基于微观视角的稀土资源税改革效果评价研究
本文关键词: 稀土 资源税改革 微观视角 效果评价 出处:《江西理工大学》2017年硕士论文 论文类型:学位论文
【摘要】:稀土,被誉为“工业维生素”和“新材料之母”,是促进未来新材料产品发展的重要工业原料,对我国经济发展和国家安全发挥着重要的战略作用。《中国制造2025》以及“互联网+”战略的提出,给稀土产业的发展带来了巨大潜力。与此同时,《稀土行业发展规划(2016-2020年)》的制定也为稀土产业进一步发展提出新的要求。可以说,我国稀土产业正处于最好的发展机遇期。但是,稀土产业发展面临的挑战同样严峻,产业结构不合理,资源优势无法转化为经济优势,稀土资源无序开采,浪费严重,定价权缺失等“稀土问题”始终制约着稀土产业的发展。究其原因,稀土资源缺乏合理的价格形成机制是导致“稀土问题”出现的根本所在。资源税作为矿产资源企业税收成本的重要组成部分,对构建稀土价格形成机制至关重要。然而,稀土资源税自1994年开征以来,却存在着税率较轻、计税方式不合理等“水土不服”的问题。我国先后两次对稀土资源税进行改革,旨在不断完善稀土资源税制,而稀土资源的特殊性及其战略地位决定了稀土资源税改革不可能一蹴而就。学者们专门对稀土资源税改革这一问题研究较少,从微观视角出发进行研究几乎没有。本文以稀土资源税改革产生的效果为研究对象,从微观视角出发,对改革目的实现情况进行评价。在论述稀土资源、稀土产业特点及稀土资源税改革背景和目的基础上,本文运用本量利分析法、计量经济模型等方法对稀土资源税改革效果进行实证研究。主要得出以下几点结论:一是资源税收在稀土企业成本结构的地位大幅提升,从价计征方式更能体现“级差收益”原则;二是稀土资源税对利润敏感程度加大,从价计征方式更能发挥弹性调节作用;三是稀土资源税改革无法促进稀土资源的节约开采;四是稀土资源税改革未能构建合理的稀土价格形成机制;五是稀土资源税改革对产业结构的转型升级有一定的促进作用。对于实证发现稀土资源税改革存在的不足之处,本文提出区分稀土元素内部价值差异以设置合理的弹性税率、考虑将实际可采储量作为计税依据以及推行“稀土资源拍卖”方式等政策建议,为进一步深化稀土资源税改革提供思路,真正体现稀土资源的稀缺价值和战略价值,以期促进稀土产业的持续健康发展。
[Abstract]:Rare earth, known as "industrial vitamin" and "mother of new materials", is an important industrial raw material to promote the development of new material products in the future. It plays an important strategic role in China's economic development and national security. The "made in China 2025" and the "Internet" strategy have brought great potential to the development of rare earth industry. The formulation of rare earth industry development plan 2016-2020 also puts forward new requirements for the further development of rare earth industry. It can be said that China's rare earth industry is in the best development opportunity period. The development of rare earth industry is faced with the same severe challenges, the industrial structure is unreasonable, the advantages of resources can not be transformed into economic advantages, rare earth resources are exploited disorderly and wasted seriously. The lack of pricing power and other "rare earth problems" have always restricted the development of rare earth industry. The lack of reasonable price formation mechanism of rare earth resources is the root of the "rare earth problem". Resource tax is an important part of the tax cost of mineral resources enterprises. It is essential to build a price formation mechanism for rare earths. However, since the levy in 1994, there has been a relatively low tax rate on rare earths. China has twice reformed the rare earth resource tax in order to continuously improve the rare earth resource tax system. The particularity and strategic status of rare earth resources determine that the reform of rare earth resources tax can not be accomplished overnight. There is almost no research from the micro perspective. This paper takes the effect of the tax reform of rare earth resources as the research object, from the micro perspective, evaluates the realization of the reform purpose, and discusses the rare earth resources. On the basis of the characteristics of rare earth industry and the background and purpose of the reform of rare earth resource tax, this paper applies the cost-profit analysis method. Empirical study on the effect of rare earth resource tax reform is carried out by econometric model. The main conclusions are as follows: first, the status of resource tax in the cost structure of rare earth enterprises is greatly enhanced. The principle of "differential income" can be better embodied in the method of calculating value according to value; Second, the rare-earth resource tax is more sensitive to profit, and the ad valorem method can play a more flexible role; Third, the tax reform of rare earth resources can not promote the economical exploitation of rare earth resources; Fourth, the reform of rare earth resource tax failed to construct a reasonable mechanism of rare earth price formation; Fifth, the reform of rare earth resources tax has a certain role in promoting the transformation and upgrading of industrial structure. This paper puts forward some policy suggestions, such as distinguishing the internal value difference of rare earth elements to set up reasonable flexible tax rate, considering the actual recoverable reserves as the basis of tax calculation and implementing the "rare earth resources auction" method. In order to promote the sustainable and healthy development of rare earth industry, this paper provides ideas for further deepening the reform of rare earth resource tax, and truly embodies the scarcity value and strategic value of rare earth resources.
【学位授予单位】:江西理工大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2017
【分类号】:F812.42;F426;F406.7
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 王证;赖丹;;稀土资源税改革对企业价值的影响研究——基于事件研究法[J];财会通讯;2016年26期
2 张楠;;江西稀土资源税的最优税率选择——基于CGE模型的分析[J];中国集体经济;2016年19期
3 张绪武;;稀土资源税改革效果、存在的问题及对策研究[J];财政科学;2016年06期
4 赵汀;范振婷;刘超;;稀土资源税费改革对我国稀土企业成本收益影响分析[J];中国矿业;2016年06期
5 杜凤莲;王媛;;战略性资源关税的替代性政策研究——以稀土出口为例[J];经济科学;2015年03期
6 蒲方合;;基于资源节约的我国矿产资源税之功能定位及其制度重构[J];经济体制改革;2015年03期
7 单顺安;;资源税功能定位的再认识及完善措施[J];税务研究;2015年05期
8 杨鹃;付京亚;;我国资源税从价计征改革的环境效应分析[J];价格理论与实践;2015年04期
9 赖丹;吴一丁;罗翔;;稀土行业的盈余波动、影响因素及政策调整[J];资源与产业;2014年06期
10 赖丹;曾珍;;中美稀土资源生态环境税费制度比较[J];财会月刊;2014年22期
相关硕士学位论文 前10条
1 刘平;资源税改革对H煤炭企业的财务影响研究[D];安徽大学;2015年
2 张二茹;基于功能定位的我国资源税改革研究[D];河北经贸大学;2015年
3 蒋晶;基于资源与环境保护的资源税改革研究[D];西南财经大学;2014年
4 朱汉亚;我国资源税改革研究[D];江西财经大学;2013年
5 潘龙;我国稀土产业的经济法保护研究[D];南京航空航天大学;2013年
6 谢玲玲;中国稀土贸易分析[D];上海交通大学;2013年
7 刘佳;资源税对矿产资源型地区产业结构优化调整的影响[D];西北大学;2012年
8 苏笑;资源税的历史沿革及其对煤炭企业的影响[D];山西财经大学;2012年
9 陈嘉佳;关于我国资源税功能转变的思考[D];东北财经大学;2010年
10 邓强;中国稀土资源合理开发利用的经济学分析[D];内蒙古财经学院;2010年
,本文编号:1467726
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/gongshangguanlilunwen/1467726.html