当前位置:主页 > 管理论文 > 工商管理论文 >

福建省工业节能减排效率及绿色发展路径选择研究

发布时间:2018-11-07 11:50
【摘要】:改革开放以来的三十多年里,我国经济高速发展主要依赖于高消耗、高投入、高排放以及低效率的支撑。中国的GDP占全球GDP的12%,而能源消费却占到了世界总量的22%,碳排放量更是占到了30%。如何协调经济增长与能源节约、环境保护间的关系,日益受到多方关注。福建省作为中国东南沿海大省,加快经济绿色发展是提升竞争力、对接国家政策的必行之举。目前,相关领域的学术界已经达成共识,推动经济增长的重要来源是技术进步。而在推动经济增长的技术进步过程中,生产者会对不同生产要素产生差异偏好,这种对各种投入要素偏好的差异将直接影响生产所带来的能源消耗和污染排放。因此,在技术进步有偏的实际情况下,对福建省节能减排的最优绿色发展路径进行研究具有重要意义。本文根据要素集约度产业分类法,将经过整理的36个福建省工业行业划分为资源密集型、劳动密集型和资本密集型三类工业行业。首先利用SBM-DDF模型对三类异质性工业行业的节能效率及潜力、减排效率及潜力进行测算。其次,采用超越对数生产函数形式的随机前沿方法,对福建省工业行业的有偏技术进步现状进行测算和分析。最后,对要素产出弹性和要素替代弹性进行测算,并在其测算结果的基础上结合节能减排现状和技术进步要素偏向的现状进行研究,从要素偏向程度的角度为三类异质性工业行业选择绿色发展的最优路径。本文研究发现,与处于生产前沿面上的工业行业相比,福建省大部分工业行业的节能效率和减排效率并不理想,减排效率略高于节能效率,且存在较大的节能减排潜力;福建省工业部门的技术进步表现为对劳动要素和能源要素的双重依赖;从要素偏好程度高低的角度做出工业绿色发展路径的最优选择:资源密集型行业为劳动-资本-能源-环境,劳动密集型行业为劳动-能源-环境-资本,资本密集型行业为资本-劳动-环境-能源。研究成果为福建省不同类型的工业行业,在技术进步的绿色发展过程中调整要素偏好顺序提供了可靠依据。
[Abstract]:In the past 30 years since the reform and opening up, the rapid economic development of our country mainly depends on the support of high consumption, high input, high emission and low efficiency. China's GDP accounts for 12% of global GDP, while energy consumption accounts for 22% of the world's total, and carbon emissions account for 30%. How to coordinate the relationship between economic growth and energy conservation and environmental protection has attracted more and more attention. As a large coastal province in southeast China, Fujian Province is necessary to accelerate the green development of economy. At present, the academic circles in related fields have reached a consensus that the important source of economic growth is technological progress. In the process of promoting economic growth, producers will have different preferences for different factors of production, which will directly affect the energy consumption and pollution emissions caused by production. Therefore, it is of great significance to study the optimal green development path of energy saving and emission reduction in Fujian Province. In this paper, 36 industries in Fujian Province are classified into three types: resource-intensive, labor-intensive and capital-intensive. Firstly, the energy saving efficiency and potential, emission reduction efficiency and potential of three heterogeneous industries are measured by SBM-DDF model. Secondly, using the stochastic frontier method in the form of logarithmic production function, the paper calculates and analyzes the present situation of the biased technology progress in Fujian industrial industry. Finally, the elasticity of factor output and the elasticity of factor substitution are calculated, and based on the calculation results, the current situation of energy saving and emission reduction and the current situation of factor bias of technological progress are studied. From the angle of factor bias, the optimal path of green development is chosen for three kinds of heterogeneous industries. In this paper, compared with the industrial industries on the front line of production, the energy-saving efficiency and emission-reduction efficiency of most industrial industries in Fujian Province are not ideal, the emission reduction efficiency is slightly higher than the energy-saving efficiency, and there is a great potential for energy-saving and emission-reduction. The technological progress of the industrial sector in Fujian Province is characterized by the dual dependence on the labor and energy elements; From the angle of the degree of factor preference, the optimal choice of industrial green development path is made: the resource-intensive industry is labor-capital-energy-environment, the labor-intensive industry is labor-energy-environment-capital. Capital-intensive industries are capital-labor-environment-energy. The research results provide a reliable basis for adjusting the preference order of factors in the process of green development of technological progress in different types of industrial industries in Fujian Province.
【学位授予单位】:华侨大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2017
【分类号】:F427

【参考文献】

相关期刊论文 前10条

1 杨振兵;邵帅;杨莉莉;;中国绿色工业变革的最优路径选择——基于技术进步要素偏向视角的经验考察[J];经济学动态;2016年01期

2 王兵;刘光天;;节能减排与中国绿色经济增长——基于全要素生产率的视角[J];中国工业经济;2015年05期

3 郝枫;;超越对数函数要素替代弹性公式修正与估计方法比较[J];数量经济技术经济研究;2015年04期

4 王光栋;;有偏技术进步、技术路径与就业增长[J];工业技术经济;2014年12期

5 郭玲玲;武春友;;中国节能减排潜力测度与优化路径[J];技术经济;2014年11期

6 胡春龙;常逸聪;;产出弹性、替代弹性与经济增长的关系分析——基于西部地区面板模型的经验研究[J];金融发展研究;2014年10期

7 余泳泽;邓姗姗;;我国节能减排的现状、问题与解决路径——一个文献综述[J];产业经济评论;2014年06期

8 景维民;张璐;;环境管制、对外开放与中国工业的绿色技术进步[J];经济研究;2014年09期

9 张奋勤;孙永平;余s,

本文编号:2316278


资料下载
论文发表

本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/gongshangguanlilunwen/2316278.html


Copyright(c)文论论文网All Rights Reserved | 网站地图 |

版权申明:资料由用户fe0d4***提供,本站仅收录摘要或目录,作者需要删除请E-mail邮箱bigeng88@qq.com