、思科诉华为案、DVD事件和MPEG-2技术标准专利池，详尽阐述了技术标准中专利权滥用行为主要表现为专利权人一方面通过各种手段积极推进其专利技术标准化，另一方面又利用自己手中的专利权操纵标准的制定与实施，在技术标准的制定与实施阶段构成专利权的滥用。 第三章通过分析国际性标准化组织、区域标准化组织、主要发达国家标准化组织解决技术标准专利权问题的主要手段，概括出目前国外标准化组织对技术标准中专利权滥用的规制主要体现在三大方面：标准制定过程中的必要专利制度、专利信息披露制度和技术标准中专利权的“公平、合理、无歧视”许可。通过两典型案例：Rambus公司专利侵权案和苹果告摩托罗拉滥用标准必要专利诉讼的分析，对此三大规制专利权滥用的知识产权政策的利弊进行了全面的分析。 第四章以我国标准化组织对技术标准中涉及专利问题的基本考虑入手，建议我国标准化组织可从自身的利益出发，通过加强和细化标准化组织的专利政策、完善我国《专利法》中的相关制度和完善《标准化法》下的相关配套规则等手段，制定一套与本国知识产权法律法规相配套的标准知识产权保护策略，以达到平衡社会公众与专利权人的利益，进一步规范我国知识产权标准化行为的目的。
[Abstract]:With the development of science and technology, the patenting of technical standards has become an inevitable trend. Many countries' standardization organizations have formulated special intellectual property policies to deal with the licensing of intellectual property under this trend and to regulate the abuse of various patent rights. Comparatively speaking, our country standardization organization to this question research starts relatively late, lacks the thorough research. Therefore, the research in technical standards is urgent and practical significance for our country. The first chapter begins with the three concepts of standardization system, connotation of technical standards and characteristics of patent rights, and points out that with the increasing strengthening of the global knowledge economy, whether from the formulation of meeting the technical standards, The patentee's interest demand is still the strategic choice under the global free trade environment. The combination of the two seemingly contradictory concepts in the traditional concept of technology standard and patent has become an inevitable trend. On this basis, this paper analyzes the effect of the combination of the two, and brings out the problem to be discussed in this paper: the abuse of patent right in the technical standard. The second chapter enumerates four typical examples: the Dell computer Corporation case, Cisco v. Huawei case, DVD case and MPEG-2 Technology Standard Patent Pool, This paper expounds in detail that the abuse of patent rights in technical standards is mainly manifested in the fact that the patentee, on the one hand, actively promotes the standardization of his patent technology through various means, on the other hand, makes use of his own patent right to manipulate the standard to formulate and implement the standard. In the technical standard formulation and implementation stage constitutes the patent right abuse. The third chapter analyzes the main means of solving the problem of patent rights of technical standards by international standardization organization, regional standardization organization and major developed countries' standardization organization. At present, the regulation of patent abuse in technical standards by foreign standardization organizations is mainly embodied in three aspects: the necessary patent system in the process of standard establishment, the patent information disclosure system and the patent right in the technical standard. Permit without discrimination. Through the analysis of two typical cases: patent infringement case of Rambus Company and Apple suing Motorola for abuse of Standard essential Patent Litigation, the advantages and disadvantages of the three intellectual property policies regulating patent abuse are comprehensively analyzed. The fourth chapter starts with the basic considerations of the technical standards involved in patent issues in China's Standardization Organization, and suggests that China's Standardization Organization may proceed from its own interests by strengthening and refining the ISO's patent policy. To perfect the relevant systems in the Patent Law of our country and the relevant supporting rules under the Standardization Law, and to formulate a set of standard intellectual property protection strategies that are compatible with the laws and regulations of our country's intellectual property rights. In order to balance the interests of the public and patentee and further standardize the standardization of intellectual property rights in China.
