应用人机工效的工具台布局优化研究
发布时间:2018-05-01 00:04
本文选题:混合装配系统 + 装配效率 ; 参考:《现代制造工程》2017年01期
【摘要】:由于混合装配系统(Mixed-Model Assembly Systems,MMAS)中种类繁多的装配零件/装配用工具没有合理的布局标准,且很少考虑工人的生理特性和认知习惯,提出基于人机工效的装配零件/装配用工具的布局优化方案。重点研究了单层布局、双层布局及各层装配零件/装配用工具的分离布局,以及对应装配零件/装配用工具的混合布局等影响因素。通过鼠标对装配零件/装配用工具进行点击抓取,移动至装配位置,记录过程操作时间。结果表明:双层布局中,较难观察的零件摆放在最佳视区时人的操作时间最短,装配效率最高;而单层布局中,处于最佳视区的装配零件/装配用工具对应混合布局的装配效率次之。最后,以某发动机的装配仿真实验验证了以上实验结论的合理性和有效性。
[Abstract]:Because there are many kinds of assembly parts / assembly tools in Mixed-Model Assembly systems / assembly system, there is no reasonable layout standard, and the physiological characteristics and cognitive habits of workers are seldom considered. The layout optimization scheme of assembly parts / assembly tools based on ergonomics is proposed. The influence factors such as single layer layout, double layer layout, separate layout of assembly parts / tools for each layer, and mixed layout of corresponding assembly parts / assembly tools were studied. Click and grab the assembly parts / assembly tools by mouse, move to the assembly position and record the operation time. The results show that the parts that are difficult to observe in the double-layer layout have the shortest operating time and the highest assembly efficiency when placed in the best view area, while in the single-layer layout, The assembly efficiency of the assembly parts / assembly tools in the best view area corresponding to the mixed layout is second. Finally, the rationality and validity of the above conclusions are verified by the simulation of an engine assembly.
【作者单位】: 空军工程大学防空反导学院;
【基金】:国家自然科学基金项目(51405505)
【分类号】:TB491;TB18
【相似文献】
相关期刊论文 前1条
1 李金萍;赵蕴懿;;连接器定力矩安装工装的设计[J];航天制造技术;2006年02期
,本文编号:1826817
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/guanlilunwen/gongchengguanli/1826817.html