环境污染治理、市场化与能源效率:理论与实证分析

发布时间：2018-04-06 05:11

本文选题：环境污染治理　切入点：市场化　出处：《南京社会科学》2017年02期

【摘要】：本文对环境污染治理、市场化影响能源效率的理论机制进行了解析,并基于Dynamic-SBM模型方法测算了1998-2012年全国30个省市的能源效率数据,初步检验了环境污染治理、市场化水平对能源效率的影响。同时,鉴于环境污染治理、市场化水平和能源效率存在的空间集聚性及空间差异性,采用空间计量模型对环境污染治理、市场化与能源效率的空间关联机制进行了实证研究。结果发现:环境污染治理投资规模的扩大,有利于能源效率的改善;而采用单一指标所测度的市场化水平则对能源效率有着显著的负向影响。表明环境污染治理可以形成倒逼机制推动企业自主创新,实现生产方式升级改造,从而改善能源效率。政府干预导致能源要素市场扭曲的存在及造成的能源价格低估,使得市场化对能源效率产生了负向影响。
[Abstract]:In this paper, the theoretical mechanism of environmental pollution control and market-oriented energy efficiency is analyzed. Based on the Dynamic-SBM model, the energy efficiency data of 30 provinces and cities in China from 1998 to 2012 are calculated, and the environmental pollution control is preliminarily tested.The influence of marketization level on energy efficiency.At the same time, in view of the spatial agglomeration and difference of environmental pollution control, marketization level and energy efficiency, the spatial correlation mechanism of environmental pollution control, marketization and energy efficiency is studied empirically by using spatial metrological model.The results show that the expansion of the scale of investment in environmental pollution control is conducive to the improvement of energy efficiency, while the marketization level measured by a single index has a significant negative impact on energy efficiency.It is shown that environmental pollution control can form a backward mechanism to promote enterprises' independent innovation, realize the upgrading of production mode, and improve energy efficiency.The market distortion of energy factors and the undervaluation of energy prices caused by government intervention make marketization have a negative impact on energy efficiency.
【作者单位】：南京农业大学经济管理学院;
【基金】：中央高校基本科研业务经费创新项目及人文探索项目“基于动态SBM模型的工业污染,环境治理与城市能耗效率测算”(SKCX2016001);“扩张性财政政策背景下国有企业市场势力测度及福利效应变化研究”(SKTS2016005) 中国博士后科学基金第58批面上项目“国际能源价格波动对国内农产品价格波动的传导效应研究”(2015M581819) 江苏省高校优势学科建设工程资助项目(PAPD)的阶段性成果
【分类号】：X196;F426.2

【相似文献】