政府补贴下的三级低碳供应链减排博弈研究

发布时间：2018-01-20 21:09

本文关键词： 政府补贴三级供应链单位减排量成本分担博弈最优决策　出处：《工业技术经济》2017年11期 　论文类型：期刊论文

【摘要】：本文分别构建了政府补贴下,供应链上企业单独减排、供应商对制造商碳减排成本进行分担、供应商和零售商均对制造商碳减排成本进行分担3种减排模型,求解得到不同减排模式下,包括成本分担率和单位减排量在内的供应链最优决策。研究发现,政府补贴率的提升反而使成本分担率降低。通过博弈分析及算例验证得出:在供应链上三方企业联合减排下,即供应商和零售商都对制造商的碳减排研发提供资金支持时,单位产品的减排量及各企业利润达到最大,仅供应商对制造商碳减排成本分担时次之,供应链上企业单独减排时最小,但仅供应商一方对制造商的碳减排成本进行分担时的成本分担率,比其与零售商同时分担时的要大。这些结论为政府确立合适的补贴方案及供应链上企业减排策略的制定提供了理论依据。
[Abstract]:In this paper, we construct three models of reducing carbon emissions separately in the supply chain under government subsidies. Suppliers share the cost of carbon emission reduction for manufacturers, and both suppliers and retailers share the cost of carbon emission reduction for manufacturers. The optimal decision of supply chain including cost sharing rate and unit emission reduction is obtained under different emission reduction modes. On the contrary, the increase of government subsidy rate reduces the cost sharing rate. Through game analysis and example verification, it is concluded that under the joint emission reduction of the three parties in the supply chain. That is, when suppliers and retailers provide financial support for manufacturers' carbon emission reduction research and development, the unit product emission reduction amount and the profits of each enterprise reach the maximum, only suppliers share the cost of carbon emission reduction to manufacturers. In the supply chain, the enterprise reduces emissions by itself, but only the supplier shares the cost of carbon emission reduction of the manufacturer. These conclusions provide a theoretical basis for the government to establish appropriate subsidy schemes and the formulation of enterprise emission reduction strategies in the supply chain.
【作者单位】：中国矿业大学管理学院;
【基金】：国家社会科学基金项目(项目编号:15BGL219)
【分类号】：F224.32;F274
【正文快照】： 随着三大产业的迅速崛起,空气中二氧化碳过度增加,温室效应也越来越严重。碳排放问题成为各国政府、社会不得不面对的一大难题。中国政府规定一些高碳排企业在制定运营决策时必须将碳排放量作为考虑重点。研究表明,近年来消费者低碳意识的普遍提高,他们会更倾向于购买那些从生

【相似文献】