中国制造业及其细分行业在全球价值链中的价值增值获取能力研究--基于投入产出和生产分割视角

发布时间：2018-08-11 09:30

【摘要】：借鉴Koopman和王直等提出的全球价值链参与度指数、地位指数和长度指数,基于产品生产分工过程的"碎片化"和"分割化"属性,运用WIOD和对外经济贸易大学发布的投入产出和全球价值链统计数据,对比分析我国制造业及其细分行业在全球价值链中的发展形势与特征。研究结果表明:制造业及其细分行业全球价值链参与度主要由深向参与度驱动,产品生产过程复杂;制造业全球价值链地位指数和长度指数之间不存在显性的相关关系,地位指数和长度指数受2008年世界金融危机影响较为显著;中国制造业全球价值链参与度指数和地位指数整体排名较为靠后,但观测期内呈现波动上升态势;中国制造业细分行业全球价值链参与度指数、地位指数和长度指数存在行业异质性,劳动及资源密集型产业存在显性比较优势,知识、资本和技术密集型产业存在显性比较劣势。
[Abstract]:Referring to the participation index, status index and length index of global value chain proposed by Koopman and Wang Zhi, based on the "fragmentation" and "fragmentation" of the process of division of labor in product production, Based on the input-output and global value chain statistics published by WIOD and the University of Foreign Economics and Trade, this paper compares and analyzes the development situation and characteristics of China's manufacturing industry and its subdivision industries in the global value chain. The results show that the global value chain participation in manufacturing and its segments is mainly driven by deep participation, and the manufacturing process is complex, and there is no explicit correlation between the manufacturing global value chain status index and the length index. The status index and the length index were significantly affected by the 2008 world financial crisis, while the global value chain participation index and status index of China's manufacturing industry ranked relatively low, but the trend of fluctuation increased during the observation period. The global value chain participation index, status index and length index of Chinese manufacturing subdivision industry have industry heterogeneity, labor and resource intensive industries have dominant comparative advantage, knowledge, Capital and technology-intensive industries have dominant comparative disadvantages.
【作者单位】：北京工业大学经济与管理学院;
【基金】：国家自然科学基金项目“碳排放权市场特性、定价机理与政策模拟设计研究”(项目编号:71473010)
【分类号】：F424

【相似文献】