理论构建型案例研究规范性评估——基于内容分析的对比研究

发布时间：2018-03-13 14:17

本文选题：理论构建　切入点：案例研究　出处：《管理评论》2015年08期 　论文类型：期刊论文

【摘要】：作为一种研究策略,案例分析有助于理解和描绘复杂的现象,其中,理论构建型案例研究由于其探索性本质能够更为准确的解释企业的管理行为。本文在归纳性分析的基础上提出评估理论构建型案例研究的规范性指标,并依据此指标对1990-1999年和2001-2010年的国际顶级期刊AMJ的文献进行评价。通过两阶段文献的编码、提炼与对比,我们发现,案例选择、明确分析单元、多位调查者的不同分工说明、证据三角形和构念的定义与测量等十个指标的规范性有了较大幅度的提高。但明确分析单元、基于团队的研究、多位调查者的不同分工说明和定性加定量数据等四个指标仍然处于较低重视水平。案例研究草案、试验性研究和案例研究数据库三个指标处于低规范化程度,需要进一步加强。
[Abstract]:As a research strategy, case studies help to understand and depict complex phenomena, The theoretical constructive case study can explain the enterprise's management behavior more accurately because of its exploratory nature. Based on the inductive analysis, this paper puts forward the normative index of the evaluation theory construction case study. According to this index, the literature of international top periodical AMJ from 1990 to 1999 and 2001-2010 is evaluated. Through the coding, refining and comparing of the two stages of literature, we find that case selection, clear analysis unit, different division of labor of many investigators are explained. The standardization of ten indicators, such as the definition and measurement of evidence triangles and structuring, has been greatly improved. But clear analysis units, based on team research, The four indexes of different division of labor and qualitative and quantitative data of multiple investigators are still at a low level. The draft of case study, the experimental study and the database of case study are of low standardization, which need to be further strengthened.
【作者单位】：大连理工大学管理与经济学部;
【基金】：国家自然科学基金重点项目(71033002);国家自然科学基金项目(70872013)
【分类号】：C93

【相似文献】