面向循环产业发展的废旧产品回收渠道模式研究

发布时间：2018-02-06 03:54

本文关键词： 混合回收渠道闭环供应链再制造 Stackelberg博弈　出处：《上海交通大学》2014年硕士论文　论文类型：学位论文

【摘要】：随着我国淘汰或废弃的电子商品越来越多和汽车保有量呈现持续增长趋势，电子产品和报废汽车的报废高峰期正在来临，与此同时我国整个废旧产品行业的回收渠道模式呈现单一化、分散化与不规范，发展进程较慢。本文专门以面向循环产业发展为导向，研究对废旧产品的回收渠道模式进行扩展，围绕由制造商、零售商和第三方回收机构组成的再制造闭环供应链的原型，，提出了三者两两同时进行回收废旧产品回收模式的类型，构建了相关收益函数模型，利用Stackelberg主从博弈模型，本文以制造商向其他方收取的回购价为自变量，选取整个闭环供应链体系下的废旧产品回收率、制造商利润以及整个闭环供应链的利润和零售商销售的零售产品价格等指标作为可比对象，推导出其相关指标关于回购价的目标函数，在其他条件不变的情况下进行对比分析，得出了混合回收渠道最佳模式为制造商与零售商混合回收渠道模式。然后通过具体算例分析对结论进行了进一步证明和现实意义解释。文章研究意义在于帮助处在循环产业的企业如何选择回收渠道模式研究渠道，做出最有利于企业利益的决策模式。在此基础上，本文将最优混合回收渠道模式与单一回收最优模式进行对比，认为MR模型优于R模式；并进一步对上述最优混合回收渠道模式进行优化，通过采取战略协作的措施来解决分散控制决策下产生的双重溢出问题。同时，本文还注重理论联系实际，选取循环再生龙头企业——格林美作为实例研究对象，验证了混合回收渠道模式的现实意义。
[Abstract]:With more and more electronic goods being eliminated or abandoned in our country and the quantity of automobile increasing continuously, the peak period of scrapping of electronic products and end-of-life vehicles is coming. At the same time, the recycling channel model of the whole industry of waste and used products in China presents a single, decentralized and non-standard, the development process is slow. This paper is oriented to the development of recycling industry. The research extends the recycling channel model of waste products around the prototype of the remanufacturing closed-loop supply chain composed of manufacturers retailers and third-party recycling agencies. This paper puts forward the type of recycling mode of waste and old products, constructs the model of related income function, and makes use of the Stackelberg master-slave game model. Based on the repo price charged by the manufacturer from other parties, this paper selects the recovery rate of the waste products under the closed-loop supply chain system as an independent variable. The manufacturer profit, the profit of the whole closed-loop supply chain and the retail product price sold by the retailer are taken as the comparable objects, and the objective function of the relevant indexes about the repo price is deduced. The comparative analysis is carried out under the condition that other conditions are not changed. It is concluded that the best model of mixed recovery channel is the mixed recovery channel model of manufacturer and retailer. Then the conclusion is further proved and the practical significance is explained by concrete example analysis. The research significance of this paper lies in the help place. Enterprises in the recycling industry how to choose the recycling channel model research channel. Make the most favorable decision-making model for the interests of the enterprise. On this basis, this paper compares the optimal mixed recovery channel model with the single recovery optimal model, and thinks that the Mr model is better than the R model. And further optimization of the above optimal mixed recovery channel model, through the adoption of strategic cooperation measures to solve the problem of dual spillover under decentralized control decision-making. At the same time, this paper also pays attention to the theory combined with practice. The recycling leading enterprise Greene Mei is selected as an example to verify the practical significance of the mixed recovery channel model.
【学位授予单位】：上海交通大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2014
【分类号】：F713.2

【参考文献】