【学位授予单位】：华南理工大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2013
【分类号】：D923.42
本文编号：2379369
[Abstract]:With the development of science and technology, the patenting of technical standards has become an inevitable trend. Many countries' standardization organizations have formulated special intellectual property policies to deal with the licensing of intellectual property under this trend and to regulate the abuse of various patent rights. Comparatively speaking, our country standardization organization to this question research starts relatively late, lacks the thorough research. Therefore, the research in technical standards is urgent and practical significance for our country. The first chapter begins with the three concepts of standardization system, connotation of technical standards and characteristics of patent rights, and points out that with the increasing strengthening of the global knowledge economy, whether from the formulation of meeting the technical standards, The patentee's interest demand is still the strategic choice under the global free trade environment. The combination of the two seemingly contradictory concepts in the traditional concept of technology standard and patent has become an inevitable trend. On this basis, this paper analyzes the effect of the combination of the two, and brings out the problem to be discussed in this paper: the abuse of patent right in the technical standard. The second chapter enumerates four typical examples: the Dell computer Corporation case, Cisco v. Huawei case, DVD case and MPEG-2 Technology Standard Patent Pool, This paper expounds in detail that the abuse of patent rights in technical standards is mainly manifested in the fact that the patentee, on the one hand, actively promotes the standardization of his patent technology through various means, on the other hand, makes use of his own patent right to manipulate the standard to formulate and implement the standard. In the technical standard formulation and implementation stage constitutes the patent right abuse. The third chapter analyzes the main means of solving the problem of patent rights of technical standards by international standardization organization, regional standardization organization and major developed countries' standardization organization. At present, the regulation of patent abuse in technical standards by foreign standardization organizations is mainly embodied in three aspects: the necessary patent system in the process of standard establishment, the patent information disclosure system and the patent right in the technical standard. Permit without discrimination. Through the analysis of two typical cases: patent infringement case of Rambus Company and Apple suing Motorola for abuse of Standard essential Patent Litigation, the advantages and disadvantages of the three intellectual property policies regulating patent abuse are comprehensively analyzed. The fourth chapter starts with the basic considerations of the technical standards involved in patent issues in China's Standardization Organization, and suggests that China's Standardization Organization may proceed from its own interests by strengthening and refining the ISO's patent policy. To perfect the relevant systems in the Patent Law of our country and the relevant supporting rules under the Standardization Law, and to formulate a set of standard intellectual property protection strategies that are compatible with the laws and regulations of our country's intellectual property rights. In order to balance the interests of the public and patentee and further standardize the standardization of intellectual property rights in China.
【学位授予单位】：华南理工大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2013
【分类号】：D923.42
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前9条
1 赵启杉;;标准化组织专利政策反垄断审查要点剖析——IEEE新专利政策及美国司法部反垄断审查意见介评[J];电子知识产权;2007年10期
2 丁蔚;;Rambus案最新进展与政府在标准化制度中的作用[J];电子知识产权;2009年02期
3 马海生;;标准化组织的FRAND许可政策实证分析[J];电子知识产权;2009年02期
4 贾晓辉;潘峰;;标准组织知识产权政策FRAND许可原则评析[J];信息技术与标准化;2010年Z1期
5 朱翔华;;国际标准中的知识产权政策及对我国的启示[J];标准科学;2009年02期
6 安佰生;;标准化中的专利权问题:进展与挑战[J];知识产权;2008年05期
7 那英;;技术标准中的必要专利研究[J];知识产权;2010年06期
8 汪莉;;标准化中专利权滥用行为的法律规制[J];知识产权;2011年06期
9 郭凯;;标准与专利难题亟待破解 “面向创新的标准与专利政策研讨会”召开[J];中国标准化;2012年07期
相关博士学位论文 前1条
1 杨帆;技术标准中的专利问题研究[D];中国政法大学;2006年
相关硕士学位论文 前3条
1 刘晓轩;专利型技术标准壁垒问题研究[D];东北师范大学;2009年
2 满璐;标准组织知识产权政策中的专利信息披露制度研究[D];山东大学;2009年
3 邵萌子;技术标准中的专利权问题研究[D];北京化工大学;2010年
本文编号：2379369
本文链接：https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/zhishichanquanfa/2379369.html
