论中国近代工程教育体系的两种范式

发布时间：2018-02-13 18:17

  本文关键词： 工程学科 中体西用 学术分途　出处：《高等工程教育研究》2017年06期 　论文类型：期刊论文

【摘要】：中国近代工程教育体系构建中,处理工程学科与其他学科关系先后存在两种范式:人文统合范式与科学分立范式。两种范式都将工程技术知识体系归于"用"或"术",对工程技术知识体系与整个知识系统关系的认识存有分歧,表现为工程教育理念、制度、课程设置等层面差异。统合范式接续传统工程知识观,以经史之学统摄工程,保障了工程知识与整个知识体系的统一,逻辑上具有自洽性,践行中面临制度与文化双重困境。分立范式迎合社会需求,短期内促进了工程教育发展,但与工程综合性特点之间具有不可避免的张力。
[Abstract]:In the construction of engineering education system in modern China, There are two paradigms in dealing with the relationship between engineering discipline and other disciplines: humanistic integration paradigm and scientific discrete paradigm, both of which attribute engineering knowledge system to "use" or "skill", and to engineering technology knowledge system and integration. There are differences in the understanding of the relationship between the two knowledge systems, The integration paradigm follows the traditional view of engineering knowledge and dominates engineering through history, which ensures the unity of engineering knowledge and the whole knowledge system. The discrete paradigm caters to the needs of the society and promotes the development of engineering education in the short term, but there is an inevitable tension between it and the comprehensive characteristics of engineering.
【作者单位】： 北京航空航天大学高等教育研究所;
【分类号】：G649.29;TB-4
，

本文编号：1508793