论大学智库的功能定位及其体制性供给路径——基于广东省内5所一本重点大学25个校级以上人文社科基地实证调查的分析

发布时间：2018-06-15 14:39

本文选题：大学智库 + 修辞框架　；参考：《江淮论坛》2015年06期

【摘要】：研究视角的价值中立性和研究结论的公共性,决定了大学智库对政府的政策行为具有工具性的运用功能、符号性的传递功能和概念性的启迪功能。通过抽样访谈和问卷调研地处广州市区5所一本重点大学25个校级以上人文社科研究基地的功能运行状况,发现其研究成果的政策转换率大大低于学术影响力。进一步分析作为供给者的大学智库与作为需求者的政府部门之间用以表述思想的修辞框架,发现高校智库提供的学术成果与政府所需的智库产品之间产生了供求落差,其原因在于:没有形成"政策科学家集团"所借以相互认同的共同范式,以及确保该范式得以传承的制度化供给机制。化解此类矛盾的根本路径在于通过制度创新,构建供求均衡的认知性沟通机制、"研用一致"的信任性吸纳机制及共识扩展的认同性传播机制。
[Abstract]:The value neutrality of the research perspective and the publicity of the research conclusions determine that the university think tanks have the instrumental function, the symbolic transmission function and the conceptual enlightening function to the government's policy behavior. Through sampling interview and questionnaire investigation on the functional operation of 25 or more research bases of humanities and social sciences in 5 key universities in Guangzhou, it is found that the policy conversion rate of the research results is much lower than that of academic influence. Further analyzing the rhetorical framework used to express ideas between the university think-tanks as a supplier and the government departments as demanders, it is found that there is a gap between supply and demand between the academic achievements provided by the university think tanks and the products needed by the government. The reason lies in the absence of a common paradigm through which the Group of Policy scientists can identify with each other and the institutional supply mechanism to ensure the continuity of the paradigm. The fundamental way to resolve this kind of contradiction lies in the establishment of cognitive communication mechanism of equilibrium between supply and demand through institutional innovation, the trust absorption mechanism of "consistent use" and the identity communication mechanism of consensus expansion.
【作者单位】：华南农业大学公共管理学院;
【基金】：教育部人文社会科学规划基金项目(11JA810028) 广东省委宣传部2013年度宣传人才专项基金项目(XCWHRCZXSK2013-22)
【分类号】：C932

【相似文献】