控制我国通胀:数量型工具与价格型工具的比较分析
发布时间：2019-05-15 15:36
【摘要】：控制通胀可运用价格型和数量型两类工具。数量型工具能控制需求拉动型通货膨胀,对货币需求的利率弹性要求低,不直接影响实体经济的运行,而价格型工具则比较适于控制成本推进型的通胀,要求货币需求有比较高的利率弹性,今后我国可能出现内生性的中长期滞胀问题,如果以价格型工具控制通胀,可能导致我国经济加速滑坡并带来混合型通货膨胀。
[Abstract]:Two kinds of tools can be used to control inflation: price type and quantity type. Quantitative tools can control demand-driven inflation, and the interest rate elasticity of money demand is low, which does not directly affect the operation of the real economy, while price tools are more suitable to control cost-driven inflation. If the demand for money is required to have high interest rate elasticity, there may be an endophytic problem of medium and long term stagflation in China in the future. if inflation is controlled by price tools, it may lead to the accelerated decline of China's economy and mixed inflation.
【作者单位】： 湖南工业大学创新与战略管理研究所;中南大学商学院;
【分类号】：F822.5
本文编号：2477607
[Abstract]:Two kinds of tools can be used to control inflation: price type and quantity type. Quantitative tools can control demand-driven inflation, and the interest rate elasticity of money demand is low, which does not directly affect the operation of the real economy, while price tools are more suitable to control cost-driven inflation. If the demand for money is required to have high interest rate elasticity, there may be an endophytic problem of medium and long term stagflation in China in the future. if inflation is controlled by price tools, it may lead to the accelerated decline of China's economy and mixed inflation.
【作者单位】： 湖南工业大学创新与战略管理研究所;中南大学商学院;
【分类号】：F822.5
【相似文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 郑湘明;;控制我国通胀:数量型工具与价格型工具的比较分析[J];经济学动态;2011年04期
2 ;[J];;年期
3 ;[J];;年期
4 ;[J];;年期
5 ;[J];;年期
6 ;[J];;年期
7 ;[J];;年期
8 ;[J];;年期
9 ;[J];;年期
10 ;[J];;年期
，本文编号：2477607
本文链接：https://www.wllwen.com/guanlilunwen/bankxd/2477607.html
