论知识产权与民法典的互动——以立法形式为分析视角
发布时间:2019-03-09 13:24
【摘要】:在法典化国家中,知识产权自其问世始,始终与民法典存在着互动关系。其通过立法形式而表现出民法典对知识产权私权性质的体系判断和知识产权对民法典内容的充实。近代法典化思维源于罗马法的法典化思维及体系要素的思考,但受制于社会商品经济的发展水平、科学技术的发展水平尤其是人们对知识信息重要性及商品性的认识程度,近代民法法典化初萌的成果中未将人们对知识信息的创造性或创作性成果纳入其法典体系要素中。但当有关知识产权的理论和实践面对“权利”时,源于罗马法的民法典之私权理念就直接引导着知识产权的立法制度价值与功能并决定了知识产权的立法体系定位。意大利、俄罗斯等国民法典与知识产权的紧密契合式的互动值得我们关注。对我国而言,通过民法典与单行法“二元”立法结构来实现知识产权与民法典的互动是一个值得尝试的立法路径。
[Abstract]:In codified countries, intellectual property has been interacted with civil code since it came into being. Through the form of legislation, it shows the systematic judgment of the nature of private rights of intellectual property rights and the enrichment of the contents of the civil code by intellectual property rights. The modern codification thinking originated from the codification thinking of Roman law and the thinking of the system elements, but was restricted by the development level of the social commodity economy, the level of development of science and technology, especially the degree of people's understanding of the importance of knowledge and information and the commercialization. In the early achievements of codification of modern civil law, people's creative or creative achievements on knowledge and information have not been incorporated into the elements of their codification system. However, when the theory and practice of intellectual property rights are faced with "rights", the concept of private rights derived from Roman law directly guides the value and function of the legislative system of intellectual property rights and determines the orientation of the legislative system of intellectual property rights. Italy, Russia and other civil codes and intellectual property rights closely compatible interaction worthy of our attention. For our country, it is a worthy legislative path to realize the interaction between intellectual property and civil code through the "dual" legislative structure between civil code and single law.
【作者单位】: 中国政法大学法律硕士学院;
【分类号】:D923;;D923.4
本文编号:2437490
[Abstract]:In codified countries, intellectual property has been interacted with civil code since it came into being. Through the form of legislation, it shows the systematic judgment of the nature of private rights of intellectual property rights and the enrichment of the contents of the civil code by intellectual property rights. The modern codification thinking originated from the codification thinking of Roman law and the thinking of the system elements, but was restricted by the development level of the social commodity economy, the level of development of science and technology, especially the degree of people's understanding of the importance of knowledge and information and the commercialization. In the early achievements of codification of modern civil law, people's creative or creative achievements on knowledge and information have not been incorporated into the elements of their codification system. However, when the theory and practice of intellectual property rights are faced with "rights", the concept of private rights derived from Roman law directly guides the value and function of the legislative system of intellectual property rights and determines the orientation of the legislative system of intellectual property rights. Italy, Russia and other civil codes and intellectual property rights closely compatible interaction worthy of our attention. For our country, it is a worthy legislative path to realize the interaction between intellectual property and civil code through the "dual" legislative structure between civil code and single law.
【作者单位】: 中国政法大学法律硕士学院;
【分类号】:D923;;D923.4
【相似文献】
相关重要报纸文章 前10条
1 本报记者 戎素梅 吴敏;合肥市:以地方立法形式确定集中委托执法[N];中国政府采购报;2013年
2 本报记者 王春霞;反家暴采取什么立法形式还需研究[N];中国妇女报;2013年
3 本报记者 安普忠;张学锋代表——以国家立法形式褒奖保护见义勇为人员[N];解放军报;2011年
4 本报记者 台建林;成功经验应以立法形式巩固[N];法制日报;2007年
5 本报记者 赵丽;中国为何以立法形式设立纪念日和公祭日[N];法制日报;2014年
6 朱海滔;关键是加强法规执行力[N];经济日报;2014年
7 樊大_g;地铁禁食立法需要多少理由?[N];中国食品安全报;2014年
8 驻河北记者 李秋云 实习记者 杨国勇;河北非遗保护条例6月施行[N];中国文化报;2014年
9 记者 项前;隐瞒安全事故最高罚10万[N];重庆商报;2005年
10 记者 蔡钰 李博;立法保护老字号[N];首都建设报;2014年
相关硕士学位论文 前2条
1 顾炜;论民法基本原则的立法形式[D];山东大学;2010年
2 洪欣;论我国刑法立法模式的改革[D];中国青年政治学院;2011年
,本文编号:2437490
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/zhishichanquanfa/2437490.html