以“道器合一”“道在器中”的理念重塑工程教育——工程教育哲学笔记之一

发布时间：2018-04-11 10:17

本文选题：工程教育哲学 + 工程教育史　；参考：《高等工程教育研究》2017年04期

【摘要】：工程教育哲学是工程哲学和教育哲学的交叉学科,工程教育的使命、目前形势和困境要求开拓和深化工程教育哲学研究,特别是要求研究工程教育理念问题。在教育史上,学校形态工程教育的开端晚于人文教育和科学教育两千多年。在工程教育缺席的情况下,一般性教育理念不可避免地是"排斥工程教育的教育理念"。在教育史上,纽曼和洪堡的教育理念都有"轻视工程教育"的特征。本文认为,工程教育理念的核心问题是道器关系问题。根据工程哲学原理、中国哲学史上对道器关系的认识以及对黑格尔主奴观和马克思工程观的分析,工程教育理念应该是道器合一和道在器中。这种理念既反对重道轻器又反对重器轻道,对工程教育的自立、自觉、自信和自强具有重要意义。
[Abstract]:Engineering education philosophy is an interdisciplinary subject of engineering philosophy and educational philosophy, and the mission of engineering education. At present, the situation and predicament demand to develop and deepen the research of engineering education philosophy, especially to study the concept of engineering education.In the history of education, the beginning of school form engineering education is more than two thousand years later than humanities education and science education.In the absence of engineering education, the general educational idea is inevitably "the educational idea of excluding engineering education".In the history of education, both Newman and Humboldt have the characteristics of "despising engineering education".This paper holds that the core problem of the concept of engineering education is the relationship between Tao and instrument.According to the principle of engineering philosophy, the understanding of the relationship between Tao and instrument in the history of Chinese philosophy, and the analysis of Hegel's view of master and slave and Marx's view of engineering, the idea of engineering education should be the integration of Tao and instrument and the combination of Tao and Tao.This concept is not only opposed to heavy road and light device, but also against heavy device and light road, which is of great significance to the independence, self-consciousness, self-confidence and self-improvement of engineering education.
【作者单位】：中国科学院大学人文学院;
【分类号】：G642;TB-4

【参考文献】